Diagnostics and Assessment of the Severity of Alzheimer’s Disease: Machine Learning Algorithms Based on Markers of Inflammation

L. V. Androsova, A. Simonov, O. V. Senko, N. M. Mikhaylova, A. V. Kuznetsova, T. Klyushnik
{"title":"Diagnostics and Assessment of the Severity of Alzheimer’s Disease: Machine Learning Algorithms Based on Markers of Inflammation","authors":"L. V. Androsova, A. Simonov, O. V. Senko, N. M. Mikhaylova, A. V. Kuznetsova, T. Klyushnik","doi":"10.30629/2618-6667-2024-22-1-6-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: as the most common form of dementia, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized by cognitive deterioration and usually begins with loss of memory of recent events. It is important to search for biological, sensitive and affordable methods that could be used for early diagnostics of AD and determine the severity of the disease.Objective: to develop machine learning algorithms based on such inflammatory markers as the enzymatic activity of leukocyte elastase (LE) and the functional activity of the α1-proteinase inhibitor (α1-PI) for diagnosing and assessing the severity of AD.Patients and methods: the study included128 people aged 55 to 94 years (73.7 ± 7.9 years), of which 91 patients were diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease and 37 apparently healthy people (control). The indicators of LE and α1-PI in blood plasma were used as classifying features for building models. The following algorithms were used to build a machine learning model: Optimal Valid Partition (OVP), logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), gradient boosting (GB) and statistically weighted syndromes (WSWS). The predictive performance of the constructed classiers was evaluated by the overall accuracy (accuracy), sensitivity (sensitivity), specificity (specificity), F-measure and ROC-analysis.Results: the developed machine learning algorithms made it possible to reliably divide the general group of subjects (patients + conditionally healthy), as well as patients with different AD severity, into 4 quadrants of a two-dimensional diagram in the LE and α1-PI coordinates and showed close and fairly high predictive efficiency.Conclusion: the developed machine learning algorithms have proven close and sufficiently high prognostic efficacy for assessing the severity of AD based on inflammatory markers (enzymatic activity of LE and functional activity of α1-PI) and, probably, can be useful for early diagnostics of the disease and timely administration of therapy.","PeriodicalId":516298,"journal":{"name":"Psikhiatriya","volume":"2000 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psikhiatriya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30629/2618-6667-2024-22-1-6-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: as the most common form of dementia, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized by cognitive deterioration and usually begins with loss of memory of recent events. It is important to search for biological, sensitive and affordable methods that could be used for early diagnostics of AD and determine the severity of the disease.Objective: to develop machine learning algorithms based on such inflammatory markers as the enzymatic activity of leukocyte elastase (LE) and the functional activity of the α1-proteinase inhibitor (α1-PI) for diagnosing and assessing the severity of AD.Patients and methods: the study included128 people aged 55 to 94 years (73.7 ± 7.9 years), of which 91 patients were diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease and 37 apparently healthy people (control). The indicators of LE and α1-PI in blood plasma were used as classifying features for building models. The following algorithms were used to build a machine learning model: Optimal Valid Partition (OVP), logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), gradient boosting (GB) and statistically weighted syndromes (WSWS). The predictive performance of the constructed classiers was evaluated by the overall accuracy (accuracy), sensitivity (sensitivity), specificity (specificity), F-measure and ROC-analysis.Results: the developed machine learning algorithms made it possible to reliably divide the general group of subjects (patients + conditionally healthy), as well as patients with different AD severity, into 4 quadrants of a two-dimensional diagram in the LE and α1-PI coordinates and showed close and fairly high predictive efficiency.Conclusion: the developed machine learning algorithms have proven close and sufficiently high prognostic efficacy for assessing the severity of AD based on inflammatory markers (enzymatic activity of LE and functional activity of α1-PI) and, probably, can be useful for early diagnostics of the disease and timely administration of therapy.
诊断和评估阿尔茨海默病的严重程度:基于炎症标记的机器学习算法
背景:作为最常见的痴呆症,阿尔茨海默病(AD)的特点是认知能力退化,通常以丧失对近期事件的记忆开始。目的:根据白细胞弹性蛋白酶(LE)的酶活性和α1-蛋白酶抑制剂(α1-PI)的功能活性等炎症标志物开发机器学习算法,用于诊断和评估阿尔茨海默病的严重程度。患者和方法:研究对象包括128名年龄在55至94岁(73.7 ± 7.9岁)的患者,其中91名患者被诊断为阿尔茨海默病,37名患者为表面健康者(对照组)。血浆中的 LE 和 α1-PI 指标被用作建立模型的分类特征。建立机器学习模型时使用了以下算法:最佳有效分区(OVP)、逻辑回归(LR)、支持向量机(SVM)、随机森林(RF)、梯度提升(GB)和统计加权综合征(WSWS)。结果表明:所开发的机器学习算法可以在 LE 和 α1-PI 坐标的二维图表中将一般受试者群体(患者 + 条件健康者)以及不同 AD 严重程度的患者可靠地划分为 4 个象限,并显示出接近和相当高的预测效率。结论:事实证明,所开发的机器学习算法在根据炎症标志物(LE 的酶活性和 α1-PI 的功能活性)评估注意力缺失症严重程度方面具有接近和足够高的预后效力,可能有助于疾病的早期诊断和及时治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信