What Makes Quantization for Large Language Model Hard? An Empirical Study from the Lens of Perturbation

ArXiv Pub Date : 2024-03-11 DOI:10.1609/aaai.v38i16.29765
Zhuocheng Gong, Jiahao Liu, Jingang Wang, Xunliang Cai, Dongyan Zhao, Rui Yan
{"title":"What Makes Quantization for Large Language Model Hard? An Empirical Study from the Lens of Perturbation","authors":"Zhuocheng Gong, Jiahao Liu, Jingang Wang, Xunliang Cai, Dongyan Zhao, Rui Yan","doi":"10.1609/aaai.v38i16.29765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantization has emerged as a promising technique for improving the memory and computational efficiency of large language models (LLMs). Though the trade-off between performance and efficiency is well-known, there is still much to be learned about the relationship between quantization and LLM performance. To shed light on this relationship, we propose a new perspective on quantization, viewing it as perturbations added to the weights and activations of LLMs. We call this approach ``the lens of perturbation\". Using this lens, we conduct experiments with various artificial perturbations to explore their impact on LLM performance. Our findings reveal several connections between the properties of perturbations and LLM performance, providing insights into the failure cases of uniform quantization and suggesting potential solutions to improve the robustness of LLM quantization.\nTo demonstrate the significance of our findings, we implement a simple non-uniform quantization approach based on our insights. Our experiments show that this approach achieves minimal performance degradation on both 4-bit weight quantization and 8-bit quantization for weights and activations. These results validate the correctness of our approach and highlight its potential to improve the efficiency of LLMs without sacrificing performance.","PeriodicalId":513202,"journal":{"name":"ArXiv","volume":"26 48","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ArXiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v38i16.29765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantization has emerged as a promising technique for improving the memory and computational efficiency of large language models (LLMs). Though the trade-off between performance and efficiency is well-known, there is still much to be learned about the relationship between quantization and LLM performance. To shed light on this relationship, we propose a new perspective on quantization, viewing it as perturbations added to the weights and activations of LLMs. We call this approach ``the lens of perturbation". Using this lens, we conduct experiments with various artificial perturbations to explore their impact on LLM performance. Our findings reveal several connections between the properties of perturbations and LLM performance, providing insights into the failure cases of uniform quantization and suggesting potential solutions to improve the robustness of LLM quantization. To demonstrate the significance of our findings, we implement a simple non-uniform quantization approach based on our insights. Our experiments show that this approach achieves minimal performance degradation on both 4-bit weight quantization and 8-bit quantization for weights and activations. These results validate the correctness of our approach and highlight its potential to improve the efficiency of LLMs without sacrificing performance.
是什么让大型语言模型的量化变得困难?从扰动的角度进行实证研究
量化技术已成为提高大型语言模型(LLM)内存和计算效率的一种有前途的技术。虽然性能与效率之间的权衡已众所周知,但量化与 LLM 性能之间的关系仍有许多问题需要了解。为了阐明这种关系,我们提出了量化的新视角,将其视为添加到 LLM 权重和激活中的扰动。我们称这种方法为 "扰动透镜"。利用这一视角,我们对各种人工扰动进行了实验,以探索它们对 LLM 性能的影响。我们的研究结果揭示了扰动特性与 LLM 性能之间的若干联系,提供了对均匀量化失败案例的见解,并提出了提高 LLM 量化鲁棒性的潜在解决方案。为了证明我们研究结果的重要性,我们根据我们的见解实施了一种简单的非均匀量化方法。我们的实验表明,这种方法在权重和激活度的 4 位权重量化和 8 位量化上都实现了最小的性能下降。这些结果验证了我们方法的正确性,并凸显了它在不牺牲性能的前提下提高 LLM 效率的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信