QOL-DIS: A New Assessment in Analysing the Quality of Life of Persons with Disabilities

IF 0.7 4区 综合性期刊 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
A. A. Alias, Nurul Hanis Aminuddin Jafry, Rohana Jani, M. Wong
{"title":"QOL-DIS: A New Assessment in Analysing the Quality of Life of Persons with Disabilities","authors":"A. A. Alias, Nurul Hanis Aminuddin Jafry, Rohana Jani, M. Wong","doi":"10.17576/jsm-2024-5302-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accessing and monitoring the quality of life (QoL) of persons with disabilities (PWDs) is crucial in improving their QoL. Therefore, a reliable instrument is needed for that purpose. PWDs globally demand to get involved with anything related to their affairs, as stated in the movement slogan, “Nothing about us, without us”. The WHOQOL-DIS is the instrument developed by WHO and is used widely to assess the QoL of PWDs. However, the computation method is based on the unweighted score. Hence, this study proposes an approach to assess QoL using an index based on a weighted score, which allows the PWDs to rate each item according to their expectation or level of importance. An index approach is based on the total of the cognitive and emotional reactions or experiences compared with the expectations. Robust tests, namely correlation analysis, and uncertainty and sensitivity analysis, were conducted to check the robustness of the index approach. The findings showed that an index approach is reliable in the WHOQOL-DIS instrument to assess the QoL of PWDs. Nevertheless, the QoL score between the index approach and the initial method only shows significant differences in the environment and discrimination domain. Besides, this study also suggests having a ten-point Likert scale instead of a five-point Likert scale when assessing the QoL of PWDs using an index approach.","PeriodicalId":21366,"journal":{"name":"Sains Malaysiana","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sains Malaysiana","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2024-5302-16","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accessing and monitoring the quality of life (QoL) of persons with disabilities (PWDs) is crucial in improving their QoL. Therefore, a reliable instrument is needed for that purpose. PWDs globally demand to get involved with anything related to their affairs, as stated in the movement slogan, “Nothing about us, without us”. The WHOQOL-DIS is the instrument developed by WHO and is used widely to assess the QoL of PWDs. However, the computation method is based on the unweighted score. Hence, this study proposes an approach to assess QoL using an index based on a weighted score, which allows the PWDs to rate each item according to their expectation or level of importance. An index approach is based on the total of the cognitive and emotional reactions or experiences compared with the expectations. Robust tests, namely correlation analysis, and uncertainty and sensitivity analysis, were conducted to check the robustness of the index approach. The findings showed that an index approach is reliable in the WHOQOL-DIS instrument to assess the QoL of PWDs. Nevertheless, the QoL score between the index approach and the initial method only shows significant differences in the environment and discrimination domain. Besides, this study also suggests having a ten-point Likert scale instead of a five-point Likert scale when assessing the QoL of PWDs using an index approach.
QOL-DIS:分析残疾人生活质量的新评估方法
获取和监测残疾人的生活质量(QoL)对于改善他们的生活质量至关重要。因此,需要一个可靠的工具来实现这一目的。正如 "没有我们,就没有我们 "的运动口号所指出的那样,全球残疾人都要求参与与其事务有关的任何事情。世卫 QOL-DIS 是世卫组织开发的工具,被广泛用于评估残疾人的 QoL。然而,其计算方法是基于非加权得分。因此,本研究提出一种以加权分数为基础的指数评估方法,让残疾人根据其期望或重要程度对每个项目进行评分。指数法以认知和情感反应或体验与期望值的总和为基础。我们进行了稳健性测试,即相关性分析、不确定性和敏感性分析,以检验指数法的稳健性。研究结果表明,在世界卫生组织 QoL-DIS 工具中采用指数法评估残疾人的 QoL 是可靠的。然而,指数法与初始法的 QoL 分数仅在环境和歧视领域有显著差异。此外,这项研究还建议在使用指数法评估残疾人的 QoL 时,使用十点李克特量表而不是五点李克特量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sains Malaysiana
Sains Malaysiana MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
196
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Sains Malaysiana is a refereed journal committed to the advancement of scholarly knowledge and research findings of the several branches of science and technology. It contains articles on Earth Sciences, Health Sciences, Life Sciences, Mathematical Sciences and Physical Sciences. The journal publishes articles, reviews, and research notes whose content and approach are of interest to a wide range of scholars. Sains Malaysiana is published by the UKM Press an its autonomous Editorial Board are drawn from the Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. In addition, distinguished scholars from local and foreign universities are appointed to serve as advisory board members and referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信