Pharmacoeconomic study of the effectiveness of cytogenetic studies in patients with MM before prescribing first-line therapy

Yu. A. Zabolotneva, I. S. Krysanov
{"title":"Pharmacoeconomic study of the effectiveness of cytogenetic studies in patients with MM before prescribing first-line therapy","authors":"Yu. A. Zabolotneva, I. S. Krysanov","doi":"10.37489/2588-0519-2023-4-40-51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose of the study. Conducting an assessment of the economic consequences (clinical and economic analysis) when conducting cytogenetic studies before prescribing various first-line treatment regimens for multiple myeloma (MM). Materialsand methods. The pharmacoeconomic study was carried out using the method of cost analysis, “cost-effectiveness” within the framework of the State Guarantee Program (SGP). Results. A review of the literature demonstrated that a limited number of data are currently available on the clinical effectiveness of the analyzed regimens in the first line, both in patients with normal and high cytogenetic risk. The cost-effectiveness analysis showed that among the three studied 1st-line treatment regimens (VMP, Rd, VRd), in terms of PFS (progression-free survival), the coefficient was minimal for the VMP regimen in patients with high cytogenetic risk. Conclusion. The study showed that the choice and prescription of first-line therapy, depending on the results of a cytogenetic study, is a clinically effective and cost-effective approach to organizing medical care for adult patients with multiple myeloma in the Russian Federation. This could be used in the future to formulate.","PeriodicalId":326764,"journal":{"name":"Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0519-2023-4-40-51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the study. Conducting an assessment of the economic consequences (clinical and economic analysis) when conducting cytogenetic studies before prescribing various first-line treatment regimens for multiple myeloma (MM). Materialsand methods. The pharmacoeconomic study was carried out using the method of cost analysis, “cost-effectiveness” within the framework of the State Guarantee Program (SGP). Results. A review of the literature demonstrated that a limited number of data are currently available on the clinical effectiveness of the analyzed regimens in the first line, both in patients with normal and high cytogenetic risk. The cost-effectiveness analysis showed that among the three studied 1st-line treatment regimens (VMP, Rd, VRd), in terms of PFS (progression-free survival), the coefficient was minimal for the VMP regimen in patients with high cytogenetic risk. Conclusion. The study showed that the choice and prescription of first-line therapy, depending on the results of a cytogenetic study, is a clinically effective and cost-effective approach to organizing medical care for adult patients with multiple myeloma in the Russian Federation. This could be used in the future to formulate.
关于在一线疗法处方前对 MM 患者进行细胞遗传学研究的有效性的药物经济学研究
研究目的评估在为多发性骨髓瘤(MM)开具各种一线治疗方案之前进行细胞遗传学研究的经济后果(临床和经济分析)。材料和方法。在国家保障计划(SGP)框架内,采用 "成本效益 "成本分析方法进行药物经济学研究。研究结果文献综述显示,目前关于所分析的一线治疗方案在细胞遗传学风险正常和高风险患者中的临床疗效的数据数量有限。成本效益分析表明,在所研究的三种一线治疗方案(VMP、Rd、VRd)中,就PFS(无进展生存期)而言,VMP方案对细胞遗传学风险高的患者的系数最小。结论研究表明,在俄罗斯联邦,根据细胞遗传学研究结果选择和开具一线疗法处方,是组织多发性骨髓瘤成年患者医疗护理的一种临床有效且具有成本效益的方法。今后可利用这一方法制定:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信