Antenatal care services in Benin and Tanzania 2021/2022: an equity analysis study

Walter Ochieng, Anna Munsey, Alen Kinyina, Melkior Assenga, Faustin Onikpo, Alexandre Binazon, Marie Adeyemi, Manzidatou Alao, Sijenunu Aron, Samwel L. Nhiga, Julie Niemczura, Julie Buekens, Chong Kitojo, Erik Reaves, Ahmed Saadani Husseini, Mary Drake, Katherine Wolf, S. Suhowatsky, Aurore Hounto, Ruth Lemwayi, Julie R Gutman
{"title":"Antenatal care services in Benin and Tanzania 2021/2022: an equity analysis study","authors":"Walter Ochieng, Anna Munsey, Alen Kinyina, Melkior Assenga, Faustin Onikpo, Alexandre Binazon, Marie Adeyemi, Manzidatou Alao, Sijenunu Aron, Samwel L. Nhiga, Julie Niemczura, Julie Buekens, Chong Kitojo, Erik Reaves, Ahmed Saadani Husseini, Mary Drake, Katherine Wolf, S. Suhowatsky, Aurore Hounto, Ruth Lemwayi, Julie R Gutman","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2023-000547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antenatal care (ANC) interventions improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. However, access to ANC may be inequitable due to sociocultural, monetary and time factors. Examining drivers of ANC disparities may identify those amenable to policy change.We conducted an ANC services equity analysis in selected public facilities in Geita, Tanzania, where most services are free to the end-user, and Atlantique, Benin, where every visit incurs user fees. Data on total ANC contacts, quality of care (QoC) indicators and wait times were collected from representative household surveys in the catchment of 40 clinics per country and were analysed by education and wealth. We used indices of inequality, concentration indices and Oaxaca-Blinder decompositions to determine the distribution, direction and magnitude of inequalities and their contributing factors. We assessed out-of-pocket expenses and the benefit incidence of government funding.ANC clients in both countries received less than the recommended minimum ANC contacts: 3.41 (95% CI 3.36 to 3.41) in Atlantique and 3.33 (95% CI 3.27 to 3.39) in Geita. Wealthier individuals had more ANC contacts than poorer ones at every education level in both countries; the wealthiest and most educated had two visits more than the poorest, least educated. In Atlantique, ANC attendees receive similar QoC regardless of socioeconomic status. In Geita, there are wide disparities in QoC received by education or wealth. In Atlantique, out-of-pocket expenses for the lowest wealth quintile are 2.7% of annual income compared with 0.8% for the highest, with user fees being the primary expense. In Geita, the values are 3.1% and 0.5%, respectively; transportation is the main expense.Inequalities in total ANC visits favouring wealthier, more educated individuals were apparent in both countries. In Atlantique, reduction of user-fees could improve ANC access. In Geita, training and equipping healthcare staff could improve QoC. Community health services could mitigate access barriers.","PeriodicalId":117861,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Public Health","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2023-000547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antenatal care (ANC) interventions improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. However, access to ANC may be inequitable due to sociocultural, monetary and time factors. Examining drivers of ANC disparities may identify those amenable to policy change.We conducted an ANC services equity analysis in selected public facilities in Geita, Tanzania, where most services are free to the end-user, and Atlantique, Benin, where every visit incurs user fees. Data on total ANC contacts, quality of care (QoC) indicators and wait times were collected from representative household surveys in the catchment of 40 clinics per country and were analysed by education and wealth. We used indices of inequality, concentration indices and Oaxaca-Blinder decompositions to determine the distribution, direction and magnitude of inequalities and their contributing factors. We assessed out-of-pocket expenses and the benefit incidence of government funding.ANC clients in both countries received less than the recommended minimum ANC contacts: 3.41 (95% CI 3.36 to 3.41) in Atlantique and 3.33 (95% CI 3.27 to 3.39) in Geita. Wealthier individuals had more ANC contacts than poorer ones at every education level in both countries; the wealthiest and most educated had two visits more than the poorest, least educated. In Atlantique, ANC attendees receive similar QoC regardless of socioeconomic status. In Geita, there are wide disparities in QoC received by education or wealth. In Atlantique, out-of-pocket expenses for the lowest wealth quintile are 2.7% of annual income compared with 0.8% for the highest, with user fees being the primary expense. In Geita, the values are 3.1% and 0.5%, respectively; transportation is the main expense.Inequalities in total ANC visits favouring wealthier, more educated individuals were apparent in both countries. In Atlantique, reduction of user-fees could improve ANC access. In Geita, training and equipping healthcare staff could improve QoC. Community health services could mitigate access barriers.
2021/2022 年贝宁和坦桑尼亚的产前护理服务:公平分析研究
产前保健(ANC)干预措施可改善产妇和新生儿的预后。然而,由于社会文化、货币和时间等因素,获得产前护理的机会可能并不公平。我们在坦桑尼亚盖塔(Geita)和贝宁亚特兰蒂克(Atlantique)的部分公共设施中进行了产前保健服务公平性分析,前者的大部分服务对最终用户免费,而后者的每次就诊都需要付费。我们从每个国家 40 家诊所覆盖范围内具有代表性的家庭调查中收集了有关产前护理总接触次数、护理质量(QoC)指标和等待时间的数据,并按教育程度和财富状况进行了分析。我们使用不平等指数、集中指数和瓦哈卡-布林德分解法来确定不平等的分布、方向和程度及其诱因。我们评估了自付费用和政府资助的受益率:亚特兰蒂克省的产前护理接触次数为 3.41 次(95% CI 为 3.36 至 3.41 次),盖塔省为 3.33 次(95% CI 为 3.27 至 3.39 次)。在这两个国家中,无论受教育程度如何,较富裕的人都比较贫穷的人有更多的产前保健接触;最富裕、受教育程度最高的人比最贫穷、受教育程度最低的人多做两次产前保健。在大西洋省,无论社会经济地位如何,接受产前保健服务的人都能获得相似的 QoC。在盖塔,受教育程度或财富水平不同的人获得的优质保健服务差别很大。在大西洋省,财富最低的五分之一人口的自付费用占年收入的 2.7%,而财富最高的五分之一人口的自付费用占年收入的 0.8%,其中使用费是主要支出。在盖塔,这一数值分别为 3.1%和 0.5%;交通费是主要支出。在这两个国家,产前保健总就诊次数的不平等现象非常明显,更富裕、受教育程度更高的人更受青睐。在大西洋省,降低使用费可以改善产前保健的普及率。在盖塔,对医护人员进行培训并为其配备设备可以提高服务质量。社区卫生服务可以减少获得服务的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信