Research on tradable green certificate contracts under the renewable portfolio standard

IF 1.9 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENERGY & FUELS
Lingzhi Ren, Yi Ning, Zhanghua Chen, Zhiying Li, Wang Hui, Xiaopeng Li
{"title":"Research on tradable green certificate contracts under the renewable portfolio standard","authors":"Lingzhi Ren, Yi Ning, Zhanghua Chen, Zhiying Li, Wang Hui, Xiaopeng Li","doi":"10.1063/5.0186836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The implementation of renewable portfolio standards inevitably affects the strategic behavior and performance of tradable green certificate (TGC) market participants and brings policy risks and market risks. Contract is considered an effective governance tool to avoid the risks of TGC trading and helps TGC market participants to make scientific decisions. The article built a TGC contract model while considering the uncertainty of TGC supply and demand and provided a scientific analysis for designing TGC contracts. Finally, a numerical example was given to verify the optimal solution of the TGC contract model. The main results of this study are as follows: (1) higher electricity retail price could contribute to increasing the optimal trading volume and price of the TGC contract; (2) an increase in the wholesale price of electricity could decrease the optimal trading price of the TGC contract, but its impact on the optimal trading volume depends on the quota ratio designed by the government; (3) the impact of unit fines on the TGC contract is completely different from that of a lower price limit, where a low unit penalty and a high lower price limit for the TGC trading system could improve the trading volume of the TGC contract while reducing its price; and (4) transaction costs inhibit the trading volume of TGC contracts, but the impact on the optimal price depends on the size of transaction costs shared by different market participants; the transaction costs should be equally borne between the different market participants in order to eliminate the impact of transaction costs on the trading price of the TGC contract.","PeriodicalId":16953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0186836","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The implementation of renewable portfolio standards inevitably affects the strategic behavior and performance of tradable green certificate (TGC) market participants and brings policy risks and market risks. Contract is considered an effective governance tool to avoid the risks of TGC trading and helps TGC market participants to make scientific decisions. The article built a TGC contract model while considering the uncertainty of TGC supply and demand and provided a scientific analysis for designing TGC contracts. Finally, a numerical example was given to verify the optimal solution of the TGC contract model. The main results of this study are as follows: (1) higher electricity retail price could contribute to increasing the optimal trading volume and price of the TGC contract; (2) an increase in the wholesale price of electricity could decrease the optimal trading price of the TGC contract, but its impact on the optimal trading volume depends on the quota ratio designed by the government; (3) the impact of unit fines on the TGC contract is completely different from that of a lower price limit, where a low unit penalty and a high lower price limit for the TGC trading system could improve the trading volume of the TGC contract while reducing its price; and (4) transaction costs inhibit the trading volume of TGC contracts, but the impact on the optimal price depends on the size of transaction costs shared by different market participants; the transaction costs should be equally borne between the different market participants in order to eliminate the impact of transaction costs on the trading price of the TGC contract.
关于可再生能源组合标准下可交易绿色证书合同的研究
可再生能源组合标准的实施不可避免地影响可交易绿色证书(TGC)市场参与者的战略行为和绩效,并带来政策风险和市场风险。合约被认为是规避可交易绿色证书交易风险的有效治理工具,有助于可交易绿色证书市场参与者做出科学决策。文章在考虑绿色证书供需不确定性的同时,建立了绿色证书合约模型,并对绿色证书合约的设计进行了科学分析。最后,给出了一个数值实例来验证 TGC 合约模型的最优解。本研究的主要结果如下:(1)提高电力零售价格有助于增加 TGC 合约的最优交易量和价格;(2)提高电力批发价格可以降低 TGC 合约的最优交易价格,但其对最优交易量的影响取决于政府设计的配额比例;(3)单位罚款与价格下限对 TGC 合约的影响完全不同,TGC 交易系统的低单位罚款和高价格下限可以提高 TGC 合约的交易量,同时降低其价格;(4) 交易成本會抑制 TGC 合約的交易量,但對最理想價格的影響則視乎 不同市場參與者所分擔的交易成本大小而定;不同市場參與者應平均 分擔交易成本,以消除交易成本對 TGC 合約交易價格的影響。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.00%
发文量
122
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy (JRSE) is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal covering all areas of renewable and sustainable energy relevant to the physical science and engineering communities. The interdisciplinary approach of the publication ensures that the editors draw from researchers worldwide in a diverse range of fields. Topics covered include: Renewable energy economics and policy Renewable energy resource assessment Solar energy: photovoltaics, solar thermal energy, solar energy for fuels Wind energy: wind farms, rotors and blades, on- and offshore wind conditions, aerodynamics, fluid dynamics Bioenergy: biofuels, biomass conversion, artificial photosynthesis Distributed energy generation: rooftop PV, distributed fuel cells, distributed wind, micro-hydrogen power generation Power distribution & systems modeling: power electronics and controls, smart grid Energy efficient buildings: smart windows, PV, wind, power management Energy conversion: flexoelectric, piezoelectric, thermoelectric, other technologies Energy storage: batteries, supercapacitors, hydrogen storage, other fuels Fuel cells: proton exchange membrane cells, solid oxide cells, hybrid fuel cells, other Marine and hydroelectric energy: dams, tides, waves, other Transportation: alternative vehicle technologies, plug-in technologies, other Geothermal energy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信