Minimizing the Pain of Local Anesthesia Administration in Interventional Radiology with an Anesthetic Portal Technique

Dylan Suttle, Virpal Gill, D. Sheeran, N. Keefe, Claire Davis, James Patrie, J. Angle
{"title":"Minimizing the Pain of Local Anesthesia Administration in Interventional Radiology with an Anesthetic Portal Technique","authors":"Dylan Suttle, Virpal Gill, D. Sheeran, N. Keefe, Claire Davis, James Patrie, J. Angle","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1781452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Objective This article assesses the effectiveness of a standardized local anesthetic (LA) technique designed to minimize the pain of local anesthesia administration in interventional radiology (IR).\n Materials and Methods A prospective study compared participants' experience in a control group (n = 63) of random LA administration techniques to a separate experimental group (n = 60) with a standardized technique based on known methods to minimize the pain of LA. Participants in each group were surveyed after LA administration to assess perceived pain and number of times a painful stick was felt. Participants were also asked to compare LA pain to prior experiences with LA, and to compare the overall pain experienced during the procedure to expected pain.\n Statistical Analysis Ordinal variable distribution analyses were performed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Categorical variable analyses were performed with the Pearson's global exact chi-square test.\n Results Pain of LA (mean 1.1 vs. 3.3 on a 0–10 scale, p < 0.001), number of times a painful stick was felt (mean 0.8 vs. 1.9 times, p < 0.001), and overall pain during the procedure (mean 1.5 vs. 3.4 on 0–10 scale, p < 0.001) were significantly less using the standardized versus random techniques. Compared with prior experiences of LA, pain using the standardized technique was less in 77.6%, the same in 22.4%, and more in 0% of patients while pain using the random technique was less in 46.4%, the same in 39.3%, and more in 14.3% of patients (p < 0.05).\n Conclusion Severity and frequency of pain from LA administration in IR procedures is minimized using a standardized anesthetic portal technique. This technique may also decrease overall pain experienced during IR procedures as well.","PeriodicalId":32940,"journal":{"name":"The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1781452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective This article assesses the effectiveness of a standardized local anesthetic (LA) technique designed to minimize the pain of local anesthesia administration in interventional radiology (IR). Materials and Methods A prospective study compared participants' experience in a control group (n = 63) of random LA administration techniques to a separate experimental group (n = 60) with a standardized technique based on known methods to minimize the pain of LA. Participants in each group were surveyed after LA administration to assess perceived pain and number of times a painful stick was felt. Participants were also asked to compare LA pain to prior experiences with LA, and to compare the overall pain experienced during the procedure to expected pain. Statistical Analysis Ordinal variable distribution analyses were performed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Categorical variable analyses were performed with the Pearson's global exact chi-square test. Results Pain of LA (mean 1.1 vs. 3.3 on a 0–10 scale, p < 0.001), number of times a painful stick was felt (mean 0.8 vs. 1.9 times, p < 0.001), and overall pain during the procedure (mean 1.5 vs. 3.4 on 0–10 scale, p < 0.001) were significantly less using the standardized versus random techniques. Compared with prior experiences of LA, pain using the standardized technique was less in 77.6%, the same in 22.4%, and more in 0% of patients while pain using the random technique was less in 46.4%, the same in 39.3%, and more in 14.3% of patients (p < 0.05). Conclusion Severity and frequency of pain from LA administration in IR procedures is minimized using a standardized anesthetic portal technique. This technique may also decrease overall pain experienced during IR procedures as well.
利用麻醉门户技术将介入放射学局部麻醉的疼痛降至最低
本文评估了旨在最大程度减轻介入放射学(IR)局麻给药疼痛的标准化局麻(LA)技术的有效性。材料和方法 一项前瞻性研究比较了随机使用 LA 给药技术的对照组(n = 63)和使用基于已知方法的标准化技术的实验组(n = 60)的参与者的经验,以最大限度地减少 LA 的疼痛。每组的参与者都在 LA 施用后接受了调查,以评估感知到的疼痛和感觉到痛棒的次数。参与者还被要求将 LA 疼痛与之前的 LA 经验进行比较,并将手术过程中的总体疼痛与预期疼痛进行比较。统计分析 采用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验对正态变量分布进行分析。分类变量分析采用 Pearson 全局精确卡方检验。结果 使用标准化技术与随机技术相比,LA 疼痛(0-10 级平均为 1.1 对 3.3,P < 0.001)、感觉到疼痛棒的次数(平均为 0.8 对 1.9 次,P < 0.001)和手术过程中的总体疼痛(0-10 级平均为 1.5 对 3.4,P < 0.001)明显减少。与之前使用 LA 的经历相比,77.6% 的患者使用标准化技术时疼痛较轻,22.4% 的患者疼痛程度相同,0% 的患者疼痛较重;而使用随机技术时,46.4% 的患者疼痛较轻,39.3% 的患者疼痛程度相同,14.3% 的患者疼痛较重(P < 0.05)。结论 使用标准化的麻醉门技术可最大程度地减少红外手术中使用 LA 时的疼痛程度和频率。该技术还可减少红外手术中的总体疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信