Systematic review with expert consensus on use of extracorporeal hemoadsorption in septic shock: An Indian perspective

Yatin Mehta, Abdul Samad Ansari, Amit Kumar Mandal, Dipanjan Chatterjee, Gauri Shankar Sharma, Prachee Sathe, Purvesh V Umraniya, R. Paul, Sachin Gupta, Vinod Singh, Yogendra Pal Singh
{"title":"Systematic review with expert consensus on use of extracorporeal hemoadsorption in septic shock: An Indian perspective","authors":"Yatin Mehta, Abdul Samad Ansari, Amit Kumar Mandal, Dipanjan Chatterjee, Gauri Shankar Sharma, Prachee Sathe, Purvesh V Umraniya, R. Paul, Sachin Gupta, Vinod Singh, Yogendra Pal Singh","doi":"10.5492/wjccm.v13.i1.89026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\n Septic shock is a severe form of sepsis characterised by deterioration in circulatory and cellular-metabolic parameters. Despite standard therapy, the outcomes are poor. Newer adjuvant therapy, such as CytoSorb® extracorporeal haemoadsorption device, has been investigated and shown promising outcome. However, there is a lack of some guidance to make clinical decisions on the use of CytoSorb® haemoadsorption as an adjuvant therapy in septic shock in Indian Setting. Therefore, this expert consensus was formulated.\n AIM\n To formulate/establish specific consensus statements on the use of CytoSorb® haemoadsorption treatment based on the best available evidence and contextualised to the Indian scenario.\n METHODS\n We performed a comprehensive literature on CytoSorb® haemoadsorption in sepsis, septic shock in PubMed selecting papers published between January 2011 and March 2023 2021 in English language. The statements for a consensus document were developed based on the summarised literature analysis and identification of knowledge gaps. Using a modified Delphi approach combining evidence appraisal and expert opinion, the following topics related to CytoSorb® in septic shock were addressed: need for adjuvant therapy, initiation timeline, need for Interleukin -6 levels, duration of therapy, change of adsorbers, safety, prerequisite condition, efficacy endpoints and management flowchart. Eleven expert members from critical care, emergency medicine, and the intensive care participated and voted on nine statements and one open-ended question.\n RESULTS\n Eleven expert members from critical care, emergency medicine, and the intensive care participated and voted on nine statements and one open-ended question. All 11 experts in the consensus group (100%) participated in the first, second and third round of voting. After three iterative voting rounds and adapting two statements, consensus was achieved on nine statements out of nine statements. The consensus expert panel also recognised the necessity to form an association or society that can keep a registry regarding the use of CytoSorb® for all indications in the open-ended question (Q10) focusing on “future recommendations for CytoSorb® therapy”.\n CONCLUSION\n This Indian perspective consensus statement supports and provides guidance on the use of CytoSorb® haemoadsorption as an adjuvant treatment in patients with septic shock to achieve optimal outcomes.","PeriodicalId":517888,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"10 3‐5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v13.i1.89026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Septic shock is a severe form of sepsis characterised by deterioration in circulatory and cellular-metabolic parameters. Despite standard therapy, the outcomes are poor. Newer adjuvant therapy, such as CytoSorb® extracorporeal haemoadsorption device, has been investigated and shown promising outcome. However, there is a lack of some guidance to make clinical decisions on the use of CytoSorb® haemoadsorption as an adjuvant therapy in septic shock in Indian Setting. Therefore, this expert consensus was formulated. AIM To formulate/establish specific consensus statements on the use of CytoSorb® haemoadsorption treatment based on the best available evidence and contextualised to the Indian scenario. METHODS We performed a comprehensive literature on CytoSorb® haemoadsorption in sepsis, septic shock in PubMed selecting papers published between January 2011 and March 2023 2021 in English language. The statements for a consensus document were developed based on the summarised literature analysis and identification of knowledge gaps. Using a modified Delphi approach combining evidence appraisal and expert opinion, the following topics related to CytoSorb® in septic shock were addressed: need for adjuvant therapy, initiation timeline, need for Interleukin -6 levels, duration of therapy, change of adsorbers, safety, prerequisite condition, efficacy endpoints and management flowchart. Eleven expert members from critical care, emergency medicine, and the intensive care participated and voted on nine statements and one open-ended question. RESULTS Eleven expert members from critical care, emergency medicine, and the intensive care participated and voted on nine statements and one open-ended question. All 11 experts in the consensus group (100%) participated in the first, second and third round of voting. After three iterative voting rounds and adapting two statements, consensus was achieved on nine statements out of nine statements. The consensus expert panel also recognised the necessity to form an association or society that can keep a registry regarding the use of CytoSorb® for all indications in the open-ended question (Q10) focusing on “future recommendations for CytoSorb® therapy”. CONCLUSION This Indian perspective consensus statement supports and provides guidance on the use of CytoSorb® haemoadsorption as an adjuvant treatment in patients with septic shock to achieve optimal outcomes.
关于在脓毒性休克中使用体外吸血的系统性综述和专家共识:印度的观点
背景脓毒性休克是一种严重的脓毒症,其特点是循环和细胞代谢参数恶化。尽管采用了标准疗法,但疗效不佳。新的辅助疗法,如 CytoSorb® 体外血液吸附装置,已得到研究并显示出良好的疗效。然而,在印度的情况下,使用 CytoSorb® 体外吸附作为脓毒性休克的辅助疗法缺乏临床决策指导。因此,制定了本专家共识。目的 根据现有的最佳证据并结合印度的具体情况,制定/确立关于使用 CytoSorb® 吸血疗法的具体共识声明。方法 我们在 PubMed 上对 CytoSorb® 吸血疗法在败血症和脓毒性休克中的应用进行了全面的文献检索,选择了 2011 年 1 月至 2023 年 3 月期间发表的英文论文。在总结文献分析和确定知识差距的基础上,制定了共识文件的声明。采用改良德尔菲法,结合证据评估和专家意见,讨论了以下与脓毒性休克中 CytoSorb® 相关的主题:辅助治疗的必要性、启动时间表、白细胞介素 -6 水平的必要性、治疗持续时间、吸附剂的更换、安全性、前提条件、疗效终点和管理流程图。来自重症监护、急诊医学和重症监护的 11 位专家参与了讨论,并就 9 项声明和 1 个开放式问题进行了投票。结果 来自重症监护、急诊医学和重症监护的 11 位专家就 9 项声明和 1 个开放式问题参与并进行了投票。共识小组的所有 11 位专家(100%)都参加了第一、第二和第三轮投票。经过三轮反复投票,并对两份陈述进行了调整,最终就九份陈述中的九份陈述达成了共识。共识专家小组还认识到,有必要成立一个协会或学会,对所有适应症中使用 CytoSorb® 的情况进行登记,开放式问题(问题 10)的重点是 "对 CytoSorb® 治疗的未来建议"。结论 这份印度观点共识声明支持并指导脓毒性休克患者使用 CytoSorb® 吸血疗法作为辅助治疗,以获得最佳疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信