Methods for economic assessment of forest resource degradation: A systematic review

Robert Sourokou, F. Vodouhè, Jacob A. Yabi
{"title":"Methods for economic assessment of forest resource degradation: A systematic review","authors":"Robert Sourokou, F. Vodouhè, Jacob A. Yabi","doi":"10.24294/nrcr.v7i1.4353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forest degradation is one of the challenges facing the planet today. Several methods have been used to measure forest degradation, including spatiotemporal model analysis, satellite analysis, remote sensing, time series data, geospatial techniques, and most recently aerial drone imagery. However, few studies have used economic valuation methods to assess forest degradation. Therefore, this research aimed to identify the methods used the economic assessment of forest degradation. This systematic review was carried out using PRISMA guidelines. Research articles on the economic valuation of forest resource loss, published from 2015 to 2022, were electronically collected from three databases. Three independent reviewers, with the third acting as referee, inventoried articles, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in the articles included in the study. A total of 10,095 articles were identified, including one article from the grey literature. Only five articles met the eligibility criteria. A qualitative content analysis was performed on the extracted data. The selected articles used various methods. However, only a few articles used the contingent valuation method, even though this is indicated for estimating the highest economic value of forests. Based on forest functions, the articles evaluated erosion due to the absence of trees, wood loss, recreation areas and externalities due to forest loss, air quality, water regulation, food supply, and wildlife. The main limitation of this review was the small number of studies included, which may have affected the findings. The study protocol is registered in PROSPERO under the number CRD42021223242","PeriodicalId":113263,"journal":{"name":"Natural Resources Conservation and Research","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Resources Conservation and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24294/nrcr.v7i1.4353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forest degradation is one of the challenges facing the planet today. Several methods have been used to measure forest degradation, including spatiotemporal model analysis, satellite analysis, remote sensing, time series data, geospatial techniques, and most recently aerial drone imagery. However, few studies have used economic valuation methods to assess forest degradation. Therefore, this research aimed to identify the methods used the economic assessment of forest degradation. This systematic review was carried out using PRISMA guidelines. Research articles on the economic valuation of forest resource loss, published from 2015 to 2022, were electronically collected from three databases. Three independent reviewers, with the third acting as referee, inventoried articles, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in the articles included in the study. A total of 10,095 articles were identified, including one article from the grey literature. Only five articles met the eligibility criteria. A qualitative content analysis was performed on the extracted data. The selected articles used various methods. However, only a few articles used the contingent valuation method, even though this is indicated for estimating the highest economic value of forests. Based on forest functions, the articles evaluated erosion due to the absence of trees, wood loss, recreation areas and externalities due to forest loss, air quality, water regulation, food supply, and wildlife. The main limitation of this review was the small number of studies included, which may have affected the findings. The study protocol is registered in PROSPERO under the number CRD42021223242
森林资源退化的经济评估方法:系统回顾
森林退化是当今地球面临的挑战之一。衡量森林退化的方法有多种,包括时空模型分析、卫星分析、遥感、时间序列数据、地理空间技术以及最新的无人机航拍图像。然而,很少有研究使用经济估值方法来评估森林退化。因此,本研究旨在确定用于森林退化经济评估的方法。本系统综述采用 PRISMA 指南进行。从三个数据库中以电子方式收集了 2015 年至 2022 年间发表的有关森林资源损失经济评价的研究文章。三位独立审稿人(其中第三位担任裁判)对文章进行了清点、数据提取,并对纳入研究的文章进行了偏倚风险评估。共鉴定了 10,095 篇文章,包括一篇灰色文献。只有五篇文章符合资格标准。对提取的数据进行了定性内容分析。所选文章使用了各种方法。不过,只有少数文章使用了或有估值法,尽管这种方法适用于估算森林的最高经济价值。根据森林功能,这些文章评估了由于没有树木而造成的侵蚀、木材损失、休闲区以及由于森林损失、空气质量、水调节、食物供应和野生动物而造成的外部效应。本综述的主要局限性在于纳入的研究数量较少,这可能会影响研究结果。研究方案已在 PROSPERO 注册,注册号为 CRD42021223242
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信