Guangjun Gong , Jingru Zhang , Ying Teng , Qingping Li , Mingjun Yang , Jia-nan Zheng , Bingbing Chen , Yongchen Song
{"title":"Laboratory-scale studies on the effect of promoters on CO2 capture and sequestration via hydrate method: A comprehensive review","authors":"Guangjun Gong , Jingru Zhang , Ying Teng , Qingping Li , Mingjun Yang , Jia-nan Zheng , Bingbing Chen , Yongchen Song","doi":"10.1016/j.enrev.2024.100086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>CO<sub>2</sub> capture and sequestration via the hydrate method has attracted much attention because of its high sequestration density and energy density. However, the influencing mechanism of the promoters on the formation of CO<sub>2</sub> hydrate was not yet clarified. Also, there was no comprehensive review of the effect of promoters on CO<sub>2</sub> hydrate formation from laboratory-scale studies. Therefore, this paper reviewed the effect of promoters on CO<sub>2</sub> capture and sequestration via the hydrate method from the laboratory research scale. Typical CO<sub>2</sub> hydrate formation processes were summarized in detail. And the characteristic parameters of CO<sub>2</sub> hydrate were analyzed. Then, the different types of promoters were carefully overviewed. In particular, the influencing mechanisms of promoters on CO<sub>2</sub> hydrates were highlighted and compared. Thermodynamic promoters mainly affected the conditions of hydrate formation, while kinetic promoters mainly acted at the gas-liquid contact interface. However, the promotional mechanism of CO<sub>2</sub> hydrate promoters was controversial and the solution formulation units were not consistent. In addition, the effects of different promoters on CO<sub>2</sub> capture, separation, and sequestration were also summarized. The existing studies ignored the CO<sub>2</sub> hydrate formation experiments under in-situ conditions in the presence of promoters. The influence of different promoters on the sequestration effect was critically evaluated through parameters such as phase equilibrium curves, induction time, gas consumption, and sequestration density. A uniform evaluation standard for CO<sub>2</sub> hydrate promoters was lacking. Finally, future development recommendations should focus on large-scale, low-energy, commercial, in-situ, environmentally friendly, and intelligent research directions. The review may provide some theoretical guidance for the commercial application of CO<sub>2</sub> hydrate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100471,"journal":{"name":"Energy Reviews","volume":"3 4","pages":"Article 100086"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772970224000191/pdfft?md5=65dba5540f9efa22bffffe214feb6432&pid=1-s2.0-S2772970224000191-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772970224000191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
CO2 capture and sequestration via the hydrate method has attracted much attention because of its high sequestration density and energy density. However, the influencing mechanism of the promoters on the formation of CO2 hydrate was not yet clarified. Also, there was no comprehensive review of the effect of promoters on CO2 hydrate formation from laboratory-scale studies. Therefore, this paper reviewed the effect of promoters on CO2 capture and sequestration via the hydrate method from the laboratory research scale. Typical CO2 hydrate formation processes were summarized in detail. And the characteristic parameters of CO2 hydrate were analyzed. Then, the different types of promoters were carefully overviewed. In particular, the influencing mechanisms of promoters on CO2 hydrates were highlighted and compared. Thermodynamic promoters mainly affected the conditions of hydrate formation, while kinetic promoters mainly acted at the gas-liquid contact interface. However, the promotional mechanism of CO2 hydrate promoters was controversial and the solution formulation units were not consistent. In addition, the effects of different promoters on CO2 capture, separation, and sequestration were also summarized. The existing studies ignored the CO2 hydrate formation experiments under in-situ conditions in the presence of promoters. The influence of different promoters on the sequestration effect was critically evaluated through parameters such as phase equilibrium curves, induction time, gas consumption, and sequestration density. A uniform evaluation standard for CO2 hydrate promoters was lacking. Finally, future development recommendations should focus on large-scale, low-energy, commercial, in-situ, environmentally friendly, and intelligent research directions. The review may provide some theoretical guidance for the commercial application of CO2 hydrate.
通过水合物方法捕获和封存二氧化碳因其封存密度和能量密度高而备受关注。然而,促进剂对 CO2 水合物形成的影响机制尚未明确。此外,也没有全面综述实验室规模研究中促进剂对 CO2 水合物形成的影响。因此,本文综述了促进剂对通过实验室研究规模的水合物方法捕获和封存二氧化碳的影响。详细总结了典型的 CO2 水合物形成过程。并分析了 CO2 水合物的特征参数。然后,仔细概述了不同类型的促进剂。特别强调并比较了促进剂对 CO2 水合物的影响机制。热力学促进剂主要影响水合物形成的条件,而动力学促进剂主要作用于气液接触界面。然而,二氧化碳水合物促进剂的促进机制存在争议,溶液配方单元也不一致。此外,还总结了不同促进剂对二氧化碳捕获、分离和封存的影响。现有研究忽略了在有促进剂存在的原位条件下的 CO2 水合物形成实验。通过相平衡曲线、诱导时间、气体消耗量和封存密度等参数,对不同促进剂对封存效果的影响进行了严格评估。二氧化碳水合物促进剂缺乏统一的评估标准。最后,未来的发展建议应侧重于大规模、低能耗、商业化、原位、环境友好和智能化的研究方向。本综述可为二氧化碳水合物的商业应用提供一些理论指导。