{"title":"Fundamental period equations for plan irregular moment-resisting frame buildings","authors":"J. Suthar, Sharadkumar Purohit","doi":"10.13167/2024.28.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fundamental natural period of oscillation is a critical parameter in evaluating the design base shear of buildings. Worldwide seismic design codes typically employ height-based empirical formulas to estimate this period for various building categories, without distinguishing between regular and irregular buildings. This study proposes a formula specifically for reinforced concrete (RC) moment-resisting frame (MRF) buildings with dominant re-entrant corner type plan irregularity. A total of 190 re-entrant corner dominant building models with different shapes (C-, L-, T-, and PLUS-type), heights, and floor configurations were prepared, and eigenvalue analysis (EVA) was conducted. The fundamental natural period of oscillation for each model was evaluated and compared with the height-based formulas from seismic design codes and the period–height relationship proposed in existing literature. A nonlinear regression model, using a multi-variable power function, is proposed to estimate the fundamental natural period for these re-entrant corner dominant building models. This model considers the A/L ratio in both directions of the building, along with its height. Both unconstrained and constrained regression analyses were performed to derive a formula that best fits the fundamental natural period data. The study recommends that the unconstrained best-fit minus one standard deviation curve can conservatively define the fundamental natural period of oscillation for re-entrant corner dominant RC building models. The equation defining this curve has the potential to replace the existing seismic design code-based period-height formula.","PeriodicalId":29665,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Civil and Architectural Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Civil and Architectural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13167/2024.28.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The fundamental natural period of oscillation is a critical parameter in evaluating the design base shear of buildings. Worldwide seismic design codes typically employ height-based empirical formulas to estimate this period for various building categories, without distinguishing between regular and irregular buildings. This study proposes a formula specifically for reinforced concrete (RC) moment-resisting frame (MRF) buildings with dominant re-entrant corner type plan irregularity. A total of 190 re-entrant corner dominant building models with different shapes (C-, L-, T-, and PLUS-type), heights, and floor configurations were prepared, and eigenvalue analysis (EVA) was conducted. The fundamental natural period of oscillation for each model was evaluated and compared with the height-based formulas from seismic design codes and the period–height relationship proposed in existing literature. A nonlinear regression model, using a multi-variable power function, is proposed to estimate the fundamental natural period for these re-entrant corner dominant building models. This model considers the A/L ratio in both directions of the building, along with its height. Both unconstrained and constrained regression analyses were performed to derive a formula that best fits the fundamental natural period data. The study recommends that the unconstrained best-fit minus one standard deviation curve can conservatively define the fundamental natural period of oscillation for re-entrant corner dominant RC building models. The equation defining this curve has the potential to replace the existing seismic design code-based period-height formula.