Validity of iPhone health application step count in semi free-living conditions

Q3 Engineering
Pedro Judice, Jorge Fouto, Miguel Horta, Sara Pereira
{"title":"Validity of iPhone health application step count in semi free-living conditions","authors":"Pedro Judice, Jorge Fouto, Miguel Horta, Sara Pereira","doi":"10.21014/actaimeko.v13i1.1673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The iPhone’s validity for measuring steps has been mainly investigated under laboratory conditions, while studies that include real-world conditions are still scarce. We examined the validity of iPhones in measuring steps in real-world walking conditions, while using direct observation with video as reference. A sample of 100 adults who owned an iPhone 5S or higher was included and participants were randomly allocated to one of two protocols. Limits of Agreement (LoA), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), linear-regression and Bland-Altman analyses were carried out. In Protocol-1, which includes straight-line and zigzag conditions, we observed a low MAPE lower than 4%. Bland-Altman analyses assessed a high accordance of approximately 6 steps under both conditions. Differences between the iPhone and direct observation were only noticeable in straight-line condition (p = 0.002). Likewise, protocol-2 (three 50-step conditions: an upward 5 % slope, a flat surface, and a downward -5% slope) showed low MAPE values (3.78 %) for the upward slope, 2.41 % for the downward slope, and 2.37 % in absence of slope), and differences between the iPhone and direct observation were only observed for the downward slope (p = 0.017), with the iPhone overestimating. Our findings revealed that iPhone might be a reliable tool for monitoring walking in real-life conditions, however, downward slope seems to generate overestimation, which deserves future investigation.","PeriodicalId":37987,"journal":{"name":"Acta IMEKO","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta IMEKO","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21014/actaimeko.v13i1.1673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The iPhone’s validity for measuring steps has been mainly investigated under laboratory conditions, while studies that include real-world conditions are still scarce. We examined the validity of iPhones in measuring steps in real-world walking conditions, while using direct observation with video as reference. A sample of 100 adults who owned an iPhone 5S or higher was included and participants were randomly allocated to one of two protocols. Limits of Agreement (LoA), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), linear-regression and Bland-Altman analyses were carried out. In Protocol-1, which includes straight-line and zigzag conditions, we observed a low MAPE lower than 4%. Bland-Altman analyses assessed a high accordance of approximately 6 steps under both conditions. Differences between the iPhone and direct observation were only noticeable in straight-line condition (p = 0.002). Likewise, protocol-2 (three 50-step conditions: an upward 5 % slope, a flat surface, and a downward -5% slope) showed low MAPE values (3.78 %) for the upward slope, 2.41 % for the downward slope, and 2.37 % in absence of slope), and differences between the iPhone and direct observation were only observed for the downward slope (p = 0.017), with the iPhone overestimating. Our findings revealed that iPhone might be a reliable tool for monitoring walking in real-life conditions, however, downward slope seems to generate overestimation, which deserves future investigation.
半自由生活条件下 iPhone 健康应用计步的有效性
iPhone 测量步数的有效性主要是在实验室条件下进行的,而包括真实世界条件的研究仍然很少。我们研究了 iPhone 在真实世界步行条件下测量步数的有效性,同时使用视频作为参考进行直接观察。我们对 100 名拥有 iPhone 5S 或更高版本的成年人进行了抽样调查,参与者被随机分配到两种方案中的一种。研究人员进行了协议限(LoA)、平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)、线性回归和布兰-阿尔特曼分析。在协议-1(包括直线和之字形条件)中,我们观察到 MAPE 很低,低于 4%。布兰-阿尔特曼分析结果表明,在这两种条件下,MAPE 都达到了约 6 级。iPhone 与直接观察之间的差异仅在直线条件下明显(p = 0.002)。同样,协议-2(三种 50 步条件:向上 5% 的斜坡、平坦表面和向下 -5% 的斜坡)显示,向上斜坡的 MAPE 值较低(3.78%),向下斜坡的 MAPE 值为 2.41%,无斜坡的 MAPE 值为 2.37%。我们的研究结果表明,iPhone 可能是在现实条件下监测行走情况的可靠工具,但下坡似乎会产生高估,这值得今后研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta IMEKO
Acta IMEKO Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: The main goal of this journal is the enhancement of academic activities of IMEKO and a wider dissemination of scientific output from IMEKO TC events. High-quality papers presented at IMEKO conferences, workshops or congresses are seleted by the event organizers and the authors are invited to publish an enhanced version of their paper in this journal. The journal also publishes scientific articles on measurement and instrumentation not related to an IMEKO event.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信