Metformin Continuation Versus Holding Pre and Post Coronary Angiography with Normal Renal Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Mohammad Hamza, Yasar Sattar, Sadaf Fakhra, Neel Patel, Mubashar Karamat, Saman Razzaq, Aamir Saeed, Khaled M. Harmouch, Islam T. Elgendy, M. Mamas, Anand Prasad, Wael Al Jaroudi, Ramesh Daggubati, M. C. Alraies
{"title":"Metformin Continuation Versus Holding Pre and Post Coronary Angiography with Normal Renal Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Mohammad Hamza, Yasar Sattar, Sadaf Fakhra, Neel Patel, Mubashar Karamat, Saman Razzaq, Aamir Saeed, Khaled M. Harmouch, Islam T. Elgendy, M. Mamas, Anand Prasad, Wael Al Jaroudi, Ramesh Daggubati, M. C. Alraies","doi":"10.54299/tmed/blxr6776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background It is common practice to withhold metformin prior to cardiac catheterization due to fear of developing lactic acidosis in the setting of contrast-associated acute kidney injury (AKI). The evidence behind this recommendation is currently weak. Methods We collected 851 articles from PubMed and Embase, of which 3 met our inclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria were age > 18 years, baseline use of long-term metformin with continued or interrupted metformin use in patients during diagnostic or interventional cardiac catheterization. The outcomes studied were differences between post-catheterization and pre-catheterization serum creatinine (SCr) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). We excluded studies dealing with patients not on long-standing metformin and those in which contrast exposure was through contrast enhanced computerized tomography. We used Hedges’s g with inverse variance method to pool standard mean difference with a random effects model using meta-cont module in CRAN-R software with 95% confidence interval (CI) for statistical significance. Higgins I-squared (I²) statistic was used to evaluate heterogeneity. Results . Post-catheterization serum creatinine (Hedges’s g = -0.12 mg/dL; CI = -0.83 to +0.6, p = 0.75, I2 = 95%), post-catheterization GFR (Hedges’s g = +0.18 mL/min; CI = -0.76 to +1.11, p = 0.71, I2 = 97%) and post-catheterization lactate levels (Hedges’s g = +0.03 mg/dL; CI = -0.66 to +0.72, p = 0.75, I2 = 95%) failed to reach statistical significance. Conclusions There is no statistically significant difference in SCr or GFR between patients who held metformin prior to cardiac catheterization and those who continued taking the medication.","PeriodicalId":478282,"journal":{"name":"Transformative Medicine","volume":"44 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transformative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54299/tmed/blxr6776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background It is common practice to withhold metformin prior to cardiac catheterization due to fear of developing lactic acidosis in the setting of contrast-associated acute kidney injury (AKI). The evidence behind this recommendation is currently weak. Methods We collected 851 articles from PubMed and Embase, of which 3 met our inclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria were age > 18 years, baseline use of long-term metformin with continued or interrupted metformin use in patients during diagnostic or interventional cardiac catheterization. The outcomes studied were differences between post-catheterization and pre-catheterization serum creatinine (SCr) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). We excluded studies dealing with patients not on long-standing metformin and those in which contrast exposure was through contrast enhanced computerized tomography. We used Hedges’s g with inverse variance method to pool standard mean difference with a random effects model using meta-cont module in CRAN-R software with 95% confidence interval (CI) for statistical significance. Higgins I-squared (I²) statistic was used to evaluate heterogeneity. Results . Post-catheterization serum creatinine (Hedges’s g = -0.12 mg/dL; CI = -0.83 to +0.6, p = 0.75, I2 = 95%), post-catheterization GFR (Hedges’s g = +0.18 mL/min; CI = -0.76 to +1.11, p = 0.71, I2 = 97%) and post-catheterization lactate levels (Hedges’s g = +0.03 mg/dL; CI = -0.66 to +0.72, p = 0.75, I2 = 95%) failed to reach statistical significance. Conclusions There is no statistically significant difference in SCr or GFR between patients who held metformin prior to cardiac catheterization and those who continued taking the medication.
肾功能正常者在冠状动脉造影前后继续服用二甲双胍与暂停服用二甲双胍:系统性回顾和元分析
背景 由于担心在造影剂相关急性肾损伤(AKI)的情况下发生乳酸酸中毒,在心导管检查前暂停使用二甲双胍是一种常见的做法。目前,这一建议背后的证据尚不充分。方法 我们从 PubMed 和 Embase 中收集了 851 篇文章,其中 3 篇符合我们的纳入标准。纳入标准为年龄大于 18 岁,在诊断性或介入性心导管检查中长期使用二甲双胍,并持续或间断使用二甲双胍的患者。研究结果为导管术后与导管术前血清肌酐(SCr)和肾小球滤过率(GFR)之间的差异。我们排除了涉及未长期服用二甲双胍的患者的研究,以及通过造影剂增强计算机断层扫描进行造影剂暴露的研究。我们使用 CRAN-R 软件中的 meta-cont 模块中的 Hedges's g 逆方差法和随机效应模型汇集标准平均差,并用 95% 置信区间 (CI) 表示统计显著性。希金斯 I 平方(I²)统计量用于评估异质性。结果 .导管术后血清肌酐(Hedges's g = -0.12 mg/dL; CI = -0.83 to +0.6, p = 0.75, I2 = 95%)、导管术后 GFR(Hedges's g = +0.18 mL/min; CI = -0.76 to +1.11, p = 0.71, I2 = 97%) 和导管术后乳酸水平 (Hedges's g = +0.03 mg/dL; CI = -0.66 to +0.72, p = 0.75, I2 = 95%) 均未达到统计学意义。结论 在心导管检查前服用二甲双胍的患者与继续服药的患者在 SCr 或 GFR 方面没有统计学意义上的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书