Utilising existing data for a pilot social return on investment analysis of the family wellbeing empowerment program: A justification and framework

Q2 Social Sciences
Clare Nolan, Rosie Bridge, Grace Holland, M. Whiteside, L. Baird, Suzanne Andrews, Anita Lee Hong, K. Tsey
{"title":"Utilising existing data for a pilot social return on investment analysis of the family wellbeing empowerment program: A justification and framework","authors":"Clare Nolan, Rosie Bridge, Grace Holland, M. Whiteside, L. Baird, Suzanne Andrews, Anita Lee Hong, K. Tsey","doi":"10.1177/1035719x241236779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Demand is growing in the public, private, and philanthropic sector for economic and quantifiable outcome data to guide decisions regarding the allocation of resources. This paper explores the challenges and opportunities in economically evaluating an Aboriginal Social and Emotional Wellbeing intervention, emphasising the value of utilising existing data. Driven by local and national Indigenous research priorities, the study involved a pilot Social Return on Investment analysis of the Aboriginal Family Wellbeing empowerment program. Underpinned by a collaborative mixed-methods approach, designed to mitigate data limitations and bolster trustworthiness, the analysis was undertaken across four stages, including a literature review to identify impacts and create a theory of change; co-design of an impacts framework; a targeted literature review to inform impact quantification and attribution; and calculation of the Social Return on Investment results. Results indicate that for every US dollar of investment in delivering Family Wellbeing between 2001 and 2021 in the Yarrabah Aboriginal community, US$4.60 of benefits were produced for participants and the community. The return is expected to be higher if important community and cultural impacts of the program were included in the monetisation. Data limitations and implications for future mixed methods economic evaluation of social interventions are explored.","PeriodicalId":37231,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","volume":"27 28","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719x241236779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Demand is growing in the public, private, and philanthropic sector for economic and quantifiable outcome data to guide decisions regarding the allocation of resources. This paper explores the challenges and opportunities in economically evaluating an Aboriginal Social and Emotional Wellbeing intervention, emphasising the value of utilising existing data. Driven by local and national Indigenous research priorities, the study involved a pilot Social Return on Investment analysis of the Aboriginal Family Wellbeing empowerment program. Underpinned by a collaborative mixed-methods approach, designed to mitigate data limitations and bolster trustworthiness, the analysis was undertaken across four stages, including a literature review to identify impacts and create a theory of change; co-design of an impacts framework; a targeted literature review to inform impact quantification and attribution; and calculation of the Social Return on Investment results. Results indicate that for every US dollar of investment in delivering Family Wellbeing between 2001 and 2021 in the Yarrabah Aboriginal community, US$4.60 of benefits were produced for participants and the community. The return is expected to be higher if important community and cultural impacts of the program were included in the monetisation. Data limitations and implications for future mixed methods economic evaluation of social interventions are explored.
利用现有数据对家庭幸福赋权计划进行社会投资回报试点分析:理由和框架
公共、私营和慈善部门对经济和可量化成果数据的需求日益增长,以指导有关资源分配的决策。本文探讨了对原住民社会和情感福祉干预措施进行经济评估的挑战和机遇,强调了利用现有数据的价值。在地方和国家土著研究优先事项的推动下,该研究对土著家庭幸福赋权计划进行了社会投资回报分析试点。该分析以合作式混合方法为基础,旨在减少数据局限性并提高可信度,分为四个阶段进行,包括文献综述,以确定影响并创建变革理论;共同设计影响框架;有针对性的文献综述,为影响量化和归因提供信息;以及计算社会投资回报结果。结果表明,2001 年至 2021 年期间,在亚拉巴原住民社区,每投资 1 美元用于实施 "家庭幸福 "计划,就能为参与者和社区带来 4.60 美元的收益。如果将该计划对社区和文化的重要影响纳入货币化,预计收益会更高。本文探讨了数据局限性以及对未来社会干预混合方法经济评估的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evaluation Journal of Australasia
Evaluation Journal of Australasia Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信