Challenging Foam Sand Cleanout Operation in Ultra-Low Reservoir Pressure Wells Resumes Production in a CBM Field

S. Craig, A. Gupta, B. Kumar
{"title":"Challenging Foam Sand Cleanout Operation in Ultra-Low Reservoir Pressure Wells Resumes Production in a CBM Field","authors":"S. Craig, A. Gupta, B. Kumar","doi":"10.2118/218311-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Raniganj coal bed methane (CBM) field in India has over three hundred wells producing gas since 2010. Over time due to extensive dewatering, reservoir pressures have dropped to sub-hydrostatic levels, with some wells having water levels as low as 500m below the surface (~0.3 psi/ft gradient). Due to continuous production, the sand influx is ubiquitous in these moderately deviated wells requiring efficient well cleanout methodologies to continue production from old wells which have been shut due to sand ingress into the wellbore. This paper illustrates a detailed case study of effective well cleanout using Foam Assisted Coiled Tubing Cleanout. This methodology helped established standard practices across the entire field for foam cleanouts in old shut-in wells, helping in resuming gas production and avoiding expensive infill well drilling.\n Conventional two-phase nitrified cleanouts are sub-optimal due to very low bottom hole pressure (BHP) which requires higher nitrogen (N2) pumping rates and still had insufficient annular velocities considering 1.75-in. diameter coiled tubing (CT). Also, this poses a greater risk of the CT becoming stuck in the event of sudden lost returns. Hence, to establish circulation, all the existing thief zones need to be plugged. Using conventional lost circulation materials like calcium carbonates was not feasible due to the uncertain and expensive post-job clean-up required to restore zone permeability. Hence foam was selected for temporary zone plugging which can restore zone permeability automatically once foam disintegrates as per its half-life. Various foam recipes were tested to achieve the desired foam life, as it was imperative that it exceeded job treatment time. Also, localized work instructions were developed as per coal seam behavior, initial frac treatment pressures, and the production history of the well. These work instructions were then later developed into a standard operating practice (SOP) after achieving successful well cleanouts in a few initial pilot wells.\n In these 5.5-in. monobore completion wells, effective zonal isolation was required to sustain the higher flow velocities required for cleanouts. This was ensured by several CT simulation iterations aiming for foam quality of at least 75%. In absence of downhole pressure data, BHP was calculated from frac bottom hole treating pressures and ISIP. Also, the volumes of the foaming agent were optimized, and benchmarks were set for when to stop pumping the foaming agent and start taking pre-calculated sand bites. Considering that significant amounts of sand were to be cleaned out, it was important to calculate bite size, simulate the solids transport and maximum additional pressure head created during cleanouts.\n This paper presents a detailed case study of conducting Foam Cleanouts using Coiled Tubing in CBM wells having ultra-low BOTTOM HOLEP and big completion size of 5.5-in. The paper also describes in-depth procedures, lessons learned, and CT simulations involved which resulted in safe, successful, and efficient well cleanout jobs in over 50 wells.","PeriodicalId":517791,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, March 20, 2024","volume":"2 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, March 20, 2024","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/218311-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Raniganj coal bed methane (CBM) field in India has over three hundred wells producing gas since 2010. Over time due to extensive dewatering, reservoir pressures have dropped to sub-hydrostatic levels, with some wells having water levels as low as 500m below the surface (~0.3 psi/ft gradient). Due to continuous production, the sand influx is ubiquitous in these moderately deviated wells requiring efficient well cleanout methodologies to continue production from old wells which have been shut due to sand ingress into the wellbore. This paper illustrates a detailed case study of effective well cleanout using Foam Assisted Coiled Tubing Cleanout. This methodology helped established standard practices across the entire field for foam cleanouts in old shut-in wells, helping in resuming gas production and avoiding expensive infill well drilling. Conventional two-phase nitrified cleanouts are sub-optimal due to very low bottom hole pressure (BHP) which requires higher nitrogen (N2) pumping rates and still had insufficient annular velocities considering 1.75-in. diameter coiled tubing (CT). Also, this poses a greater risk of the CT becoming stuck in the event of sudden lost returns. Hence, to establish circulation, all the existing thief zones need to be plugged. Using conventional lost circulation materials like calcium carbonates was not feasible due to the uncertain and expensive post-job clean-up required to restore zone permeability. Hence foam was selected for temporary zone plugging which can restore zone permeability automatically once foam disintegrates as per its half-life. Various foam recipes were tested to achieve the desired foam life, as it was imperative that it exceeded job treatment time. Also, localized work instructions were developed as per coal seam behavior, initial frac treatment pressures, and the production history of the well. These work instructions were then later developed into a standard operating practice (SOP) after achieving successful well cleanouts in a few initial pilot wells. In these 5.5-in. monobore completion wells, effective zonal isolation was required to sustain the higher flow velocities required for cleanouts. This was ensured by several CT simulation iterations aiming for foam quality of at least 75%. In absence of downhole pressure data, BHP was calculated from frac bottom hole treating pressures and ISIP. Also, the volumes of the foaming agent were optimized, and benchmarks were set for when to stop pumping the foaming agent and start taking pre-calculated sand bites. Considering that significant amounts of sand were to be cleaned out, it was important to calculate bite size, simulate the solids transport and maximum additional pressure head created during cleanouts. This paper presents a detailed case study of conducting Foam Cleanouts using Coiled Tubing in CBM wells having ultra-low BOTTOM HOLEP and big completion size of 5.5-in. The paper also describes in-depth procedures, lessons learned, and CT simulations involved which resulted in safe, successful, and efficient well cleanout jobs in over 50 wells.
在超低储层压力井中进行具有挑战性的泡沫砂清理作业,恢复煤层气田的生产
自 2010 年以来,印度 Raniganj 煤层气田有三百多口井在生产天然气。随着时间的推移,由于大量脱水,储层压力已降至亚静水压水平,有些井的水位低至地表以下 500 米(~0.3 psi/ft 坡度)。由于持续生产,这些中度偏离的油井无处不在地涌入砂子,这就需要采用高效的清井方法来继续生产因砂子进入井筒而关闭的老井。本文详细介绍了使用泡沫辅助盘管清理法进行有效清井的案例研究。这种方法有助于在整个油田建立旧停产井泡沫清井的标准做法,帮助恢复天然气生产,避免昂贵的填充井钻探。由于井底压力 (BHP) 很低,需要较高的氮气 (N2) 抽速,而且考虑到 1.75 英寸直径的盘管 (CT),环形速度仍然不足,因此传统的两相硝化清管方法并不理想。此外,在突然失去回流的情况下,CT 被卡住的风险更大。因此,要建立循环,就必须堵塞所有现有的盗采区。使用碳酸钙等传统的循环损失材料并不可行,因为要恢复区域渗透性,需要进行不确定且昂贵的作业后清理。因此,我们选择了泡沫作为临时区域堵塞材料,一旦泡沫按其半衰期分解,便可自动恢复区域渗透性。为达到理想的泡沫寿命,对各种泡沫配方进行了测试,因为泡沫寿命必须超过作业处理时间。此外,还根据煤层特性、初始压裂处理压力和油井生产历史制定了本地化作业指导书。在最初的几口试验井成功实现清井后,这些作业指导书随后被发展成为标准操作规范(SOP)。在这些 5.5 英寸单孔完井中,需要进行有效的分区隔离,以维持清井所需的较高流速。通过多次 CT 模拟迭代,确保泡沫质量至少达到 75%。在没有井下压力数据的情况下,BHP 根据压裂井底处理压力和 ISIP 计算得出。此外,还对发泡剂的用量进行了优化,并设定了何时停止泵送发泡剂、何时开始抽取预先计算的咬砂量的基准。考虑到需要清理大量泥沙,因此必须计算咬入量、模拟固体输送以及清理过程中产生的最大额外压头。本文详细介绍了在煤层气井中使用盘管进行泡沫清井的案例研究,这些井具有超低的井底孔径和 5.5 英寸的大完井尺寸。本文还介绍了相关的深入程序、经验教训和 CT 模拟,最终在 50 多口井中实现了安全、成功和高效的清井作业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信