Empowerment in chronic wound care—exploring the scope for patient contribution†

Benedikt Hackert, Ewa Klara Stürmer, Ulrich Weger
{"title":"Empowerment in chronic wound care—exploring the scope for patient contribution†","authors":"Benedikt Hackert, Ewa Klara Stürmer, Ulrich Weger","doi":"10.2478/fon-2024-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n In this study, we investigated the concept of empowerment in chronic wound care and propose to facilitate patient control by making use of degrees of freedom (DOF): that is, shaping of everyday wound care tasks initiated by patients and based on their wishes, mostly in terms of patients executing treatment steps, requesting or directing health care professionals to undertake changes, or modifications of internal states.\n \n \n \n As a first step, we conducted a systematic literature search, followed by an inductive form of qualitative content analysis, which resulted in the identification of 5 dimensions as main elements of empowerment: education and shared decision making, adherence to self-care behaviors, responsibility and control, general call for empowerment, and DOF. However, the latter are noticeably absent in the literature. To investigate patients’ freedom in shaping the wound care process, we conducted a second literature search.\n \n \n \n A number of possibilities for patients to influence the wound care process could be identified, but experimental or clinical evidence about their effects is missing, their variety is limited, and they are only inadequately described.\n \n \n \n However, DOF should be an indispensable aspect of genuine empowerment, since they allow patients to occupy the role of the agent in the treatment process and give rise to the subjective experience of feeling empowered. Thus, in the third part, we develop a research proposal on how to investigate and include DOF in the clinical practice of wound care. Finally, limitations about implementations are discussed (e.g., patients being reluctant to overcome their passive role, resulting in frustration for health care professionals).\n","PeriodicalId":510754,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Nursing","volume":"4 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/fon-2024-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the concept of empowerment in chronic wound care and propose to facilitate patient control by making use of degrees of freedom (DOF): that is, shaping of everyday wound care tasks initiated by patients and based on their wishes, mostly in terms of patients executing treatment steps, requesting or directing health care professionals to undertake changes, or modifications of internal states. As a first step, we conducted a systematic literature search, followed by an inductive form of qualitative content analysis, which resulted in the identification of 5 dimensions as main elements of empowerment: education and shared decision making, adherence to self-care behaviors, responsibility and control, general call for empowerment, and DOF. However, the latter are noticeably absent in the literature. To investigate patients’ freedom in shaping the wound care process, we conducted a second literature search. A number of possibilities for patients to influence the wound care process could be identified, but experimental or clinical evidence about their effects is missing, their variety is limited, and they are only inadequately described. However, DOF should be an indispensable aspect of genuine empowerment, since they allow patients to occupy the role of the agent in the treatment process and give rise to the subjective experience of feeling empowered. Thus, in the third part, we develop a research proposal on how to investigate and include DOF in the clinical practice of wound care. Finally, limitations about implementations are discussed (e.g., patients being reluctant to overcome their passive role, resulting in frustration for health care professionals).
增强慢性伤口护理的能力--探索患者贡献的范围†。
在本研究中,我们对慢性伤口护理中的赋权概念进行了调查,并建议通过利用自由度(DOF)来促进患者的控制:即由患者发起并根据其意愿对日常伤口护理任务进行调整,主要体现在患者执行治疗步骤、要求或指导医护人员进行改变或改变内部状态等方面。 首先,我们进行了系统的文献检索,然后进行了归纳式的定性内容分析,最终确定了赋权的 5 个主要因素:教育和共同决策、坚持自我护理行为、责任和控制、对赋权的普遍呼吁以及 DOF。然而,文献中明显缺少后者。为了调查患者在塑造伤口护理过程中的自由度,我们进行了第二次文献检索。 我们发现了患者影响伤口护理过程的多种可能性,但缺乏有关其效果的实验或临床证据,其种类有限,描述也不够充分。 然而,DOF 应该是真正赋权不可或缺的一个方面,因为它们允许患者在治疗过程中扮演代理人的角色,并产生赋权感的主观体验。因此,在第三部分中,我们就如何研究 DOF 并将其纳入伤口护理的临床实践提出了研究建议。最后,我们还讨论了实施的局限性(例如,患者不愿意克服自己的被动角色,导致医护人员感到沮丧)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信