The Effects of Robot Chef Anthropomorphizm and Power on Consumer’s Taste Judgment: Focusing on the Mediation Effect of Perceived Flexibility

Ji-Hye Lee, Jeong-Gyu Lee
{"title":"The Effects of Robot Chef Anthropomorphizm and Power on Consumer’s Taste Judgment: Focusing on the Mediation Effect of Perceived Flexibility","authors":"Ji-Hye Lee, Jeong-Gyu Lee","doi":"10.47584/jfm.2024.27.1.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of the study is to examine the impact of the anthropomorphism of a robot chef and consumers' psychological power levels on consumers’ taste expectations in a restaurant setting. As robot chefs becomes popular in the dining industry, consumers may rely on the robot's appearance as an extrinsic cue to judge food quality. Anthropomorphism tends to be higher among consumers with low psychological power levels, driven by a desire to compensate for power deficiency through non-human entities. Conversely, high-power consumers exhibit lower intention to rely on anthropomorphism. Two lab experiments are conducted to test the hypotheses. The results reveal that psychological power moderates the influence of anthropomorphism on taste expectations. Low-power consumers expect more flexible and tastier food from an anthropomorphized robot chef. However, this effect is diminished for high-power consumers. These findings provide practical insights into the interplay between psychological power, anthropomorphism, and taste expectations in the context of robot chefs in the dining industry.","PeriodicalId":378363,"journal":{"name":"Foodservice Management Society of Korea","volume":"54 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foodservice Management Society of Korea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47584/jfm.2024.27.1.101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goal of the study is to examine the impact of the anthropomorphism of a robot chef and consumers' psychological power levels on consumers’ taste expectations in a restaurant setting. As robot chefs becomes popular in the dining industry, consumers may rely on the robot's appearance as an extrinsic cue to judge food quality. Anthropomorphism tends to be higher among consumers with low psychological power levels, driven by a desire to compensate for power deficiency through non-human entities. Conversely, high-power consumers exhibit lower intention to rely on anthropomorphism. Two lab experiments are conducted to test the hypotheses. The results reveal that psychological power moderates the influence of anthropomorphism on taste expectations. Low-power consumers expect more flexible and tastier food from an anthropomorphized robot chef. However, this effect is diminished for high-power consumers. These findings provide practical insights into the interplay between psychological power, anthropomorphism, and taste expectations in the context of robot chefs in the dining industry.
机器人厨师的拟人化和力量对消费者口味判断的影响:关注感知灵活性的中介效应
本研究的目的是探讨机器人厨师的拟人化和消费者的心理力量水平对消费者在餐厅环境中的口味预期的影响。随着机器人厨师在餐饮业的流行,消费者可能会依赖机器人的外观作为判断食物质量的外在线索。心理权力水平低的消费者往往更倾向于拟人化,因为他们希望通过非人类实体来弥补权力的不足。相反,高权力消费者依赖拟人化的意愿较低。为了验证上述假设,我们进行了两项实验室实验。结果表明,心理力量调节了拟人化对品味预期的影响。低能力消费者期望拟人化的机器人厨师能提供更灵活、更美味的食物。然而,这种影响对高能量消费者来说则有所减弱。这些发现为餐饮业中机器人厨师的心理权力、拟人化和口味预期之间的相互作用提供了实用的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信