Psychological distress and PTSD among clinicians in Roma, Lesotho during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Muila Kambulandu, Radiance M. Ogundipe, Mariel Bryden, Lebohang Sao, Dave M. Thompson, Chelsea M. McGuire, Brian W. Jack
{"title":"Psychological distress and PTSD among clinicians in Roma, Lesotho during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Muila Kambulandu, Radiance M. Ogundipe, Mariel Bryden, Lebohang Sao, Dave M. Thompson, Chelsea M. McGuire, Brian W. Jack","doi":"10.4102/safp.v66i1.5785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Since 2020, the world has been battling the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The mortality and morbidity at the height of the pandemic sparked generalised fear and uncertainty about the future. Concerns were raised about the psychological impact of the pandemic on workers in healthcare systems globally. This study was conducted to establish the degree of psychological impact of the pandemic on frontline health workers in Lesotho. Methods The study used a quantitative cross-sectional survey design. The Kessler psychological distress screening tool (K-10) and the post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) checklist for civilians (PCL-C) were administered to screen for psychological distress among clinical staff at St. Joseph’s Hospital in Roma and its four Health Centres. Additional open- and closed-ended questions were added for context. Data were analysed using Fisher’s exact tests, Pearson chi-square tests and correlation studies. Results Of the 101 participants, 42 (41.6%) scored ≥ 24 on the K-10 scale (95% CI: 32.0% – 51.2%) indicating moderate to severe psychological distress and 32 (31.7%) scored ≥ 50 on the PCL-C checklist suggesting severe PTSD (95% CI: 24.5% – 42.9%). High scores on the K-10 were found more among men than women (17 [37.8%] vs. 4 [7.1%]; p ≤ 0.001). Post-traumatic stress disorder was more in the younger age group (p ≤ 0.03), in those reporting anxiety (p = 0.005) and those with more co-morbidities (p ≤ 0.001). Conclusion This study revealed the grave psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on frontline clinical health workers in Lesotho. Contribution These data will assist health leaders and policymakers to implement mental health support interventions for health workers in future.","PeriodicalId":22040,"journal":{"name":"South African Family Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Family Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v66i1.5785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Since 2020, the world has been battling the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The mortality and morbidity at the height of the pandemic sparked generalised fear and uncertainty about the future. Concerns were raised about the psychological impact of the pandemic on workers in healthcare systems globally. This study was conducted to establish the degree of psychological impact of the pandemic on frontline health workers in Lesotho. Methods The study used a quantitative cross-sectional survey design. The Kessler psychological distress screening tool (K-10) and the post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) checklist for civilians (PCL-C) were administered to screen for psychological distress among clinical staff at St. Joseph’s Hospital in Roma and its four Health Centres. Additional open- and closed-ended questions were added for context. Data were analysed using Fisher’s exact tests, Pearson chi-square tests and correlation studies. Results Of the 101 participants, 42 (41.6%) scored ≥ 24 on the K-10 scale (95% CI: 32.0% – 51.2%) indicating moderate to severe psychological distress and 32 (31.7%) scored ≥ 50 on the PCL-C checklist suggesting severe PTSD (95% CI: 24.5% – 42.9%). High scores on the K-10 were found more among men than women (17 [37.8%] vs. 4 [7.1%]; p ≤ 0.001). Post-traumatic stress disorder was more in the younger age group (p ≤ 0.03), in those reporting anxiety (p = 0.005) and those with more co-morbidities (p ≤ 0.001). Conclusion This study revealed the grave psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on frontline clinical health workers in Lesotho. Contribution These data will assist health leaders and policymakers to implement mental health support interventions for health workers in future.
莱索托罗姆的临床医生在 COVID-19 大流行期间的心理困扰和创伤后应激障碍
背景自 2020 年以来,全球一直在与 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行作斗争。疫情高峰期的死亡率和发病率引发了对未来的普遍恐惧和不确定性。疫情对全球医疗保健系统工作人员的心理影响引起了关注。本研究旨在确定大流行病对莱索托一线医疗工作者的心理影响程度。研究方法 本研究采用定量横断面调查设计。研究人员使用凯斯勒心理困扰筛查工具(K-10)和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)平民检查表(PCL-C),对罗马圣约瑟夫医院及其四个医疗中心的临床医护人员进行心理困扰筛查。此外,还增加了开放式和封闭式问题,以了解相关情况。数据分析采用费雪精确检验、皮尔逊卡方检验和相关研究。结果 在 101 名参与者中,42 人(41.6%)在 K-10 量表中得分≥ 24 分(95% CI:32.0% - 51.2%),表明存在中度至重度心理困扰;32 人(31.7%)在 PCL-C 检查表中得分≥ 50 分,表明存在重度创伤后应激障碍(95% CI:24.5% - 42.9%)。在 K-10 中,男性的高分率高于女性(17 [37.8%] vs. 4 [7.1%];P ≤ 0.001)。创伤后应激障碍多见于年轻群体(p ≤ 0.03)、焦虑群体(p = 0.005)和合并症较多的群体(p ≤ 0.001)。结论 本研究揭示了 COVID-19 大流行对莱索托一线临床医务工作者造成的严重心理影响。贡献 这些数据将有助于卫生领导者和政策制定者在未来为卫生工作者实施心理健康支持干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
South African Family Practice
South African Family Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: South African Family Practice (SAFP) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, which strives to provide primary care physicians and researchers with a broad range of scholarly work in the disciplines of Family Medicine, Primary Health Care, Rural Medicine, District Health and other related fields. SAFP publishes original research, clinical reviews, and pertinent commentary that advance the knowledge base of these disciplines. The content of SAFP is designed to reflect and support further development of the broad basis of these disciplines through original research and critical review of evidence in important clinical areas; as well as to provide practitioners with continuing professional development material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信