Societal attitudes towards psychiatric patients, medication, and the antipsychiatric movement within the context of theoretical approaches and inclusion initiatives. Τhe role of mental health professionals

Alexandros Argyriadis, Agathi Argyriadi
{"title":"Societal attitudes towards psychiatric patients, medication, and the antipsychiatric movement within the context of theoretical approaches and inclusion initiatives. Τhe role of mental health professionals","authors":"Alexandros Argyriadis, Agathi Argyriadi","doi":"10.30574/gscarr.2024.18.2.0075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Studies examining the cultural and societal factors that shape perceptions of psychiatric patients and medication are gaining prominence. These studies investigate how cultural beliefs, values, and norms influence attitudes towards mental illness and treatment-seeking behavior, with a focus on addressing cultural barriers to care. Aim: The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive review of literature on these interconnected topics and to analyze the evolving landscape of attitudes towards mental illness within society. Methods: To comprehensively examine the topic, a rigorous literature review approach was utilized. This involved systematically searching and analyzing a wide range of scholarly articles, reviews, and meta-analyses from high-impact factor journals. The search process involved accessing academic databases and employing search strings to ensure inclusivity and relevance of the gathered literature. This methodological approach allowed for the identification and synthesis of key insights, trends, and findings pertaining to the subject matter, providing a robust foundation for the subsequent analysis and discussion. Results: The results reveal a diverse array of perspectives on psychiatric patients, ranging from stigma and discrimination to advocacy for human rights and empowerment. Furthermore, the analysis highlights the impact of the antipsychiatric movement on shaping societal attitudes towards psychiatric treatment and the broader conceptualization of mental illness. Conclusions: Conclusions drawn from this review underscore the importance of addressing stigma, promoting patient-centered care, and fostering inclusivity within mental health discourse and policy.","PeriodicalId":12791,"journal":{"name":"GSC Advanced Research and Reviews","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GSC Advanced Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2024.18.2.0075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Studies examining the cultural and societal factors that shape perceptions of psychiatric patients and medication are gaining prominence. These studies investigate how cultural beliefs, values, and norms influence attitudes towards mental illness and treatment-seeking behavior, with a focus on addressing cultural barriers to care. Aim: The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive review of literature on these interconnected topics and to analyze the evolving landscape of attitudes towards mental illness within society. Methods: To comprehensively examine the topic, a rigorous literature review approach was utilized. This involved systematically searching and analyzing a wide range of scholarly articles, reviews, and meta-analyses from high-impact factor journals. The search process involved accessing academic databases and employing search strings to ensure inclusivity and relevance of the gathered literature. This methodological approach allowed for the identification and synthesis of key insights, trends, and findings pertaining to the subject matter, providing a robust foundation for the subsequent analysis and discussion. Results: The results reveal a diverse array of perspectives on psychiatric patients, ranging from stigma and discrimination to advocacy for human rights and empowerment. Furthermore, the analysis highlights the impact of the antipsychiatric movement on shaping societal attitudes towards psychiatric treatment and the broader conceptualization of mental illness. Conclusions: Conclusions drawn from this review underscore the importance of addressing stigma, promoting patient-centered care, and fostering inclusivity within mental health discourse and policy.
在理论方法和包容倡议的背景下,社会对精神病患者、药物治疗和反精神病运动的态度。心理健康专业人员的作用
背景:对影响精神病患者和药物治疗观念的文化和社会因素的研究越来越受到重视。这些研究调查了文化信仰、价值观和规范是如何影响人们对精神疾病的态度和寻求治疗的行为的,重点是解决文化障碍对治疗的影响。目的:本研究旨在全面回顾有关这些相互关联主题的文献,并分析社会中人们对精神疾病态度的演变情况。研究方法为了全面研究该主题,我们采用了严格的文献综述方法。这包括系统地搜索和分析来自高影响因子期刊的大量学术文章、评论和荟萃分析。搜索过程包括访问学术数据库和使用搜索字符串,以确保所收集文献的包容性和相关性。这种方法有助于识别和综合与主题相关的关键见解、趋势和发现,为随后的分析和讨论奠定坚实的基础。结果结果表明,人们对精神病患者的看法多种多样,从污名化和歧视到倡导人权和赋权,不一而足。此外,分析还强调了反精神病运动对塑造社会对精神病治疗和更广泛的精神疾病概念的态度所产生的影响。结论:从本综述中得出的结论强调了在心理健康讨论和政策中解决污名化问题、促进以患者为中心的护理以及培养包容性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信