Assessment of quality of life in patients after surgery for pancreatic and periampullary malignancies. Systematic review

I. E. Khatkov, R. Izrailov, P. Tyutyunnik, N. O. Solovyev
{"title":"Assessment of quality of life in patients after surgery for pancreatic and periampullary malignancies. Systematic review","authors":"I. E. Khatkov, R. Izrailov, P. Tyutyunnik, N. O. Solovyev","doi":"10.16931/1995-5464.2024-1-100-112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"   Aim. To analyze the current methods of life quality assessment in patients undergoing surgical treatment for pancreatic and periampullary cancer, to study the influence of surgical treatment and postoperative complications on the quality of life.   Materials and methods. The study involves a systematic review of the literature available in MEDLINE, Embase and e-Library electronic databases for 2015–2022. The methodology of the systematic review is reflected in the study protocol, designed according to PRISMA guidelines.   Results. The systematic review embraces 26 studies including 4937 patients met the inclusion criteria. The present study examines design and objectives, survey forms, methods of surgical interventions and drug treatment, survey frequency and data collection methodology, risk of systematic error, etc.   Conclusion. When choosing a survey form, most authors favored EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-PAN26. Even the most complex surgeries such as pancreaticoduodenal resection and pancreatectomy can provide a satisfactory quality of life. Many current studies appear methodologically-challenged thereby increasing the risk of systematic error and reducing the reliability of the data. The quality of life of patients in this category is to be further investigated, the optimal principles and methodology of such studies are to be standardized, in particular, in Russian healthcare system.","PeriodicalId":505469,"journal":{"name":"Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery","volume":" 38","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.2024-1-100-112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

   Aim. To analyze the current methods of life quality assessment in patients undergoing surgical treatment for pancreatic and periampullary cancer, to study the influence of surgical treatment and postoperative complications on the quality of life.   Materials and methods. The study involves a systematic review of the literature available in MEDLINE, Embase and e-Library electronic databases for 2015–2022. The methodology of the systematic review is reflected in the study protocol, designed according to PRISMA guidelines.   Results. The systematic review embraces 26 studies including 4937 patients met the inclusion criteria. The present study examines design and objectives, survey forms, methods of surgical interventions and drug treatment, survey frequency and data collection methodology, risk of systematic error, etc.   Conclusion. When choosing a survey form, most authors favored EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-PAN26. Even the most complex surgeries such as pancreaticoduodenal resection and pancreatectomy can provide a satisfactory quality of life. Many current studies appear methodologically-challenged thereby increasing the risk of systematic error and reducing the reliability of the data. The quality of life of patients in this category is to be further investigated, the optimal principles and methodology of such studies are to be standardized, in particular, in Russian healthcare system.
胰腺和胰腺周围恶性肿瘤术后患者的生活质量评估。系统回顾
目的分析目前对接受手术治疗的胰腺癌和胰周肿瘤患者进行生活质量评估的方法,研究手术治疗和术后并发症对生活质量的影响。 材料和方法。本研究对 MEDLINE、Embase 和 e-Library 电子数据库中 2015-2022 年的文献进行了系统回顾。系统性综述的方法反映在根据 PRISMA 指南设计的研究方案中。 研究结果符合纳入标准的系统性综述包括 26 项研究,涉及 4937 名患者。本研究审查了设计和目标、调查形式、手术干预和药物治疗方法、调查频率和数据收集方法、系统误差风险等。 研究结论在选择调查表时,大多数作者倾向于 EORTC QLQ-C30 和 EORTC QLQ-PAN26。即使是最复杂的手术,如胰十二指肠切除术和胰腺切除术,也能提供令人满意的生活质量。目前的许多研究在方法上存在挑战,从而增加了系统误差的风险,降低了数据的可靠性。此类患者的生活质量有待进一步调查,此类研究的最佳原则和方法也有待标准化,特别是在俄罗斯医疗系统中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信