Allogeneic transplantation of bone marrow versus peripheral blood stem cells from HLA-identical sibling donors for hematological malignancies in 6064 adults from 2003 to 2020: different impacts on survival according to time period

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
{"title":"Allogeneic transplantation of bone marrow versus peripheral blood stem cells from HLA-identical sibling donors for hematological malignancies in 6064 adults from 2003 to 2020: different impacts on survival according to time period","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jcyt.2024.03.489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) have been widely used instead of bone marrow (BM) as the graft source for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Although early studies demonstrated no significant differences in survival between PBSC transplantation (PBSCT) and BM transplantation (BMT) from human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling donors to adults with hematological malignancies, recent results have been unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of this retrospective study was to compare overall survival (OS), relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), hematopoietic recovery and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) between PBSCT and BMT according to the time period of HCT (2003–2008, 2009–2014, or 2015–2020).</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>We retrospectively compared the outcomes after PBSCT versus BMT in 6064 adults with hematological malignancies using a Japanese registry database between 2003 and 2020.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The adjusted probability of OS was significantly higher in BMT recipients compared to PBSCT recipients during the early period of 2003–2008 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70–0.91; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and the middle period of 2009–2014 (adjusted HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70–0.91; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). However, during the late period of 2015–2020, the adjusted probability of OS was comparable between BMT and PBSCT recipients (adjusted HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.79–1.13; <em>P</em> = 0.564), which were mainly due to the reduction of NRM. There was no significant difference in the relapse rate between the groups, irrespective of the time period. Compared to BMT, PBSCT led to faster neutrophil and platelet recovery and the cumulative incidences of grades II–IV and grades III–IV acute and overall and extensive chronic GVHD were significantly higher in PBSCT recipients, irrespective of the time period.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>PBSCT and BMT had similar survival outcomes and relapse rates in adult patients with hematological malignancies during the late time period of 2015–2020 despite the hematopoietic recovery and acute and chronic GVHD being higher in PBSCT recipients in all time periods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50597,"journal":{"name":"Cytotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1465324924005693","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) have been widely used instead of bone marrow (BM) as the graft source for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Although early studies demonstrated no significant differences in survival between PBSC transplantation (PBSCT) and BM transplantation (BMT) from human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling donors to adults with hematological malignancies, recent results have been unclear.

Objective

The objective of this retrospective study was to compare overall survival (OS), relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), hematopoietic recovery and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) between PBSCT and BMT according to the time period of HCT (2003–2008, 2009–2014, or 2015–2020).

Study design

We retrospectively compared the outcomes after PBSCT versus BMT in 6064 adults with hematological malignancies using a Japanese registry database between 2003 and 2020.

Results

The adjusted probability of OS was significantly higher in BMT recipients compared to PBSCT recipients during the early period of 2003–2008 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70–0.91; P < 0.001) and the middle period of 2009–2014 (adjusted HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70–0.91; P < 0.001). However, during the late period of 2015–2020, the adjusted probability of OS was comparable between BMT and PBSCT recipients (adjusted HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.79–1.13; P = 0.564), which were mainly due to the reduction of NRM. There was no significant difference in the relapse rate between the groups, irrespective of the time period. Compared to BMT, PBSCT led to faster neutrophil and platelet recovery and the cumulative incidences of grades II–IV and grades III–IV acute and overall and extensive chronic GVHD were significantly higher in PBSCT recipients, irrespective of the time period.

Conclusions

PBSCT and BMT had similar survival outcomes and relapse rates in adult patients with hematological malignancies during the late time period of 2015–2020 despite the hematopoietic recovery and acute and chronic GVHD being higher in PBSCT recipients in all time periods.

2003年至2020年6064名成人血液恶性肿瘤异体骨髓移植与HLA相同的同胞供者外周血干细胞移植:日本不同时期对生存率的不同影响
背景动员外周血干细胞(PBSC)已被广泛用于替代骨髓(BM)作为异基因造血细胞移植(HCT)的移植物来源。虽然早期的研究表明,对于患有血液恶性肿瘤的成人患者,从人类白细胞抗原(HLA)相同的同胞供者处获得的造血干细胞移植(PBSCT)与骨髓移植(BMT)在存活率上没有明显差异,但近期的研究结果尚不明确。这项回顾性研究的目的是根据 HCT 的时间段(2003-2008 年、2009-2014 年或 2015-2020 年),比较 PBSCT 和 BMT 的总生存率(OS)、复发率、非复发死亡率(NRM)、造血功能恢复和移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)。研究设计我们利用日本登记数据库,回顾性比较了2003年至2020年间6064名成人血液恶性肿瘤患者接受PBSCT和BMT治疗后的疗效。结果在2003-2008年早期(调整后危险比[HR],0.79;95% 置信区间[CI],0.70-0.91;P < 0.001)和2009-2014年中期(调整后危险比,0.80;95% 置信区间[CI],0.70-0.91;P < 0.001),BMT受者的调整后OS概率明显高于PBSCT受者。然而,在2015-2020年晚期,BMT和PBSCT受者的调整后OS概率相当(调整后HR,0.94;95% CI,0.79-1.13;P = 0.564),这主要是由于NRM的减少。无论时间长短,两组的复发率均无明显差异。与 BMT 相比,PBSCT 使中性粒细胞和血小板恢复得更快,而且无论时间长短,PBSCT 受者的 II-IV 级、III-IV 级急性和总体及广泛慢性 GVHD 的累积发生率都明显更高。结论在2015-2020年晚期,尽管PBSCT受者的造血恢复和急慢性GVHD在所有时间段都较高,但PBSCT和BMT在成年血液恶性肿瘤患者中的生存结果和复发率相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cytotherapy
Cytotherapy 医学-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
4.40%
发文量
683
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: The journal brings readers the latest developments in the fast moving field of cellular therapy in man. This includes cell therapy for cancer, immune disorders, inherited diseases, tissue repair and regenerative medicine. The journal covers the science, translational development and treatment with variety of cell types including hematopoietic stem cells, immune cells (dendritic cells, NK, cells, T cells, antigen presenting cells) mesenchymal stromal cells, adipose cells, nerve, muscle, vascular and endothelial cells, and induced pluripotential stem cells. We also welcome manuscripts on subcellular derivatives such as exosomes. A specific focus is on translational research that brings cell therapy to the clinic. Cytotherapy publishes original papers, reviews, position papers editorials, commentaries and letters to the editor. We welcome "Protocols in Cytotherapy" bringing standard operating procedure for production specific cell types for clinical use within the reach of the readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信