Dies ist kein Liebeslied

M. Dahm
{"title":"Dies ist kein Liebeslied","authors":"M. Dahm","doi":"10.1515/bgsl-2024-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper examines the ›Eneasroman‹ of Heinrich von Veldeke within the context of its co-transmission. The different composite manuscripts, combining the ›Eneasroman‹ with various co-texts, raise the question of what conclusions can be drawn from them about the understanding and reception of the novel. It becomes obvious that the surviving compilations, all of them from the late Middle Ages, do not aim at highlighting the elaborate semantics of love. Instead, various historiographical and epistemological connections between the ›Eneasroman‹ and its accompanying texts are established, which emphasize the historical dimensions of the novel and the salvational significance of Eneas as the progenitor of the Romans.","PeriodicalId":512252,"journal":{"name":"Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur","volume":"19 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/bgsl-2024-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the ›Eneasroman‹ of Heinrich von Veldeke within the context of its co-transmission. The different composite manuscripts, combining the ›Eneasroman‹ with various co-texts, raise the question of what conclusions can be drawn from them about the understanding and reception of the novel. It becomes obvious that the surviving compilations, all of them from the late Middle Ages, do not aim at highlighting the elaborate semantics of love. Instead, various historiographical and epistemological connections between the ›Eneasroman‹ and its accompanying texts are established, which emphasize the historical dimensions of the novel and the salvational significance of Eneas as the progenitor of the Romans.
这不是一首情歌
本文在共同传播的背景下研究了海因里希-冯-维尔德克的《埃涅阿斯罗曼》。不同的综合手稿将 "Eneasroman "与不同的共同文本结合在一起,这就提出了一个问题:从这些手稿中可以得出哪些关于小说的理解和接受的结论。显而易见的是,现存的手稿汇编都是中世纪晚期的作品,其目的并不在于强调精心设计的爱情语义。相反,"埃涅阿斯长篇小说 "与其附带文本之间建立了各种历史学和认识论联系,这些联系强调了小说的历史维度以及埃涅阿斯作为罗马人始祖的救赎意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信