Description of the Ability to Arrange Assessments According Curriculum 2013 on Chemistry PPG SM3T Student

Sri Rahayu, H. Hairida, Rahmat Rasmawan, Rody Putra Sartika, Lukman Hadi
{"title":"Description of the Ability to Arrange Assessments According Curriculum 2013 on Chemistry PPG SM3T Student","authors":"Sri Rahayu, H. Hairida, Rahmat Rasmawan, Rody Putra Sartika, Lukman Hadi","doi":"10.33394/hjkk.v12i1.10442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The curriculum 2013 experienced a shift in the assessment process, which is from the assessment of results to the assessment process. In the process of carrying out the assessment, many complaints that arise in the field including the difficulty in determining the assessment of various aspects both cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. Researchers are interested in knowing how the ability of PPG SM3T Chemistry Education’s Students as a prospective professional teacher in compiling an assessment based on curriculum 2013. The research purposes were to describe the ability of PPG SM3T Chemistry Education’s Students in compiling an assessment based on curriculum 2013. The methode of the research was descriptive with study case involved 16 students of PPG SM3T Chemistry Education in the 2018/2019 school year. The research instrument was in the form of an assessment rubric with 10 aspects of assessment, one of which contained HOTS questions. The results of the data analysis showed that the ability of PPG SM3T Chemistry Education in compiling HOTS questions was classified as less skilled with an average score 67.19% whereas when viewed from all aspects of the preparation of the assessment based on curriculum 2013 it was classified as skilled with an average score 84.89%.","PeriodicalId":346446,"journal":{"name":"Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia","volume":"38 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v12i1.10442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The curriculum 2013 experienced a shift in the assessment process, which is from the assessment of results to the assessment process. In the process of carrying out the assessment, many complaints that arise in the field including the difficulty in determining the assessment of various aspects both cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. Researchers are interested in knowing how the ability of PPG SM3T Chemistry Education’s Students as a prospective professional teacher in compiling an assessment based on curriculum 2013. The research purposes were to describe the ability of PPG SM3T Chemistry Education’s Students in compiling an assessment based on curriculum 2013. The methode of the research was descriptive with study case involved 16 students of PPG SM3T Chemistry Education in the 2018/2019 school year. The research instrument was in the form of an assessment rubric with 10 aspects of assessment, one of which contained HOTS questions. The results of the data analysis showed that the ability of PPG SM3T Chemistry Education in compiling HOTS questions was classified as less skilled with an average score 67.19% whereas when viewed from all aspects of the preparation of the assessment based on curriculum 2013 it was classified as skilled with an average score 84.89%.
根据 2013 年化学 PPG SM3T 学生课程安排评估的能力描述
2013 年的课程设置经历了评估过程的转变,即从结果评估转变为过程评估。在进行评估的过程中,该领域出现了许多抱怨,包括难以确定认知、情感和心理运动等各方面的评估。研究人员有兴趣了解作为准专业教师的 PPG SM3T 化学教育专业学生在根据 2013 年课程编制评估时的能力。研究目的是描述 PPG SM3T 化学教育专业学生根据 2013 年课程编制评估的能力。研究方法为描述性研究,研究案例涉及2018/2019学年PPG SM3T化学教育专业的16名学生。研究工具采用评价量表的形式,包含10个方面的评价,其中一个方面包含HOTS问题。数据分析结果显示,PPG SM3T化学教育编制HOTS问题的能力被归类为不太熟练,平均得分为67.19%;而从基于2013年课程编制评价的各个方面来看,则被归类为熟练,平均得分为84.89%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信