A systematic review of studies on fine and coarse root traits measurement: towards the enhancement of urban forests monitoring and management

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Daniele Fantozzi, A. Montagnoli, D. Trupiano, Paolo Di Martino, G. Scippa, Gustavo Agosto, D. Chiatante, G. Sferra
{"title":"A systematic review of studies on fine and coarse root traits measurement: towards the enhancement of urban forests monitoring and management","authors":"Daniele Fantozzi, A. Montagnoli, D. Trupiano, Paolo Di Martino, G. Scippa, Gustavo Agosto, D. Chiatante, G. Sferra","doi":"10.3389/ffgc.2024.1322087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The analysis of fine and coarse roots’ functional traits has the potential to reveal the performance of the root system, which is pivotal in tree growth, development, and failure in both natural and urban forest ecosystems. Furthermore, root traits may be a powerful indicator of tree resilience mechanisms. However, due to the inherent difficulties in measuring ‘the hidden half,’ and despite the recent advancements, the relationships among root functional traits and biotic and abiotic drivers still suffer from a lack of information. Thus, our study aimed to evidence knowledge milestones and gaps and to categorize, discuss, and suggest future directions for effective experimental designs in fine and coarse root studies. To this end, we conducted a systematic literature review supported by backward manual referencing based on 55 root functional traits and 136 plant species potentially suitable for afforestation and reforestation of natural and urban forest ecosystems. The majority of the 168 papers on fine and coarse root studies selected in our review focused predominantly on European natural contexts for a few plant species, such as Fagus sylvatica, Picea abies, Pinus sylvestris, and Pinus cembra, and root functional traits such as standing biomass, phenology production, turnover rate, and non-structural carbohydrates (NSC). Additionally, the analyzed studies frequently lack information and uniformity in experimental designs, measurements, and statistical analysis, highlighting the difficult integration and comparison of outcomes derived from different experiments and sites. Moreover, no information has been detected in selected literature about urban forest ecosystems, while most of the studies focus on natural forests. These biases observed during our literature analysis led us to give key indications for future experiment designs with fine and coarse roots involved, which may contribute to the building up of common protocols to boost the monitoring, managing, and planning of afforestation and reforestation projects.","PeriodicalId":12538,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2024.1322087","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The analysis of fine and coarse roots’ functional traits has the potential to reveal the performance of the root system, which is pivotal in tree growth, development, and failure in both natural and urban forest ecosystems. Furthermore, root traits may be a powerful indicator of tree resilience mechanisms. However, due to the inherent difficulties in measuring ‘the hidden half,’ and despite the recent advancements, the relationships among root functional traits and biotic and abiotic drivers still suffer from a lack of information. Thus, our study aimed to evidence knowledge milestones and gaps and to categorize, discuss, and suggest future directions for effective experimental designs in fine and coarse root studies. To this end, we conducted a systematic literature review supported by backward manual referencing based on 55 root functional traits and 136 plant species potentially suitable for afforestation and reforestation of natural and urban forest ecosystems. The majority of the 168 papers on fine and coarse root studies selected in our review focused predominantly on European natural contexts for a few plant species, such as Fagus sylvatica, Picea abies, Pinus sylvestris, and Pinus cembra, and root functional traits such as standing biomass, phenology production, turnover rate, and non-structural carbohydrates (NSC). Additionally, the analyzed studies frequently lack information and uniformity in experimental designs, measurements, and statistical analysis, highlighting the difficult integration and comparison of outcomes derived from different experiments and sites. Moreover, no information has been detected in selected literature about urban forest ecosystems, while most of the studies focus on natural forests. These biases observed during our literature analysis led us to give key indications for future experiment designs with fine and coarse roots involved, which may contribute to the building up of common protocols to boost the monitoring, managing, and planning of afforestation and reforestation projects.
细根和粗根性状测量研究系统综述:加强城市森林监测和管理
分析细根和粗根的功能特征有可能揭示根系的性能,而根系在自然和城市森林生态系统中对树木的生长、发育和衰败都至关重要。此外,根系特征可能是树木恢复机制的有力指标。然而,由于测量 "隐藏的一半 "存在固有困难,尽管最近取得了一些进展,但根系功能特征与生物和非生物驱动因素之间的关系仍然缺乏信息。因此,我们的研究旨在证明知识的里程碑和差距,并对细根和粗根研究中有效的实验设计进行分类、讨论并提出未来的方向。为此,我们根据 55 种根的功能特性和 136 种可能适用于天然林和城市森林生态系统造林和再造林的植物物种进行了系统的文献综述,并辅以人工反向引用。我们的综述选取了 168 篇关于细根和粗根研究的论文,其中大部分主要集中在欧洲的自然环境中,涉及少数植物物种,如欧洲鼠尾草(Fagus sylvatica)、欧洲冷杉(Picea abies)、欧洲赤松(Pinus sylvestris)和欧洲冷杉(Pinus cembra),以及根系功能特性,如立木生物量、物候生产、周转率和非结构性碳水化合物(NSC)。此外,所分析的研究在实验设计、测量和统计分析方面经常缺乏信息和统一性,这突出表明很难整合和比较来自不同实验和地点的结果。此外,在选定的文献中没有发现有关城市森林生态系统的信息,而大多数研究都集中在天然森林方面。在文献分析中发现的这些偏差促使我们为未来涉及细根和粗根的实验设计提供了关键指标,这可能有助于建立通用协议,以促进造林和再造林项目的监测、管理和规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
256
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信