Conceptualizing and Contextualizing Media Innovation and Change

Frank Harbers, S. Banjac, Scott A. Eldridge II
{"title":"Conceptualizing and Contextualizing Media Innovation and Change","authors":"Frank Harbers, S. Banjac, Scott A. Eldridge II","doi":"10.17645/mac.8152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An innovation and change discourse has become central in journalism studies scholarship concerned with highlighting solutions to the many challenges confronting media in the digital era. Although with good intentions, these debates have been predominantly technocentric in their imagination of media’s future, inadvertently directing its development towards a preoccupation with mastering digital technologies. On the one hand, media have strategically appropriated and exploited such technocentric discourse to position themselves within the field as leaders with considerable prestige and status. On the other hand, however, journalists and media professionals have approached technological innovation with caution, demonstrating innovation to be a gradual process with incremental changes that need to align with or reimagine practices that support journalism’s core ambitions and public service ideals. Drawing on the scholarly work of colleagues included in this thematic issue, in this editorial we conceptualize media innovation as a fuzzy and contested concept and call for an expanded research agenda that redirects our attention more firmly towards: exploring organisational and institutional innovation; considering the role of ancillary organisations, collaborative projects, and the various newly emerging innovative actors within and outside of the journalistic field; adopting bottom-up approaches to examine societal innovation and its public value and scrutinize questions around who benefits from change; and finally, paying more attention to the transnational as well as culture-specific contexts in which media innovations happens.","PeriodicalId":507746,"journal":{"name":"Media and Communication","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An innovation and change discourse has become central in journalism studies scholarship concerned with highlighting solutions to the many challenges confronting media in the digital era. Although with good intentions, these debates have been predominantly technocentric in their imagination of media’s future, inadvertently directing its development towards a preoccupation with mastering digital technologies. On the one hand, media have strategically appropriated and exploited such technocentric discourse to position themselves within the field as leaders with considerable prestige and status. On the other hand, however, journalists and media professionals have approached technological innovation with caution, demonstrating innovation to be a gradual process with incremental changes that need to align with or reimagine practices that support journalism’s core ambitions and public service ideals. Drawing on the scholarly work of colleagues included in this thematic issue, in this editorial we conceptualize media innovation as a fuzzy and contested concept and call for an expanded research agenda that redirects our attention more firmly towards: exploring organisational and institutional innovation; considering the role of ancillary organisations, collaborative projects, and the various newly emerging innovative actors within and outside of the journalistic field; adopting bottom-up approaches to examine societal innovation and its public value and scrutinize questions around who benefits from change; and finally, paying more attention to the transnational as well as culture-specific contexts in which media innovations happens.
媒体创新与变革的概念化和语境化
创新与变革的论述已成为新闻学研究的核心,其关注的是如何解决媒体在数字时代所面临的诸多挑战。尽管出发点是好的,但这些辩论在对媒体未来的想象中主要以技术为中心,无意中将媒体的发展引向了对数字技术的掌握。一方面,媒体策略性地挪用和利用了这种以技术为中心的论述,将自己定位为该领域具有相当威望和地位的领导者。然而,另一方面,新闻记者和媒体专业人士在对待技术创新时却十分谨慎,他们认为创新是一个循序渐进的过程,需要与支持新闻业核心抱负和公共服务理想的实践相一致或重新构想。在这篇社论中,我们借鉴了本期专题中同事们的学术成果,将媒体创新概念化为一个模糊且有争议的概念,并呼吁扩大研究议程,将我们的注意力更坚定地转向以下方面:探索组织和机构创新;考虑辅助组织、合作项目以及新闻领域内外各种新兴创新参与者的作用;采用自下而上的方法研究社会创新及其公共价值,并仔细研究谁能从变革中受益的问题;最后,更多地关注媒体创新发生的跨国和特定文化背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信