Comparison of post-operative analgesia with caudal Ropivacaine and Levobupivacaine in pediatric patients undergoing infraumbilical surgery under general anaesthesia

U. Hariharan, Shashi Kumar Gupta, V. Nagpal, S. Wasnik
{"title":"Comparison of post-operative analgesia with caudal Ropivacaine and Levobupivacaine in pediatric patients undergoing infraumbilical surgery under general anaesthesia","authors":"U. Hariharan, Shashi Kumar Gupta, V. Nagpal, S. Wasnik","doi":"10.18231/j.ijca.2024.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Post-operative pain relief following pediatric abdominal surgery is of paramount consideration and caudal block is still a popular, easy as well as safe analgesic technique for effective analgesia in children. With the advent of newer local anaesthetics, there has been a renewed interest in pediatric caudal blocks after lower abdominal surgeries following general anaesthesia. The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and duration of postoperative analgesia using caudal Ropivacaine and Levobupivacaine in pediatric patients undergoing infraumbilical surgery under general anaesthesia.: The study was conducted on sixty, ASA grade 1, pediatric patients of age 2 to 6 years, of either sex, posted for elective infraumbilical surgery under general anaesthesia. They were randomly divided in two groups of 30 patients each. Group 1: - (n = 30) received caudal block with injection Ropivacaine, 0.25%, 1ml/kg. Group 2: - (n = 30) received caudal block with injection Levobupivacaine, 0.25%, 1ml/kg. Comparative, randomized, single blinded, observational study. : The demographic data was comparable in both the groups. Postoperatively, the quality of analgesia was assessed by the MOP (Modified Objective Pain Scale) score. Duration of postoperative analgesia was assessed by noting the time of giving rescue analgesia in the post-operative period. We also noted side effects, if any in both the groups. The quality of analgesia was found to be similar with both the drug groups (p value >0.05). The duration of analgesia was longer and statistically significant (p value = 0.0006) in the Ropivacaine group (8.43 ± 0.77 hours) as compared to the Levobupivacaine group (7.03 ± 2.03 hours). Statistically significant difference (P value = 0.026) was seen in the requirement rescue analgesia between Ropivacaine (3.33%) and Levobupivacaine (26.67%) groups. There were no major side effects in either of the groups, apart from a single patient out of 30 patients of Levobupivacaine group who had vomiting, compared with none in the Ropivacaine group.We conclude that caudal block with 0.25% Ropivacaine has a longer duration of action as compared to 0.25% Levobupivacaine in children undergoing infraumbilical surgery under general anaesthesia. Both Ropivacaine and Levobupivacaine, have similar quality of postoperative analgesia and side effect profile.","PeriodicalId":13310,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia","volume":" 48","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2024.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Post-operative pain relief following pediatric abdominal surgery is of paramount consideration and caudal block is still a popular, easy as well as safe analgesic technique for effective analgesia in children. With the advent of newer local anaesthetics, there has been a renewed interest in pediatric caudal blocks after lower abdominal surgeries following general anaesthesia. The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and duration of postoperative analgesia using caudal Ropivacaine and Levobupivacaine in pediatric patients undergoing infraumbilical surgery under general anaesthesia.: The study was conducted on sixty, ASA grade 1, pediatric patients of age 2 to 6 years, of either sex, posted for elective infraumbilical surgery under general anaesthesia. They were randomly divided in two groups of 30 patients each. Group 1: - (n = 30) received caudal block with injection Ropivacaine, 0.25%, 1ml/kg. Group 2: - (n = 30) received caudal block with injection Levobupivacaine, 0.25%, 1ml/kg. Comparative, randomized, single blinded, observational study. : The demographic data was comparable in both the groups. Postoperatively, the quality of analgesia was assessed by the MOP (Modified Objective Pain Scale) score. Duration of postoperative analgesia was assessed by noting the time of giving rescue analgesia in the post-operative period. We also noted side effects, if any in both the groups. The quality of analgesia was found to be similar with both the drug groups (p value >0.05). The duration of analgesia was longer and statistically significant (p value = 0.0006) in the Ropivacaine group (8.43 ± 0.77 hours) as compared to the Levobupivacaine group (7.03 ± 2.03 hours). Statistically significant difference (P value = 0.026) was seen in the requirement rescue analgesia between Ropivacaine (3.33%) and Levobupivacaine (26.67%) groups. There were no major side effects in either of the groups, apart from a single patient out of 30 patients of Levobupivacaine group who had vomiting, compared with none in the Ropivacaine group.We conclude that caudal block with 0.25% Ropivacaine has a longer duration of action as compared to 0.25% Levobupivacaine in children undergoing infraumbilical surgery under general anaesthesia. Both Ropivacaine and Levobupivacaine, have similar quality of postoperative analgesia and side effect profile.
全身麻醉下接受脐下手术的小儿患者术后使用尾部罗哌卡因和左旋布比卡因镇痛的比较
小儿腹部手术后的镇痛是最重要的考虑因素,而尾部阻滞仍然是小儿有效镇痛的常用、简便和安全的镇痛技术。随着新型局麻药的出现,小儿下腹部手术后全身麻醉后的尾部阻滞再次受到关注。我们的研究旨在比较使用罗哌卡因和左旋布比卡因对在全身麻醉下进行脐下手术的小儿患者进行术后镇痛的疗效和持续时间。 研究对象为 60 名年龄在 2 至 6 岁之间的 ASA 1 级小儿患者,性别不限,均在全身麻醉下接受脐下手术。他们被随机分为两组,每组 30 人。第一组:-(30 人)接受 0.25% 罗哌卡因注射液(1 毫升/公斤)的尾部阻滞。第 2 组:-(n = 30)接受注射左旋布比卡因(0.25%,1 毫升/千克)的尾阻滞。对比、随机、单盲、观察性研究:两组的人口统计学数据具有可比性。术后镇痛质量由 MOP(改良客观疼痛量表)评分评估。术后镇痛持续时间通过记录术后给予镇痛抢救的时间来评估。我们还记录了两组患者可能出现的副作用。结果发现,两组药物的镇痛质量相似(P 值大于 0.05)。罗哌卡因组的镇痛时间(8.43 ± 0.77 小时)比左布比卡因组(7.03 ± 2.03 小时)更长,差异有统计学意义(P 值 = 0.0006)。罗哌卡因组(3.33%)和左旋布比卡因组(26.67%)的镇痛抢救需要量有明显的统计学差异(P 值 = 0.026)。我们的结论是,与 0.25% 左旋布比卡因相比,在全身麻醉下接受脐下手术的儿童中,0.25% 罗哌卡因的尾部阻滞作用持续时间更长。罗哌卡因和左旋布比卡因的术后镇痛质量和副作用相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信