Soft Power & Hegemony: Gramsci, Nye, and Cox’s Perspectives

Jurnal Filsafat Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.22146/jf.87478
Rika Febriani, Irwan Hamdi
{"title":"Soft Power & Hegemony: Gramsci, Nye, and Cox’s Perspectives","authors":"Rika Febriani, Irwan Hamdi","doi":"10.22146/jf.87478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article highlights the significance of soft power and hegemony in the realms of international relations theory and political philosophy. Soft power serves as a political strategy utilized by nations to attract and shape ideas in other countries through influence and persuasion. Similarly, Antonio Gramsci's concept of hegemony emphasizes the influence of societal ideas by employing moral and intellectual leadership through consensus. In enriching this analysis, it incorporates perspectives from Robert Cox, who deepen the understanding of how hegemony intertwines with global power structures, social forces, and the construction of world order. This article provides a theoretical review of Joseph S. Nye's soft power concept and Antonio Gramsci's notion of hegemony, comparing both at the epistemological level of political science, encompassing concepts, praxis, and values. The study is based on Nye's Soft Power (2004) and Gramsci's Selections from the Prison Notebooks (2007) through a literature review. This article concludes that these concepts share similarities, such as utilizing intellectual leadership, promoting awareness within the intellectual class, and targeting civil society as a crucial influencer.","PeriodicalId":32273,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Filsafat","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Filsafat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.87478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article highlights the significance of soft power and hegemony in the realms of international relations theory and political philosophy. Soft power serves as a political strategy utilized by nations to attract and shape ideas in other countries through influence and persuasion. Similarly, Antonio Gramsci's concept of hegemony emphasizes the influence of societal ideas by employing moral and intellectual leadership through consensus. In enriching this analysis, it incorporates perspectives from Robert Cox, who deepen the understanding of how hegemony intertwines with global power structures, social forces, and the construction of world order. This article provides a theoretical review of Joseph S. Nye's soft power concept and Antonio Gramsci's notion of hegemony, comparing both at the epistemological level of political science, encompassing concepts, praxis, and values. The study is based on Nye's Soft Power (2004) and Gramsci's Selections from the Prison Notebooks (2007) through a literature review. This article concludes that these concepts share similarities, such as utilizing intellectual leadership, promoting awareness within the intellectual class, and targeting civil society as a crucial influencer.
软实力与霸权:葛兰西、奈和考克斯的观点
本文强调了软实力和霸权在国际关系理论和政治哲学领域的重要意义。软实力是国家通过影响和说服来吸引和塑造其他国家思想的一种政治策略。同样,安东尼奥-葛兰西(Antonio Gramsci)的 "霸权"(hegemony)概念强调的是通过达成共识,运用道德和思想领导力来影响社会思想。罗伯特-考克斯的观点加深了人们对霸权如何与全球权力结构、社会力量和世界秩序的构建交织在一起的理解,从而丰富了这一分析。本文对约瑟夫-奈的软实力概念和安东尼奥-葛兰西的霸权概念进行了理论评述,从政治学的认识论层面对两者进行了比较,包括概念、实践和价值观。本研究通过文献综述,以奈的《软实力》(2004 年)和葛兰西的《监狱笔记选编》(2007 年)为基础。本文的结论是,这些概念有相似之处,如利用知识分子的领导力、促进知识分子阶层的认识、将公民社会作为重要的影响者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信