Assuring Critical Coiled Tubing Re-Entry Operations of Old Wells with Integrity Issues by the Application of the Well Intervention Guide, Provides Execution to Safeguard the Life and Environment

A. Rodriguez, C. Cadavid, O. Ortega, P. Silva, L. Guarín, R. Rincón, M. Cuervo, R. Garay, J. Hernandez
{"title":"Assuring Critical Coiled Tubing Re-Entry Operations of Old Wells with Integrity Issues by the Application of the Well Intervention Guide, Provides Execution to Safeguard the Life and Environment","authors":"A. Rodriguez, C. Cadavid, O. Ortega, P. Silva, L. Guarín, R. Rincón, M. Cuervo, R. Garay, J. Hernandez","doi":"10.2118/218303-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents the critical aspects taken into account during the planning process of a Coiled Tubing re-entry of an old abandoned well with substandard modified wellhead, a section of 2-7/8″ tubing stuck into the surface cement plug, hazardous atmosphere readings, integrity issues exhibiting sustained casing pressure, wellbore fluids migration on surface, presence of formation faults connecting over pressured formations and background of a well control event requiring 21.1 ppg fluid during the completion stage.\n Due to the complexity of the Coiled Tubing intervention and information uncertainty, the planning strategy was divided in three stages: First, an initial inspection to determine the integrity status of the wellhead and accessories on the surface, then a second stage to ensure and correct the integrity of the wellhead and the last stage to carry out the intervention on coiled tubing. For the last stage the IDA-G-001 Well Intervention Guide process was followed to fulfil a strict operational discipline including several peer reviews by technical authorities to safeguard the life and environment.\n The well interventions team planned a critical Plug and Abandonment P&A intervention in a restricted access location; the need for more information was a challenge. The field group accomplished the challenge of milling out with Coiled tubing, the 7″ casing cement plug, and 2-7/8″ tubing with expected well pressure below the cement plug with the proper simulations, bases of design and risk assessments. Acquiring more information about the well's integrity by running electric logs was crucial for adequately designing the abandonment that fulfills the government regulations and industry standards. Consequence analysis and multidisciplinary detailed risk assessment were essential for identify contingency plans during the planning. The pre-operational QA Check list was verified for all the services involved in the abandonment, to mitigate the risk of equipment failure, and this contributed to execute the intervention according to the planing. The two first stages of wellhead inspection and subsequent integrity assurance allowed the intervention with no wellbore fluids that could contaminate the surface.\n The application of the corporate Guide for the Planning and Execution of Special Interventions, (Well Intervention Guide WIG), is a detailed process that, through an initial risk assessment, determines the complexity of the planning and safe execution of high-risk interventions and is a powerful tool when critical operations such as the intervention of old wells with lack of information and integrity are required.","PeriodicalId":517791,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, March 20, 2024","volume":"6 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, March 20, 2024","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/218303-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents the critical aspects taken into account during the planning process of a Coiled Tubing re-entry of an old abandoned well with substandard modified wellhead, a section of 2-7/8″ tubing stuck into the surface cement plug, hazardous atmosphere readings, integrity issues exhibiting sustained casing pressure, wellbore fluids migration on surface, presence of formation faults connecting over pressured formations and background of a well control event requiring 21.1 ppg fluid during the completion stage. Due to the complexity of the Coiled Tubing intervention and information uncertainty, the planning strategy was divided in three stages: First, an initial inspection to determine the integrity status of the wellhead and accessories on the surface, then a second stage to ensure and correct the integrity of the wellhead and the last stage to carry out the intervention on coiled tubing. For the last stage the IDA-G-001 Well Intervention Guide process was followed to fulfil a strict operational discipline including several peer reviews by technical authorities to safeguard the life and environment. The well interventions team planned a critical Plug and Abandonment P&A intervention in a restricted access location; the need for more information was a challenge. The field group accomplished the challenge of milling out with Coiled tubing, the 7″ casing cement plug, and 2-7/8″ tubing with expected well pressure below the cement plug with the proper simulations, bases of design and risk assessments. Acquiring more information about the well's integrity by running electric logs was crucial for adequately designing the abandonment that fulfills the government regulations and industry standards. Consequence analysis and multidisciplinary detailed risk assessment were essential for identify contingency plans during the planning. The pre-operational QA Check list was verified for all the services involved in the abandonment, to mitigate the risk of equipment failure, and this contributed to execute the intervention according to the planing. The two first stages of wellhead inspection and subsequent integrity assurance allowed the intervention with no wellbore fluids that could contaminate the surface. The application of the corporate Guide for the Planning and Execution of Special Interventions, (Well Intervention Guide WIG), is a detailed process that, through an initial risk assessment, determines the complexity of the planning and safe execution of high-risk interventions and is a powerful tool when critical operations such as the intervention of old wells with lack of information and integrity are required.
通过应用《油井干预指南》确保对存在完整性问题的老井进行关键性的盘管重返作业,为保护生命和环境提供执行力
本文介绍了在对一口废弃旧井进行盘管再入井计划过程中考虑到的关键问题,这口井的改造井口不达标,一段 2-7/8 英寸的油管卡在地面水泥塞中,读数显示为危险大气,完整性问题显示为持续套管压力,井筒流体在地面迁移,存在地层断层,连接过压地层,以及完井阶段需要 21.1 ppg 流体的井控事件背景。由于盘管干预的复杂性和信息的不确定性,规划战略分为三个阶段:首先是初步检查,以确定井口和地面附件的完整性状态,然后是第二阶段,以确保和纠正井口的完整性,最后是对盘管进行干预。最后一个阶段遵循《IDA-G-001 油井干预指南》流程,执行严格的操作纪律,包括由技术部门进行多次同行评审,以保护生命和环境。油井干预小组计划在一个限制进入的地点进行一次关键的堵塞和废弃 P&A 干预;需要更多的信息是一项挑战。现场小组通过适当的模拟、设计基础和风险评估,完成了用盘管、7 英寸套管水泥塞和 2-7/8 英寸油管铣出水泥塞下方预期井压的挑战。通过电子测井记录获取更多有关油井完整性的信息,对于充分设计符合政府规定和行业标准的废弃方案至关重要。后果分析和多学科详细风险评估对于在规划期间确定应急计划至关重要。为降低设备故障风险,对所有参与弃井的服务进行了作业前质量保证检查清单验证,这有助于按照计划实施干预。井口检查和随后的完整性保证这两个第一阶段的工作使得干预工作没有可能污染地面的井筒流体。公司《特殊干预规划和执行指南》(《油井干预指南》WIG)的应用是一个详细的过程,通过初步风险评估,确定高风险干预规划和安全执行的复杂性,在需要对缺乏信息和完整性的老井进行干预等关键操作时,它是一个强有力的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信