The War on Crime and the War on Rape: The LEAA and Philadelphia WOAR, 1974–1984

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Caitlin Reed Wiesner
{"title":"The War on Crime and the War on Rape: The LEAA and Philadelphia WOAR, 1974–1984","authors":"Caitlin Reed Wiesner","doi":"10.1017/mah.2023.65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article uses Philadelphia Women Organized Against Rape (WOAR) as a case study to examine the intertwining of the feminist movement against sexual violence and state crime control agencies during the 1970s “war on crime.” Law Enforcement Assistant Administration (LEAA) officials expected the anti-rape organizers they subsidized to promote police reporting to the victims they served. This sharply contracted the terrain of feminist anti-rape activism, particularly for women of color who declined police reporting. Lynn Moncrief, a self-described “Black radical feminist” hired by Philadelphia WOAR using LEAA funds, rejected the mandate to increase police reporting rates. Instead, she devoted her energies to remaking WOAR's praxis with Black women and girls at the center. While LEAA funding tethered the anti-rape movement to the rapidly expanding carceral state of the late twentieth century, the example of Lynn Moncrief and the Third World Caucus of Philadelphia WOAR shows that cooptation was never total.","PeriodicalId":36673,"journal":{"name":"Modern American History","volume":"36 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern American History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/mah.2023.65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article uses Philadelphia Women Organized Against Rape (WOAR) as a case study to examine the intertwining of the feminist movement against sexual violence and state crime control agencies during the 1970s “war on crime.” Law Enforcement Assistant Administration (LEAA) officials expected the anti-rape organizers they subsidized to promote police reporting to the victims they served. This sharply contracted the terrain of feminist anti-rape activism, particularly for women of color who declined police reporting. Lynn Moncrief, a self-described “Black radical feminist” hired by Philadelphia WOAR using LEAA funds, rejected the mandate to increase police reporting rates. Instead, she devoted her energies to remaking WOAR's praxis with Black women and girls at the center. While LEAA funding tethered the anti-rape movement to the rapidly expanding carceral state of the late twentieth century, the example of Lynn Moncrief and the Third World Caucus of Philadelphia WOAR shows that cooptation was never total.
反犯罪战争和反强奸战争:LEAA 和费城 WOAR,1974-1984 年
本文以费城妇女反强奸组织(WOAR)为案例,研究了 20 世纪 70 年代 "反犯罪战争 "期间女权主义反性暴力运动与州犯罪控制机构之间的相互交织。执法助理管理局(LEAA)的官员希望他们资助的反强奸组织者能够促进他们所服务的受害者报案。这大大缩小了女权主义反强奸活动的范围,尤其是对拒绝报警的有色人种女性而言。琳恩-蒙克里夫(Lynn Moncrief)是费城 WOAR 使用 LEAA 资金聘请的一名自称为 "黑人激进女权主义者 "的人,她拒绝接受提高报警率的任务。相反,她将精力投入到以黑人妇女和女孩为中心重塑 WOAR 的实践活动中。虽然 LEAA 的资金将反强奸运动与 20 世纪末迅速扩张的监禁国家联系在一起,但 Lynn Moncrief 和费城 WOAR 第三世界核心小组的例子表明,合作从来都不是完全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Modern American History
Modern American History Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信