Role Of Visum Et Revertum And Provision In The Process Of Civil Action And Proposal Of Coveration (Study Resolution Number 50/Pid.Sus-Kids/2023/Pt Medan)
Gusria Amara, Risdalina Siregar, Indra Kumala, Sari Munthe
{"title":"Role Of Visum Et Revertum And Provision In The Process Of Civil Action And Proposal Of Coveration (Study Resolution Number 50/Pid.Sus-Kids/2023/Pt Medan)","authors":"Gusria Amara, Risdalina Siregar, Indra Kumala, Sari Munthe","doi":"10.38035/jlph.v4i3.326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proof is the most important thing in the judicial process, it is used to find the material truth that is the complete truth of a criminal case. In proof there are various means of proof such as testimony of witnesses, expert testimonies, letters, instructions, and indictments of the accused. In criminal acts of persecution, asylum, and murder, visum et repertum is often used as a means of proof in its proof. The study aims to identify and analyze the role of visum et repertum (ver) in the proof of a criminal offence under the Code of Criminal Procedure Law (KUHAP), and the function of visa et repertrum (ver), in the study of judgment No. 50/pid.sus-anak/2023/pt field). This research includes a type of normative jurisprudence that is supported by empirical research to obtain accurate or valid data. Based on the research carried out on the case study of judgment No. 50/PID.SUS-ANAK/2023/PT MEDAN) No.1267/ PID/B/2010/PN.JKT.BAR, it is a legal proof tool that has a connection to the judge in particular in decision-making. Nevertheless, the judge is free to judge the truth contained in the evidence of a letter issued by such an expert. Therefore, in deciding a matter, return to the judge himself, which is to be based on the reasoning and consideration of the law. Furthermore, as one of the means of proof referred to in article 184, paragraph (1) of the Covenant, the visa et repertum shall be the discretion of the judge and shall be used as a guideline or as a grip in delivering a sentence against the offender. For in the testimony of the expert, the testimony of the judiciary called Visum et repertum, so clearly described what really is the cause of a crime, whether it is persecution, serious injuries if resulting in death.","PeriodicalId":397335,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities","volume":" 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i3.326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Proof is the most important thing in the judicial process, it is used to find the material truth that is the complete truth of a criminal case. In proof there are various means of proof such as testimony of witnesses, expert testimonies, letters, instructions, and indictments of the accused. In criminal acts of persecution, asylum, and murder, visum et repertum is often used as a means of proof in its proof. The study aims to identify and analyze the role of visum et repertum (ver) in the proof of a criminal offence under the Code of Criminal Procedure Law (KUHAP), and the function of visa et repertrum (ver), in the study of judgment No. 50/pid.sus-anak/2023/pt field). This research includes a type of normative jurisprudence that is supported by empirical research to obtain accurate or valid data. Based on the research carried out on the case study of judgment No. 50/PID.SUS-ANAK/2023/PT MEDAN) No.1267/ PID/B/2010/PN.JKT.BAR, it is a legal proof tool that has a connection to the judge in particular in decision-making. Nevertheless, the judge is free to judge the truth contained in the evidence of a letter issued by such an expert. Therefore, in deciding a matter, return to the judge himself, which is to be based on the reasoning and consideration of the law. Furthermore, as one of the means of proof referred to in article 184, paragraph (1) of the Covenant, the visa et repertum shall be the discretion of the judge and shall be used as a guideline or as a grip in delivering a sentence against the offender. For in the testimony of the expert, the testimony of the judiciary called Visum et repertum, so clearly described what really is the cause of a crime, whether it is persecution, serious injuries if resulting in death.
在司法程序中,证明是最重要的事情,它被用来发现实质真相,即刑事案件的全部真相。在证明中,有证人证言、专家证言、信件、指示和被告起诉书等多种证明手段。在迫害、庇护和谋杀等犯罪行为中,visum et repertum 常被用作其证明中的一种证明手段。本研究旨在通过对第 50/pid.sus-anak/2023/pt field)号判决书的研究,确定并分析《刑事诉讼法典》(KUHAP)规定的 visum et repertum(ver)在刑事犯罪证明中的作用,以及 visa et repertrum(ver)的功能。该研究包括一种以实证研究为支撑的规范法学,以获得准确或有效的数据。根据对第 50/PID.SUS-ANAK/2023/PT MEDAN 号判决进行的案例研究)根据对第 1267/ PID/B/2010/PN.JKT.BAR 号判决的案例研究,它是一种法律证明工具,尤其与法官的决策有关。尽管如此,法官仍可自由判断由此类专家出具的信函证据所包含的真实性。因此,在对某一事项做出决定时,应回到法官本身,这要基于对法律的推理和考虑。此外,作为《公约》第 184 条第(1)款中提及的证据手段之一,"签证等证据 "应由法官酌情决定,并应作为对罪犯量刑的准则或抓手。因为在专家的证词中,司法机关的证词被称为 Visum et repertum,它清楚地描述了犯罪的真正原因,无论是迫害、严重伤害还是导致死亡。