Comparison of Vibration Assisted Single Point and Two-Point Incremental Forming of Sheet Metal

1, 2024 Pub Date : 2024-03-06 DOI:10.46632/jemm/10/1/1
{"title":"Comparison of Vibration Assisted Single Point and Two-Point Incremental Forming of Sheet Metal","authors":"","doi":"10.46632/jemm/10/1/1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vibration-assisted single-point incremental forming (VASPIF) and two-point incremental forming(TPIF) are two innovative techniques employed in sheet metal forming processes, each offering distinct advantages and limitations. VASPIF utilizes high-frequency oscillations applied to the forming tool to reduce friction and improve material flow, resulting in enhanced formability and surface finish. Conversely, TPIF\nemploys two independently controlled forming tools to deform the sheet metal incrementally, allowing for greater geometric complexity and improved accuracy compared to VASPIF. However, TPIF typically requires more complex tooling and setup, potentially increasing manufacturing costs and setup time. Both techniques have shown promise in improving the formability of sheet metal components while offering unique capabilities suited to specific manufacturing requirements. Vibration-assisted single-point incremental forming (VASPIF) and two-point incremental forming (TPIF) are two advanced methods used in sheet metal forming, each with its unique characteristics, advantages, and limitations. In this comprehensive comparison, we will delve into the fundamental principles, process parameters, applications, advantages, and challenges associated with both techniques. Starting with VASPIF, this innovative approach involves applying high-frequency oscillations to the forming tool during the incremental forming process. These vibrations serve to reduce friction between the tool and the work piece, facilitating material flow and enhancing formability. By effectively decreasing the\nfrictional forces, VASPIF enables the deformation of difficult-to-form materials and improves the surface finish of the formed parts.","PeriodicalId":517869,"journal":{"name":"1, 2024","volume":"8 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1, 2024","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46632/jemm/10/1/1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vibration-assisted single-point incremental forming (VASPIF) and two-point incremental forming(TPIF) are two innovative techniques employed in sheet metal forming processes, each offering distinct advantages and limitations. VASPIF utilizes high-frequency oscillations applied to the forming tool to reduce friction and improve material flow, resulting in enhanced formability and surface finish. Conversely, TPIF employs two independently controlled forming tools to deform the sheet metal incrementally, allowing for greater geometric complexity and improved accuracy compared to VASPIF. However, TPIF typically requires more complex tooling and setup, potentially increasing manufacturing costs and setup time. Both techniques have shown promise in improving the formability of sheet metal components while offering unique capabilities suited to specific manufacturing requirements. Vibration-assisted single-point incremental forming (VASPIF) and two-point incremental forming (TPIF) are two advanced methods used in sheet metal forming, each with its unique characteristics, advantages, and limitations. In this comprehensive comparison, we will delve into the fundamental principles, process parameters, applications, advantages, and challenges associated with both techniques. Starting with VASPIF, this innovative approach involves applying high-frequency oscillations to the forming tool during the incremental forming process. These vibrations serve to reduce friction between the tool and the work piece, facilitating material flow and enhancing formability. By effectively decreasing the frictional forces, VASPIF enables the deformation of difficult-to-form materials and improves the surface finish of the formed parts.
振动辅助金属薄板单点和两点增量成形的比较
振动辅助单点增量成形(VASPIF)和两点增量成形(TPIF)是金属板材成形工艺中采用的两种创新技术,各自具有不同的优势和局限性。VASPIF 利用施加在成形工具上的高频振动来减少摩擦和改善材料流动,从而提高成形性和表面光洁度。相反,TPIF 使用两个独立控制的成形工具对金属板进行渐进变形,与 VASPIF 相比,几何复杂度更高,精度也更高。然而,TPIF 通常需要更复杂的工具和设置,可能会增加制造成本和设置时间。这两种技术都有望提高金属板材部件的成型性,同时提供适合特定制造要求的独特功能。振动辅助单点增量成形(VASPIF)和两点增量成形(TPIF)是金属板材成形中使用的两种先进方法,每种方法都有其独特的特点、优势和局限性。在本综合比较中,我们将深入探讨这两种技术的基本原理、工艺参数、应用、优势和挑战。从 VASPIF 开始,这种创新方法涉及在增量成形过程中对成形工具施加高频振动。这些振动可减少工具与工件之间的摩擦力,促进材料流动并提高成形性。通过有效减少摩擦力,VASPIF 可以使难以成型的材料变形,并提高成型零件的表面光洁度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信