Determinants of Cesarean Section Decision in Indonesia: A Systematic Review

S. R. Devy, Diah Indriani, Budi Prasetyo, Hari Basuki Notobroto, Lutfi Agus Salim, Muhammad Ardian Cahya Laksana, Nafiatus Sintya Deviatin
{"title":"Determinants of Cesarean Section Decision in Indonesia: A Systematic Review","authors":"S. R. Devy, Diah Indriani, Budi Prasetyo, Hari Basuki Notobroto, Lutfi Agus Salim, Muhammad Ardian Cahya Laksana, Nafiatus Sintya Deviatin","doi":"10.20473/jpk.v12.i1.2024.129-138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cesarean section delivery should be chosen if there are certain medical indications. However, the trend of childbirth by cesarean section shows a high increase in Indonesia. Complications of childbirth after cesarean section are higher compared to normal childbirth, this condition can endanger the health and safety of the mother and baby. Aims: to determine the determinants of cesarean section decisions in Indonesia. Method: this study is a systematic review using PRISMA, a database search via Google Scholar, PubMed, and ScienceDirect, keywords are adjusted to the topic discussed. Results: 13 articles were reviewed that were relevant to the research topic. Determinants of cesarean section decisions are medical indication including age, parity, pregnancy complications (hypertension and pre-eclampsia), history of delivery (cesarean section history), and labor complications (premature rupture of membranes and fetal distress) and by choice (own request) including residence in urban areas and employment. Conclusion: Interventions such as education, counseling, and others using appropriate communication, information, and education media, cooperation, and collaboration with academics and nongovernment organizations are needed in carrying out interventions.","PeriodicalId":517528,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Promkes","volume":"31 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Promkes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/jpk.v12.i1.2024.129-138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cesarean section delivery should be chosen if there are certain medical indications. However, the trend of childbirth by cesarean section shows a high increase in Indonesia. Complications of childbirth after cesarean section are higher compared to normal childbirth, this condition can endanger the health and safety of the mother and baby. Aims: to determine the determinants of cesarean section decisions in Indonesia. Method: this study is a systematic review using PRISMA, a database search via Google Scholar, PubMed, and ScienceDirect, keywords are adjusted to the topic discussed. Results: 13 articles were reviewed that were relevant to the research topic. Determinants of cesarean section decisions are medical indication including age, parity, pregnancy complications (hypertension and pre-eclampsia), history of delivery (cesarean section history), and labor complications (premature rupture of membranes and fetal distress) and by choice (own request) including residence in urban areas and employment. Conclusion: Interventions such as education, counseling, and others using appropriate communication, information, and education media, cooperation, and collaboration with academics and nongovernment organizations are needed in carrying out interventions.
印度尼西亚剖腹产决定的决定因素:系统回顾
背景:如果有某些医学指征,应选择剖腹产。然而,在印度尼西亚,剖腹产的分娩率呈上升趋势。与正常分娩相比,剖腹产后的并发症更高,这种情况会危及母婴的健康和安全。目的:确定印度尼西亚剖宫产决定的决定因素。方法:本研究采用PRISMA进行系统性回顾,通过谷歌学术、PubMed和ScienceDirect进行数据库搜索,并根据讨论的主题调整关键词。结果对与研究主题相关的 13 篇文章进行了综述。决定剖宫产的因素包括医学指征,包括年龄、胎次、妊娠并发症(高血压和先兆子痫)、分娩史(剖宫产史)和分娩并发症(胎膜早破和胎儿窘迫),以及选择(自己要求),包括居住在城市地区和就业。结论在进行干预时,需要利用适当的通信、信息和教育媒体、合作以及与学术界和非政府组织的协作,开展教育、咨询等干预活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信