{"title":"Bloody Petticoats: Performative Monstrosity of the Female Slayer in Seth Grahame-Smith’s Pride and Prejudice and Zombies","authors":"Michelle L. Rushefsky","doi":"10.3390/h13020052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2009, Seth Grahame-Smith published Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, sparking a subgenre that situates itself within multiple genres. I draw from the rebellious nature of nineteenth-century proto-feminists who tried to reclaim the female monster as an initial methodology to analyze Grahame-Smith’s Elizabeth Bennet. I argue that the (white) women in this horror rewriting inadvertently become the oppressors alongside contextualized zombie theory. This article also explores Grahame-Smith’s Charlotte Lucas as a complex female monster, as she is bitten and turned into a zombie, which reflects in part Jane Austen’s Charlotte’s social status and (potential) spinsterdom. It is the mythos of the zombie that makes Grahame-Smith’s Elizabeth Bennet’s feminist subversion less remarkable. And it is Charlotte’s embodiment of both the rhetorical and the religio-mythic monster that merges two narratives: the Americanized appropriated zombie and the oppressed woman. Grahame-Smith’s characters try to embody the resistance of twenty-first feminist sensibilities but fail due to the racial undertones of the zombie tangentially present in Pride and Prejudice and Zombies.","PeriodicalId":509613,"journal":{"name":"Humanities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/h13020052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In 2009, Seth Grahame-Smith published Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, sparking a subgenre that situates itself within multiple genres. I draw from the rebellious nature of nineteenth-century proto-feminists who tried to reclaim the female monster as an initial methodology to analyze Grahame-Smith’s Elizabeth Bennet. I argue that the (white) women in this horror rewriting inadvertently become the oppressors alongside contextualized zombie theory. This article also explores Grahame-Smith’s Charlotte Lucas as a complex female monster, as she is bitten and turned into a zombie, which reflects in part Jane Austen’s Charlotte’s social status and (potential) spinsterdom. It is the mythos of the zombie that makes Grahame-Smith’s Elizabeth Bennet’s feminist subversion less remarkable. And it is Charlotte’s embodiment of both the rhetorical and the religio-mythic monster that merges two narratives: the Americanized appropriated zombie and the oppressed woman. Grahame-Smith’s characters try to embody the resistance of twenty-first feminist sensibilities but fail due to the racial undertones of the zombie tangentially present in Pride and Prejudice and Zombies.
2009 年,塞斯-格雷厄姆-史密斯(Seth Grahame-Smith)出版了《傲慢与偏见和僵尸》(Pride and Prejudice and Zombies)一书,引发了一种将自己置于多种流派之中的亚流派。我从十九世纪原女性主义者试图重塑女性怪物的反叛本质出发,作为分析格雷厄姆-史密斯笔下伊丽莎白-班纳特的初步方法。我认为,这种恐怖改写中的(白人)女性无意中成为了语境化僵尸理论的压迫者。本文还探讨了格雷厄姆-史密斯笔下的夏洛特-卢卡斯这一复杂的女性怪物,因为她被咬后变成了僵尸,这在一定程度上反映了简-奥斯汀笔下夏洛特的社会地位和(潜在的)老处女身份。正是 "僵尸 "的神话让格雷厄姆-史密斯笔下的伊丽莎白-班纳特对女性主义的颠覆不那么引人注目。正是夏洛特所体现的修辞和宗教神话中的怪物融合了两种叙事:美国化的僵尸和受压迫的女性。格拉哈梅-史密斯笔下的人物试图体现二十一世纪女权主义的反抗精神,但由于《傲慢与偏见与僵尸》中切切实实存在的僵尸种族色彩而失败。