Societal attitudes towards psychiatric patients, medication, and the antipsychiatric movement within the context of theoretical approaches and inclusion initiatives. Τhe role of mental health professionals
{"title":"Societal attitudes towards psychiatric patients, medication, and the antipsychiatric movement within the context of theoretical approaches and inclusion initiatives. Τhe role of mental health professionals","authors":"Alexandros Argyriadis, Agathi Argyriadi","doi":"10.30574/gscarr.2024.18.2.0075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Studies examining the cultural and societal factors that shape perceptions of psychiatric patients and medication are gaining prominence. These studies investigate how cultural beliefs, values, and norms influence attitudes towards mental illness and treatment-seeking behavior, with a focus on addressing cultural barriers to care. Aim: The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive review of literature on these interconnected topics and to analyze the evolving landscape of attitudes towards mental illness within society. Methods: To comprehensively examine the topic, a rigorous literature review approach was utilized. This involved systematically searching and analyzing a wide range of scholarly articles, reviews, and meta-analyses from high-impact factor journals. The search process involved accessing academic databases and employing search strings to ensure inclusivity and relevance of the gathered literature. This methodological approach allowed for the identification and synthesis of key insights, trends, and findings pertaining to the subject matter, providing a robust foundation for the subsequent analysis and discussion. Results: The results reveal a diverse array of perspectives on psychiatric patients, ranging from stigma and discrimination to advocacy for human rights and empowerment. Furthermore, the analysis highlights the impact of the antipsychiatric movement on shaping societal attitudes towards psychiatric treatment and the broader conceptualization of mental illness. Conclusions: Conclusions drawn from this review underscore the importance of addressing stigma, promoting patient-centered care, and fostering inclusivity within mental health discourse and policy.","PeriodicalId":12791,"journal":{"name":"GSC Advanced Research and Reviews","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GSC Advanced Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2024.18.2.0075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Studies examining the cultural and societal factors that shape perceptions of psychiatric patients and medication are gaining prominence. These studies investigate how cultural beliefs, values, and norms influence attitudes towards mental illness and treatment-seeking behavior, with a focus on addressing cultural barriers to care. Aim: The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive review of literature on these interconnected topics and to analyze the evolving landscape of attitudes towards mental illness within society. Methods: To comprehensively examine the topic, a rigorous literature review approach was utilized. This involved systematically searching and analyzing a wide range of scholarly articles, reviews, and meta-analyses from high-impact factor journals. The search process involved accessing academic databases and employing search strings to ensure inclusivity and relevance of the gathered literature. This methodological approach allowed for the identification and synthesis of key insights, trends, and findings pertaining to the subject matter, providing a robust foundation for the subsequent analysis and discussion. Results: The results reveal a diverse array of perspectives on psychiatric patients, ranging from stigma and discrimination to advocacy for human rights and empowerment. Furthermore, the analysis highlights the impact of the antipsychiatric movement on shaping societal attitudes towards psychiatric treatment and the broader conceptualization of mental illness. Conclusions: Conclusions drawn from this review underscore the importance of addressing stigma, promoting patient-centered care, and fostering inclusivity within mental health discourse and policy.