Investigating engagement and burnout of gig-workers in the age of algorithms: an empirical study in digital labor platforms

Nastaran Hajiheydari, Mohammad Soltani Delgosha
{"title":"Investigating engagement and burnout of gig-workers in the age of algorithms: an empirical study in digital labor platforms","authors":"Nastaran Hajiheydari, Mohammad Soltani Delgosha","doi":"10.1108/itp-11-2022-0873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeDigital labor platforms (DLPs) are transforming the nature of the work for an increasing number of workers, especially through extensively employing automated algorithms for performing managerial functions. In this novel working setting – characterized by algorithmic governance, and automatic matching, rewarding and punishing mechanisms – gig-workers play an essential role in providing on-demand services for final customers. Since gig-workers’ continued participation is crucial for sustainable service delivery in platform contexts, this study aims to identify and examine the antecedents of their working outcomes, including burnout and engagement.Design/methodology/approachWe suggested a theoretical framework, grounded in the job demands-resources heuristic model to investigate how the interplay of job demands and resources, resulting from working in DLPs, explains gig-workers’ engagement and burnout. We further empirically tested the proposed model to understand how DLPs' working conditions, in particular their algorithmic management, impact gig-working outcomes.FindingsOur findings indicate that job resources – algorithmic compensation, work autonomy and information sharing– have significant positive effects on gig-workers’ engagement. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that job insecurity, unsupportive algorithmic interaction (UAI) and algorithmic injustice significantly contribute to gig-workers’ burnout. Notably, we found that job resources substantially, but differently, moderate the relationship between job demands and gig-workers’ burnout.Originality/valueThis study contributes a theoretically accurate and empirically grounded understanding of two clusters of conditions – job demands and resources– as a result of algorithmic management practice in DLPs. We developed nuanced insights into how such conditions are evaluated by gig-workers and shape their engagement or burnout in DLP emerging work settings. We further uncovered that in gig-working context, resources do not similarly buffer against the negative effects of job demands.","PeriodicalId":504906,"journal":{"name":"Information Technology & People","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Technology & People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-11-2022-0873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeDigital labor platforms (DLPs) are transforming the nature of the work for an increasing number of workers, especially through extensively employing automated algorithms for performing managerial functions. In this novel working setting – characterized by algorithmic governance, and automatic matching, rewarding and punishing mechanisms – gig-workers play an essential role in providing on-demand services for final customers. Since gig-workers’ continued participation is crucial for sustainable service delivery in platform contexts, this study aims to identify and examine the antecedents of their working outcomes, including burnout and engagement.Design/methodology/approachWe suggested a theoretical framework, grounded in the job demands-resources heuristic model to investigate how the interplay of job demands and resources, resulting from working in DLPs, explains gig-workers’ engagement and burnout. We further empirically tested the proposed model to understand how DLPs' working conditions, in particular their algorithmic management, impact gig-working outcomes.FindingsOur findings indicate that job resources – algorithmic compensation, work autonomy and information sharing– have significant positive effects on gig-workers’ engagement. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that job insecurity, unsupportive algorithmic interaction (UAI) and algorithmic injustice significantly contribute to gig-workers’ burnout. Notably, we found that job resources substantially, but differently, moderate the relationship between job demands and gig-workers’ burnout.Originality/valueThis study contributes a theoretically accurate and empirically grounded understanding of two clusters of conditions – job demands and resources– as a result of algorithmic management practice in DLPs. We developed nuanced insights into how such conditions are evaluated by gig-workers and shape their engagement or burnout in DLP emerging work settings. We further uncovered that in gig-working context, resources do not similarly buffer against the negative effects of job demands.
调查算法时代临时工的参与度和职业倦怠:数字劳动平台的实证研究
目的数字劳动平台(DLP)正在改变越来越多工人的工作性质,特别是通过广泛采用自动算法来履行管理职能。在这种以算法管理、自动匹配和奖惩机制为特征的新型工作环境中,"零工 "在为最终客户提供按需服务方面发挥着至关重要的作用。由于临时工的持续参与对于平台背景下可持续服务的提供至关重要,本研究旨在识别和研究其工作结果的前因,包括职业倦怠和敬业度。设计/方法/方法我们提出了一个理论框架,该框架以工作需求-资源启发式模型为基础,研究在DLPs工作所产生的工作需求和资源的相互作用如何解释临时工的敬业度和职业倦怠。我们进一步对所提出的模型进行了实证检验,以了解DLP的工作条件,尤其是其算法管理,是如何影响临时工的工作结果的。研究结果我们的研究结果表明,工作资源--算法补偿、工作自主权和信息共享--对临时工的敬业度有显著的积极影响。此外,我们的研究结果表明,工作不安全感、不支持性算法互动(UAI)和算法不公正在很大程度上导致了临时工的职业倦怠。值得注意的是,我们发现工作资源在很大程度上缓和了工作需求与临时工职业倦怠之间的关系,但两者之间存在差异。我们从细微处了解到,在DLP新兴工作环境中,这些条件是如何被 "零工 "评估并影响他们的参与度或倦怠感的。我们进一步发现,在临时工的工作环境中,资源并不能对工作要求的负面影响起到类似的缓冲作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信