Sent Out of the Garden: Posthuman Stewardship in Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam Trilogy

Alphy Sebastian
{"title":"Sent Out of the Garden: Posthuman Stewardship in Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam Trilogy","authors":"Alphy Sebastian","doi":"10.3126/litstud.v37i1.63001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The theme of bequeathing the human agency upon the ecosystem to post-human embodiments in literature is triggered by the wilful neglect of environmental hazards on the part of humanity in favour of capitalist concerns. The grave ecological concerns haunting the contemporary world culminated in the replacement of human stewardship to genetically modified, Crakers, in the MaddAddam trilogy by Atwood. Replete with biblical imagery, the new gardeners in the novel, are expected to salvage the sterile wasteland left by human civilization and transform it into a thriving Eden once again. MaddAddam Trilogy features a “fictional catastrophe” (285) written by a deeply unsettled Atwood while she was witnessing the receding glaciers on a boat in the Arctic. Although critics such as Marlene Holm and Bouson accuse Atwood privileging of humanist values and human traits at the cost of mocking “the idea of a bioengineered posthuman future” (Bouson 149) at all levels of the trilogy, introducing a new subjectivity to the otherwise anthropocentric vision of society remains significant.  In this paper, my primary aim is to study the nature of posthuman embodiment conceptualized by Atwood as the better custodians of nature. Do posthuman hybrids signify a utopian fantasy of human improvement or a radical reconfiguration of human subjectivity?","PeriodicalId":517739,"journal":{"name":"Literary Studies","volume":"135 11‐12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/litstud.v37i1.63001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The theme of bequeathing the human agency upon the ecosystem to post-human embodiments in literature is triggered by the wilful neglect of environmental hazards on the part of humanity in favour of capitalist concerns. The grave ecological concerns haunting the contemporary world culminated in the replacement of human stewardship to genetically modified, Crakers, in the MaddAddam trilogy by Atwood. Replete with biblical imagery, the new gardeners in the novel, are expected to salvage the sterile wasteland left by human civilization and transform it into a thriving Eden once again. MaddAddam Trilogy features a “fictional catastrophe” (285) written by a deeply unsettled Atwood while she was witnessing the receding glaciers on a boat in the Arctic. Although critics such as Marlene Holm and Bouson accuse Atwood privileging of humanist values and human traits at the cost of mocking “the idea of a bioengineered posthuman future” (Bouson 149) at all levels of the trilogy, introducing a new subjectivity to the otherwise anthropocentric vision of society remains significant.  In this paper, my primary aim is to study the nature of posthuman embodiment conceptualized by Atwood as the better custodians of nature. Do posthuman hybrids signify a utopian fantasy of human improvement or a radical reconfiguration of human subjectivity?
被送出花园:玛格丽特-阿特伍德的 "疯人院三部曲 "中的后人类管理制度
文学作品中将人类对生态系统的作用赋予后人类体现的主题,是由人类为了资本主义利益而故意忽视环境危害所引发的。在阿特伍德的《疯人院》三部曲中,人类的管理权被转基因 "疯人院 "所取代,从而将困扰当代世界的严重生态问题推向高潮。小说中的新园丁充满了《圣经》意象,他们要拯救人类文明留下的无菌荒地,将其再次改造成繁荣的伊甸园。疯人院三部曲》的特点是 "虚构的灾难"(285),作者是深感不安的阿特伍德,当时她在北极的船上目睹了冰川消退的景象。尽管玛琳-霍尔姆(Marlene Holm)和布森(Bouson)等评论家指责阿特伍德在三部曲的各个层面都以嘲弄 "生物工程后人类未来的理念"(布森,149 页)为代价,将人文主义价值观和人类特质置于优先地位,但为原本以人类为中心的社会愿景引入新的主体性仍然意义重大。 在本文中,我的主要目的是研究被阿特伍德概念化为更好的自然守护者的后人类化身的本质。后人类混血儿是人类进步的乌托邦幻想,还是人类主体性的彻底重构?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信