Racial and socioeconomic disparities in surgical care for post-prostate cancer treatment complications: A nationwide Medicare-based analysis

IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
BJUI compass Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1002/bco2.342
Oluwafolajimi Adesanya, Sirikan Rojanasarot, Alysha M. McGovern, Arthur L. Burnett
{"title":"Racial and socioeconomic disparities in surgical care for post-prostate cancer treatment complications: A nationwide Medicare-based analysis","authors":"Oluwafolajimi Adesanya,&nbsp;Sirikan Rojanasarot,&nbsp;Alysha M. McGovern,&nbsp;Arthur L. Burnett","doi":"10.1002/bco2.342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the racial and socioeconomic (income) differences in receipt of and time to surgical care for urinary incontinence (UI) and erectile dysfunction (ED) occurring post-radical prostatectomy (RP) and/or radiation therapy (RT).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Utilizing the Medicare Standard Analytical Files (SAF), a retrospective cohort study was performed on data of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) from 2015 to 2021. Patients who underwent RP and/or RT and who subsequently developed UI and/or ED were grouped into four cohorts: RP-ED, RP-UI, RT-ED and RT-UI. County-level median household income was cross-referenced with SAF county codes, classified into income quartiles, and used as a proxy for patient income status. The rate of surgical care was compared between groups using two-sample t-test and log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards modelling was used to determine covariate-adjusted impact of race on time to surgical care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The rate of surgical care was 6.8, 3.61 3.07, and 1.54 per 100 person-years for the RP-UI, RT-UI, RP-ED, and RT-ED cohorts, respectively. Cox proportional <i>‘time-to-surgical care’</i> regression analysis revealed that Black men were statistically more likely to receive ED surgical care (RP-ED AHR:1.79, 95% CI:1.49–2.17; RT-ED AHR:1.50, 95% CI:1.11–2.01), but less likely to receive UI surgical care (RP-UI AHR:0.80, 95% CI:0.67–0.96) than White men, in all cohorts except RT-UI. Surgical care was highest among Q1 (lowest income quartile) patients in all cohorts except RT-UI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Surgical care for post-PCa treatment complications is low, and significantly impacted by racial and socioeconomic (income) differences. Prospective studies investigating the basis of these results would be insightful.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"5 6","pages":"564-575"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.342","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the racial and socioeconomic (income) differences in receipt of and time to surgical care for urinary incontinence (UI) and erectile dysfunction (ED) occurring post-radical prostatectomy (RP) and/or radiation therapy (RT).

Materials and Methods

Utilizing the Medicare Standard Analytical Files (SAF), a retrospective cohort study was performed on data of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) from 2015 to 2021. Patients who underwent RP and/or RT and who subsequently developed UI and/or ED were grouped into four cohorts: RP-ED, RP-UI, RT-ED and RT-UI. County-level median household income was cross-referenced with SAF county codes, classified into income quartiles, and used as a proxy for patient income status. The rate of surgical care was compared between groups using two-sample t-test and log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards modelling was used to determine covariate-adjusted impact of race on time to surgical care.

Results

The rate of surgical care was 6.8, 3.61 3.07, and 1.54 per 100 person-years for the RP-UI, RT-UI, RP-ED, and RT-ED cohorts, respectively. Cox proportional ‘time-to-surgical care’ regression analysis revealed that Black men were statistically more likely to receive ED surgical care (RP-ED AHR:1.79, 95% CI:1.49–2.17; RT-ED AHR:1.50, 95% CI:1.11–2.01), but less likely to receive UI surgical care (RP-UI AHR:0.80, 95% CI:0.67–0.96) than White men, in all cohorts except RT-UI. Surgical care was highest among Q1 (lowest income quartile) patients in all cohorts except RT-UI.

Conclusions

Surgical care for post-PCa treatment complications is low, and significantly impacted by racial and socioeconomic (income) differences. Prospective studies investigating the basis of these results would be insightful.

Abstract Image

前列腺癌治疗后并发症手术护理中的种族和社会经济差异:基于医疗保险的全国性分析
利用医疗保险标准分析档案(SAF),对 2015 年至 2021 年期间诊断为前列腺癌(PCa)的患者数据进行了一项回顾性队列研究。接受 RP 和/或 RT 术后出现 UI 和/或 ED 的患者被分为四个队列:RP-ED、RP-UI、RT-ED 和 RT-UI。将县级家庭收入中位数与 SAF 县级代码进行交叉比对,划分为收入四分位数,并将其作为患者收入状况的替代指标。使用双样本 t 检验和对数秩检验比较各组之间的手术治疗率。RP-UI、RT-UI、RP-ED 和 RT-ED 组群的手术治疗率分别为每 100 人年 6.8 例、3.61 例、3.07 例和 1.54 例。Cox比例 "手术治疗时间 "回归分析表明,在除RT-UI以外的所有队列中,黑人男性接受ED手术治疗的可能性高于白人男性(RP-ED AHR:1.79,95% CI:1.49-2.17;RT-ED AHR:1.50,95% CI:1.11-2.01),但接受UI手术治疗的可能性低于白人男性(RP-UI AHR:0.80,95% CI:0.67-0.96)。在除 RT-UI 以外的所有队列中,Q1(最低收入四分位数)患者的手术治疗率最高。对这些结果的基础进行前瞻性研究将很有启发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信