Performance and Microbial Community analysis on denitrification of electronic wastewater using various External Carbon Source

Hyunjun Song, Taegeun Kim, HyeonJung Cha, SungYeop Jung
{"title":"Performance and Microbial Community analysis on denitrification of electronic wastewater using various External Carbon Source","authors":"Hyunjun Song, Taegeun Kim, HyeonJung Cha, SungYeop Jung","doi":"10.4491/ksee.2024.46.2.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives:In the biological denitrification process of electronic wastewater, the denitrification performance of various types of external carbon sources and the changes in the bacterial community before and after denitrification were evaluated through NGS analysis.Methods:After selecting 6 types of external carbon sources, the concentration of nitrate nitrogen was analyzed for 6 hours under anoxic conditions with a C/N ratio of 4 to evaluate the denitrification rate, and the changes in the community distribution of bacteria before and after denitrification were confirmed through NGS analysis.Results and Discussion:As a result of comparing the denitrification performance of various external carbon sources, Ethylene glycol(EG) was the best at 79.9% after 6 hours, and the specific denitrification rate(SDNR) was 1.000mg NO3--N removal/g MLVSS·hr. The bacterial community change using NGS was distributed more than 90% of 10 phylums at the phylum level, and Proteobacteria, Saccharibacteria, and Chloroflexi were dominant, and among them, Saccharibacteria<</i> and Chloroflexi were confirmed to be bacteria contributing to denitrification. At class and genus level, when a external carbon source was added, the number of γ-proteobacteria increased in all experimental conditions, but the distribution of denitrifying bacteria was less than 1.27%, indicating that various bacteria contributed to denitrification. Conclusion:In the case of Ethylene glycol(EG), it is judged that it can be used as an external carbon source, and there was no significant change in the community depending on the type of carbon source injected, and various bacteria such as and Chloroflexi contributed to denitrification and eliminated nitrogen pollutants.","PeriodicalId":16127,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Engineers","volume":"88 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4491/ksee.2024.46.2.48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives:In the biological denitrification process of electronic wastewater, the denitrification performance of various types of external carbon sources and the changes in the bacterial community before and after denitrification were evaluated through NGS analysis.Methods:After selecting 6 types of external carbon sources, the concentration of nitrate nitrogen was analyzed for 6 hours under anoxic conditions with a C/N ratio of 4 to evaluate the denitrification rate, and the changes in the community distribution of bacteria before and after denitrification were confirmed through NGS analysis.Results and Discussion:As a result of comparing the denitrification performance of various external carbon sources, Ethylene glycol(EG) was the best at 79.9% after 6 hours, and the specific denitrification rate(SDNR) was 1.000mg NO3--N removal/g MLVSS·hr. The bacterial community change using NGS was distributed more than 90% of 10 phylums at the phylum level, and Proteobacteria, Saccharibacteria, and Chloroflexi were dominant, and among them, Saccharibacteria< and Chloroflexi were confirmed to be bacteria contributing to denitrification. At class and genus level, when a external carbon source was added, the number of γ-proteobacteria increased in all experimental conditions, but the distribution of denitrifying bacteria was less than 1.27%, indicating that various bacteria contributed to denitrification. Conclusion:In the case of Ethylene glycol(EG), it is judged that it can be used as an external carbon source, and there was no significant change in the community depending on the type of carbon source injected, and various bacteria such as and Chloroflexi contributed to denitrification and eliminated nitrogen pollutants.
利用各种外部碳源对电子废水进行脱氮处理的性能和微生物群落分析
目的:在电子废水的生物反硝化过程中,通过NGS分析评价各种外部碳源的反硝化性能以及反硝化前后细菌群落的变化。方法:选择 6 种外部碳源后,在 C/N 比为 4 的缺氧条件下分析 6 小时的硝态氮浓度,评价反硝化率,并通过 NGS 分析确认反硝化前后细菌群落分布的变化。结果与讨论:通过比较各种外部碳源的反硝化性能,乙二醇(EG)的反硝化效果最好,6小时后达到79.9%,比反硝化率(SDNR)为1.000mg NO3--N去除率/g MLVSS-hr。利用 NGS 进行的细菌群落变化显示,在门级的 10 个门中,90% 以上的细菌群落分布在 10 个门中,蛋白细菌、酵母菌和绿僵菌占优势,其中酵母菌和绿僵菌被确认为有助于反硝化的细菌。在类和属的水平上,当添加外部碳源时,所有实验条件下的γ-蛋白细菌数量都有所增加,但反硝化细菌的分布却小于 1.27%,这表明各种细菌都对反硝化做出了贡献。结论:在乙二醇(EG)的情况下,可以判断它可以用作外部碳源,而且群落并没有因注入碳源的类型而发生显著变化,各种细菌,如和Chloroflexi,都对反硝化和消除氮污染物做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信