Clinical assessment of recovery from neuromuscular blockers, is it a safe practise - An observational study

Govind Shaji, Gayatri Mishra
{"title":"Clinical assessment of recovery from neuromuscular blockers, is it a safe practise - An observational study","authors":"Govind Shaji, Gayatri Mishra","doi":"10.18231/j.ijca.2024.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The incidence of residual neuromuscular paralysis (RNMB) with Train of four ratio<0.9 remains as high as 16% in PACU even after administration of reversal when neuromuscular monitoring is not done. Reversal with standard dose of neostigmine and extubation are done based on the clinical signs. We observed the clinical signs of neuromuscular recovery and correlated with neuromuscular monitoring to assess the degree of residual blockade in the post-operative period.100 Patients posted for surgery under general anaesthesia with endotracheal tube intubation and controlled ventilation were enrolled for the study after obtaining human ethical approval. Standard anaesthesia technique using morphine, propofol, vecuronium, isoflurane with low flow anaesthesia were administered for all patients. TOF was noted at the end of surgical procedure when patient resumed spontaneous respiration, during extubation, and at 15 minutes interval for one hour in the postoperative period. Hemodynamics were observed including respiratory rate. Overall 32 percent of patients had residual paralysis. 27% at 15 min, 26% at 30min, 6% at 45min and 3% at one hour in the postoperative period showed RNMB. Subgroup analysis showed that at the time administration of reversal 72 patients had (TOFR>0.4) and 28 had (TOFR<.0.4), showed significant difference in improvement in TOFR between 2 subgroups before reversal, immediate extubation and 15 min post extubation (p=0.00,0.001,0.003,) respectively. Clinical findings of neuromuscular reversal is not foolproof for complete recovery and standard dose neostigmine given during shallow block will accentuate the residual neuromuscular paralysis.","PeriodicalId":13310,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia","volume":" 45","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2024.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The incidence of residual neuromuscular paralysis (RNMB) with Train of four ratio<0.9 remains as high as 16% in PACU even after administration of reversal when neuromuscular monitoring is not done. Reversal with standard dose of neostigmine and extubation are done based on the clinical signs. We observed the clinical signs of neuromuscular recovery and correlated with neuromuscular monitoring to assess the degree of residual blockade in the post-operative period.100 Patients posted for surgery under general anaesthesia with endotracheal tube intubation and controlled ventilation were enrolled for the study after obtaining human ethical approval. Standard anaesthesia technique using morphine, propofol, vecuronium, isoflurane with low flow anaesthesia were administered for all patients. TOF was noted at the end of surgical procedure when patient resumed spontaneous respiration, during extubation, and at 15 minutes interval for one hour in the postoperative period. Hemodynamics were observed including respiratory rate. Overall 32 percent of patients had residual paralysis. 27% at 15 min, 26% at 30min, 6% at 45min and 3% at one hour in the postoperative period showed RNMB. Subgroup analysis showed that at the time administration of reversal 72 patients had (TOFR>0.4) and 28 had (TOFR<.0.4), showed significant difference in improvement in TOFR between 2 subgroups before reversal, immediate extubation and 15 min post extubation (p=0.00,0.001,0.003,) respectively. Clinical findings of neuromuscular reversal is not foolproof for complete recovery and standard dose neostigmine given during shallow block will accentuate the residual neuromuscular paralysis.
对神经肌肉阻滞剂恢复情况进行临床评估,这种做法是否安全--一项观察性研究
残余神经肌肉麻痹(RNMB)的发生率(Train of four ratio0.4)和 28 例(TOFR<.0.4)显示,在逆转前、立即拔管和拔管后 15 分钟这两个亚组之间,TOFR 的改善程度存在显著差异(P=0.00,0.001,0.003,)。神经肌肉逆转的临床结果并不能保证完全恢复,在浅阻滞期间给予标准剂量的新斯的明会加重残余的神经肌肉麻痹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信