Assessing scholarly communication competence in Zambian library professionals

A. Subaveerapandiyan, Priyanka Sinha
{"title":"Assessing scholarly communication competence in Zambian library professionals","authors":"A. Subaveerapandiyan, Priyanka Sinha","doi":"10.1108/gkmc-09-2023-0351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to assess the scholarly communication competence of Zambian library and information science (LIS) professionals by evaluating their awareness, knowledge and practices regarding scholarly publication.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nApplying a quantitative research approach, the study used a specially designed questionnaire. Responses from 57 professionals across universities and colleges in Zambia were gathered using convenience sampling. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, mean and standard deviation calculations and t-values and p-values to understand respondents’ perceptions and knowledge of scholarly communication and publication.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings revealed significant gaps in respondents’ knowledge and awareness, particularly regarding predatory journals, journal selection factors, open-access models, publication challenges, reference management software (RMS) usage and research obstacles. The study underscored the necessity for increased training and capacity-building initiatives among Zambian LIS professionals to enhance their scholarly communication competence.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis research contributed to the field by highlighting deficiencies in scholarly communication awareness among Zambian LIS professionals. It emphasised the need for targeted interventions, awareness programs and educational support to improve academic literacy and scholarly publication practices. Additionally, the study suggested future research avenues, such as longitudinal studies and strategies for enhancing RMS adoption, to advance scholarly practices among Zambian professionals further.\n","PeriodicalId":507843,"journal":{"name":"Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication","volume":"21 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/gkmc-09-2023-0351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to assess the scholarly communication competence of Zambian library and information science (LIS) professionals by evaluating their awareness, knowledge and practices regarding scholarly publication. Design/methodology/approach Applying a quantitative research approach, the study used a specially designed questionnaire. Responses from 57 professionals across universities and colleges in Zambia were gathered using convenience sampling. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, mean and standard deviation calculations and t-values and p-values to understand respondents’ perceptions and knowledge of scholarly communication and publication. Findings The findings revealed significant gaps in respondents’ knowledge and awareness, particularly regarding predatory journals, journal selection factors, open-access models, publication challenges, reference management software (RMS) usage and research obstacles. The study underscored the necessity for increased training and capacity-building initiatives among Zambian LIS professionals to enhance their scholarly communication competence. Originality/value This research contributed to the field by highlighting deficiencies in scholarly communication awareness among Zambian LIS professionals. It emphasised the need for targeted interventions, awareness programs and educational support to improve academic literacy and scholarly publication practices. Additionally, the study suggested future research avenues, such as longitudinal studies and strategies for enhancing RMS adoption, to advance scholarly practices among Zambian professionals further.
评估赞比亚图书馆专业人员的学术交流能力
目的 本研究旨在通过评估赞比亚图书馆和信息科学(LIS)专业人员对学术出版的认识、知识和实践,评估他们的学术交流能力。采用便利抽样法从赞比亚各大学和学院的 57 名专业人员中收集了答复。数据分析包括描述性统计、平均值和标准差计算、t 值和 p 值,以了解受访者对学术交流和出版的看法和认识。研究结果研究结果显示,受访者在知识和认识方面存在重大差距,尤其是在掠夺性期刊、期刊选择因素、开放获取模式、出版挑战、参考文献管理软件 (RMS) 使用和研究障碍方面。该研究强调,有必要加强对赞比亚图书情报专业人员的培训和能力建设,以提高他们的学术交流能力。 原创性/价值 该研究通过强调赞比亚图书情报专业人员在学术交流意识方面的不足,为该领域做出了贡献。它强调了有必要采取有针对性的干预措施、提高认识计划和教育支持,以提高学术素养和学术出版实践。此外,研究还提出了未来的研究途径,如纵向研究和加强采用 RMS 的战略,以进一步推动赞比亚专业人员的学术实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信