To trust or not to trust? Trust landscape of organic animal husbandry: Mapping consumer attitudes and information demands in Germany

E. Bayer, Sarah Kühl
{"title":"To trust or not to trust? Trust landscape of organic animal husbandry: Mapping consumer attitudes and information demands in Germany","authors":"E. Bayer, Sarah Kühl","doi":"10.1371/journal.pstr.0000102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A mainly positive attitude of consumers towards organic animal husbandry with its higher keeping standards compared to the legal regulations is evident. However, less is known about consumers’ detailed expectations of organic husbandry and in particular their attitude and trust along the value chain of organic animal products. Which consumers trust the most, and how do they want to be informed about organic animal husbandry? Where along the chain are trust deficits that should be addressed in the future to support sustainable food consumption with high animal welfare standards? To answer these important questions a survey was conducted among 729 German meat consumers. Using a cluster analysis, various consumer groups were identified based on their trust levels. Further, these groups were characterized regarding their general attitude, their information behavior, their evaluation of current media reporting, and their preferred way to be informed (emotional/rational) about organic animal products. The results revealed three clusters that clearly differ in their trust level of organic husbandry. Respondents assigned to the first cluster are committed organic consumers with high trust and the most positive attitude. The second cluster, combines respondents who are generally open to organic meat consumption and showing the second highest trust level and positive attitude towards organic. They show a slight favor for a more rational presentation of information. The third cluster is the smallest and can be described as the skeptics with a low interest in organic. The results indicate a general moderate to high trust level along the value chain of organic animal products, with the highest trust in organic retailers and farmers and the least trust in processing and conventional retailers. These are important insights for the organic sector in order to improve consumer trust and therewith increase the market share of organic meat products.","PeriodicalId":476828,"journal":{"name":"PLOS sustainability and transformation","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS sustainability and transformation","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pstr.0000102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A mainly positive attitude of consumers towards organic animal husbandry with its higher keeping standards compared to the legal regulations is evident. However, less is known about consumers’ detailed expectations of organic husbandry and in particular their attitude and trust along the value chain of organic animal products. Which consumers trust the most, and how do they want to be informed about organic animal husbandry? Where along the chain are trust deficits that should be addressed in the future to support sustainable food consumption with high animal welfare standards? To answer these important questions a survey was conducted among 729 German meat consumers. Using a cluster analysis, various consumer groups were identified based on their trust levels. Further, these groups were characterized regarding their general attitude, their information behavior, their evaluation of current media reporting, and their preferred way to be informed (emotional/rational) about organic animal products. The results revealed three clusters that clearly differ in their trust level of organic husbandry. Respondents assigned to the first cluster are committed organic consumers with high trust and the most positive attitude. The second cluster, combines respondents who are generally open to organic meat consumption and showing the second highest trust level and positive attitude towards organic. They show a slight favor for a more rational presentation of information. The third cluster is the smallest and can be described as the skeptics with a low interest in organic. The results indicate a general moderate to high trust level along the value chain of organic animal products, with the highest trust in organic retailers and farmers and the least trust in processing and conventional retailers. These are important insights for the organic sector in order to improve consumer trust and therewith increase the market share of organic meat products.
信任还是不信任?有机畜牧业的信任景观:德国消费者的态度和信息需求图谱
与法律规定相比,有机畜牧业的饲养标准更高,因此消费者对有机畜牧业的态度显然主要是积极的。然而,人们对消费者对有机畜牧业的详细期望,特别是他们对有机动物产品价值链的态度和信任度了解较少。哪些消费者最信任有机畜牧业?为了支持可持续食品消费和高动物福利标准,在价值链的哪些环节存在信任缺失问题?为了回答这些重要问题,我们对 729 名德国肉类消费者进行了调查。通过聚类分析,根据消费者的信任度确定了不同的消费群体。此外,还对这些群体的总体态度、信息行为、对当前媒体报道的评价以及对有机动物产品的首选知情方式(感性/理性)进行了分析。调查结果显示,三个群体对有机畜牧业的信任程度明显不同。第一组受访者是坚定的有机消费者,信任度高,态度最积极。第二组是对有机肉类消费持总体开放态度的受访者,他们对有机肉类的信任度和积极态度均居第二位。他们略微倾向于更合理的信息介绍。第三组是最小的一组,可以说是对有机食品兴趣不大的怀疑论者。结果表明,有机动物产品价值链上的信任度普遍处于中等到高等之间,其中对有机零售商和农民的信任度最高,对加工和传统零售商的信任度最低。这对有机行业提高消费者信任度,从而增加有机肉类产品的市场份额具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书