Effect of Microneedle on Hair Regrowth in Patients with Androgenetic Alopecia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Chunyan Xu, Xingwu Duan, Qiang Yin, Keshuai Liu
{"title":"Effect of Microneedle on Hair Regrowth in Patients with Androgenetic Alopecia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials","authors":"Chunyan Xu, Xingwu Duan, Qiang Yin, Keshuai Liu","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1782181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Objective Our objective was to assess the effectiveness and safety of microneedle by comparing microneedle plus 5% topical minoxidil treatment and microneedle alone to 5% topical minoxidil.\n Methods We searched databases such as Embase, PubMed, Cochrane library, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals, Wanfang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure in relation to literature. The control group received 5% topical minoxidil solution, whereas the treatment group received either microneedle coupled with minoxidil or microneedle alone. The increase in hair count and hair diameter was the main evaluation criterion for assessing hair regrowth. Data were pooled with Stata 15 software.\n Results Eight studies with 472 participants were included. Compared with 5% topical minoxidil therapy, microneedle plus minoxidil treatment showed a significant increase in hair count (standard mean difference [SMD] :15.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.34, 19.31, p < 0.05), but no increase in hair diameter (SMD: −0.21, 95% CI: −2.94, 2.52, p = 0.879 > 0.05). The results of subgroup analysis suggested that microneedle plus minoxidil treatment showed a significant increase in hair count whether the depth of microneedle was less than 1 mm (SMD:1.16, 95% CI: 0.86, 1.42, p < 0.05) or more than 1 mm (SMD:0.52, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.82, p < 0.05). In terms of treatment period subgroup, microneedle combined with minoxidil therapy significantly increased hair count and hair diameter than single 5% topical minoxidil, whether in 12-week period (SMD: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.76, 1.39, p < 0.05) or 21 to 24 weeks period (SMD: 0.64: 95%, CI: 0.35, 0.92, p < 0.05).\n Conclusion According to this study, the effect of microneedle treatment alone on androgenetic alopecia (AGA) may be limited. However, microneedle plus 5% topical minoxidil treatment had better hair regrowth in hair count and can be considered as an additional therapy option for AGA. Combined with subgroup analysis results, 12-week period and less than 1 mm depth of microneedle penetration were recommended.","PeriodicalId":479577,"journal":{"name":"Chinese medicine and natural products","volume":"35 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese medicine and natural products","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1782181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Our objective was to assess the effectiveness and safety of microneedle by comparing microneedle plus 5% topical minoxidil treatment and microneedle alone to 5% topical minoxidil. Methods We searched databases such as Embase, PubMed, Cochrane library, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals, Wanfang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure in relation to literature. The control group received 5% topical minoxidil solution, whereas the treatment group received either microneedle coupled with minoxidil or microneedle alone. The increase in hair count and hair diameter was the main evaluation criterion for assessing hair regrowth. Data were pooled with Stata 15 software. Results Eight studies with 472 participants were included. Compared with 5% topical minoxidil therapy, microneedle plus minoxidil treatment showed a significant increase in hair count (standard mean difference [SMD] :15.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.34, 19.31, p < 0.05), but no increase in hair diameter (SMD: −0.21, 95% CI: −2.94, 2.52, p = 0.879 > 0.05). The results of subgroup analysis suggested that microneedle plus minoxidil treatment showed a significant increase in hair count whether the depth of microneedle was less than 1 mm (SMD:1.16, 95% CI: 0.86, 1.42, p < 0.05) or more than 1 mm (SMD:0.52, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.82, p < 0.05). In terms of treatment period subgroup, microneedle combined with minoxidil therapy significantly increased hair count and hair diameter than single 5% topical minoxidil, whether in 12-week period (SMD: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.76, 1.39, p < 0.05) or 21 to 24 weeks period (SMD: 0.64: 95%, CI: 0.35, 0.92, p < 0.05). Conclusion According to this study, the effect of microneedle treatment alone on androgenetic alopecia (AGA) may be limited. However, microneedle plus 5% topical minoxidil treatment had better hair regrowth in hair count and can be considered as an additional therapy option for AGA. Combined with subgroup analysis results, 12-week period and less than 1 mm depth of microneedle penetration were recommended.
微针对雄激素性脱发患者毛发再生的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析
目的 通过比较微针加 5%米诺地尔外用治疗和微针单独治疗与 5%米诺地尔外用治疗,评估微针的有效性和安全性。方法 我们检索了 Embase、PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、中国科技期刊 VIP 数据库、万方数据库和中国国家知识基础设施等数据库中的相关文献。对照组采用5%米诺地尔外用溶液,治疗组采用微针联合米诺地尔或单用微针。毛发数量和毛发直径的增加是评估毛发再生的主要标准。使用 Stata 15 软件对数据进行了汇总。结果 八项研究共纳入 472 名参与者。与 5%的局部米诺地尔疗法相比,微针加米诺地尔疗法能显著增加头发数量(标准平均差 [SMD] :15.82, 95% 置信区间 [CI]:12.34, 19.31, p 0.05).亚组分析结果表明,无论微针深度小于 1 毫米(SMD:1.16,95% 置信区间:0.86,1.42,P <0.05)还是大于 1 毫米(SMD:0.52,95% 置信区间:0.23,0.82,P <0.05),微针加米诺西地治疗均能显著增加毛发数量。从治疗周期分组来看,微针联合米诺地尔疗法比单一的5%米诺地尔外用疗法能显著增加毛发数量和毛发直径,无论是在12周(SMD:1.08,95% CI:0.76,1.39,P <0.05)还是在21至24周(SMD:0.64:95%,CI:0.35,0.92,P <0.05)。结论 根据这项研究,单独使用微针治疗雄激素性脱发(AGA)的效果可能有限。然而,微针加 5%米诺地尔外用治疗在毛发数量上有更好的毛发再生效果,可作为 AGA 的额外治疗选择。结合亚组分析结果,建议采用为期12周、微针穿透深度小于1毫米的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信