A confirmatory factor analytic study of a counterproductive work behaviour measure in Zimbabwe

Nelson Gwamanda, B. Mahembe
{"title":"A confirmatory factor analytic study of a counterproductive work behaviour measure in Zimbabwe","authors":"Nelson Gwamanda, B. Mahembe","doi":"10.4102/sajip.v50i0.2118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Orientation: Counterproductive work behaviour (CWB) has detrimental effects on organisations if not managed. Therefore, its accurate measurement will enhance proper decision-making to mitigate its effects.Research purpose: The primary goal of the present study was to test the psychometric properties of the Workplace Deviance Scale (WDS) on a Zimbabwean sample.Motivation for the study: The WDS developed in Europe is a widely used questionnaire. Therefore, there is a need to assess the reliability and construct validity of the WDS on a Zimbabwean sample.Research approach/design and method: A quantitative research design was used. A total of 304 conveniently selected participants completed the WDS used to measure CWB. Item, dimensional, and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were conducted on the data.Main findings: High reliability coefficients were recorded on the two subscales of the WDS. The discriminant validity of the two subscales was achieved. Reasonable model fit with the data was found for the first and second order as well as the bi-factor and single-factor measurement models through CFA.Practical/managerial implications: The questionnaire can help to develop prevention strategies aimed at reducing the frequency and severity of counterproductive behaviours in Zimbabwean organisations.Contribution/value-add: The study promotes the use of accurate, reliable, and valid instruments in Zimbabwe by confirming the psychometric properties of the WDS. ","PeriodicalId":503653,"journal":{"name":"SA Journal of Industrial Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Journal of Industrial Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v50i0.2118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Orientation: Counterproductive work behaviour (CWB) has detrimental effects on organisations if not managed. Therefore, its accurate measurement will enhance proper decision-making to mitigate its effects.Research purpose: The primary goal of the present study was to test the psychometric properties of the Workplace Deviance Scale (WDS) on a Zimbabwean sample.Motivation for the study: The WDS developed in Europe is a widely used questionnaire. Therefore, there is a need to assess the reliability and construct validity of the WDS on a Zimbabwean sample.Research approach/design and method: A quantitative research design was used. A total of 304 conveniently selected participants completed the WDS used to measure CWB. Item, dimensional, and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were conducted on the data.Main findings: High reliability coefficients were recorded on the two subscales of the WDS. The discriminant validity of the two subscales was achieved. Reasonable model fit with the data was found for the first and second order as well as the bi-factor and single-factor measurement models through CFA.Practical/managerial implications: The questionnaire can help to develop prevention strategies aimed at reducing the frequency and severity of counterproductive behaviours in Zimbabwean organisations.Contribution/value-add: The study promotes the use of accurate, reliable, and valid instruments in Zimbabwe by confirming the psychometric properties of the WDS. 
对津巴布韦反生产性工作行为测量方法的确认性因素分析研究
方向:反生产性工作行为(CWB)如果不加以管理,会对组织产生有害影响。研究目的:本研究的主要目的是在津巴布韦样本中测试工作场所偏差量表(WDS)的心理测量特性:研究动机:欧洲开发的工作场所偏差量表是一种广泛使用的调查问卷。因此,有必要在津巴布韦样本中评估 WDS 的信度和结构效度:采用定量研究设计。总共有 304 名方便选出的参与者填写了用于测量 CWB 的 WDS。对数据进行了项目、维度和确证因子分析(CFA):WDS的两个分量表都具有较高的信度系数。两个分量表都达到了判别效度。通过 CFA,发现一阶、二阶以及双因素和单因素测量模型与数据有合理的模型拟合:贡献/增值:贡献/增值:本研究通过确认 WDS 的心理测量特性,促进了准确、可靠和有效工具在津巴布韦的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信