Looping Nature

Florian Endres
{"title":"Looping Nature","authors":"Florian Endres","doi":"10.54195/technophany.14830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following paper attempts to articulate a distinctly materialist notion of ideology by way of re-visiting two texts that have been considered oddities, if not embarrassments, by the subsequent developments of their respective disciplines: Freud’s Project for a Scientific Psychology and Engels’ Dialectic of Nature. Both text are strikingly similar in their speculative engagement with the natural sciences and in their potential to inform a renewed engagement with the question of the relation between technology and life. What I want to propose here is that these texts can enrich our understand of a Marxist notion of ideology if read through recent philosophical thinking on new technological developments (Bernard Stiegler, Catherine Malabou) and the concept of recursivity (Yuk Hui). This approach will allow for a properly materialist footing of a critique of ideology — namely by performing a turn from a critique that is primarily concern with the question of how we can penetrate false appearances towards a materialist account of how (“false”) appearances, something like “real abstractions” (Alfred Sohn-Rethel), can emerge out of the “flat plane” of matter.","PeriodicalId":428251,"journal":{"name":"Technophany, A Journal for Philosophy and Technology","volume":"26 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technophany, A Journal for Philosophy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54195/technophany.14830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The following paper attempts to articulate a distinctly materialist notion of ideology by way of re-visiting two texts that have been considered oddities, if not embarrassments, by the subsequent developments of their respective disciplines: Freud’s Project for a Scientific Psychology and Engels’ Dialectic of Nature. Both text are strikingly similar in their speculative engagement with the natural sciences and in their potential to inform a renewed engagement with the question of the relation between technology and life. What I want to propose here is that these texts can enrich our understand of a Marxist notion of ideology if read through recent philosophical thinking on new technological developments (Bernard Stiegler, Catherine Malabou) and the concept of recursivity (Yuk Hui). This approach will allow for a properly materialist footing of a critique of ideology — namely by performing a turn from a critique that is primarily concern with the question of how we can penetrate false appearances towards a materialist account of how (“false”) appearances, something like “real abstractions” (Alfred Sohn-Rethel), can emerge out of the “flat plane” of matter.
循环自然
下面这篇文章试图通过重新审视两部被各自学科的后续发展视为奇特甚至尴尬的著作,来阐述一种独特的唯物主义意识形态概念:弗洛伊德的《科学心理学计划》和恩格斯的《自然辩证法》。这两本书在对自然科学的推测参与方面,以及在为重新探讨技术与生活的关系问题提供信息的潜力方面,都有着惊人的相似之处。我想在此提出的是,如果通过最近关于新技术发展(伯纳德-斯蒂格勒、凯瑟琳-马拉博)和递归性概念(许煜)的哲学思考来解读这些文本,就能丰富我们对马克思主义意识形态概念的理解。这种方法将为意识形态批判提供适当的唯物主义基础--即从主要关注我们如何穿透虚假表象的批判转向唯物主义的解释,即("虚假")表象,类似于 "真正的抽象"(阿尔弗雷德-索恩-雷特尔),如何从物质的 "平面 "中产生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信