Epidemiology of Febrile Neutropenic and Bacteremic Patients in the Extensively Drug-Resistant Era

IF 0.5 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
U. Elbahr, Amira Ahmed, Suha Hejres, Z. Surmeli, Cigdem Ozturk-Pala, Clark Steven Delos Reyes, Mohamed Elbahr, H. Ankarali, Jordi Rello, Hakan Erdem
{"title":"Epidemiology of Febrile Neutropenic and Bacteremic Patients in the Extensively Drug-Resistant Era","authors":"U. Elbahr, Amira Ahmed, Suha Hejres, Z. Surmeli, Cigdem Ozturk-Pala, Clark Steven Delos Reyes, Mohamed Elbahr, H. Ankarali, Jordi Rello, Hakan Erdem","doi":"10.5812/archcid-135472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Appropriate empiric antibiotic use is of utmost importance in febrile neutropenic patients. This study analyzed positive blood culture reports from febrile neutropenic patients and provided a new empirical antibiotic treatment approach. Methods: This study retrospectively enrolled febrile neutropenic patients with hematological or solid organ malignancies who had positive blood cultures at the Bahrain Oncology Center within January 2019 to August 2021. Microbiological data were used to draw inferences for rational antimicrobial treatment. The quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score was employed to classify the severity status. The t-test was used to compare univariate and multivariate sensitivity values for two dependent proportions. Results: A total of 73 episodes of bacteremia were detected in 53 patients. Among these, 54 episodes (74%) were caused by gram-negative organisms. The most commonly isolated organisms were Escherichia coli (30%), Klebsiella pneumonia (22%), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (11%). The rate of extensively drug-resistant strains among K. pneumoniae was 44% (n = 7). Among gram-negative microorganisms, the susceptibility rates for monotherapies were reported for ceftazidime (56%), piperacillin/tazobactam (76%), cefepime (54%), meropenem (80%), and ceftazidime-avibactam (91%). The susceptibility rates for tigecycline-based combinations exceeded 90% overall. Conclusions: Clinical severity and local epidemiological data should be considered in the management of febrile neutropenia. New antibiotics and tigecycline should be considered for combination therapy in selected cases due to the increasing resistance observed.","PeriodicalId":51793,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/archcid-135472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Appropriate empiric antibiotic use is of utmost importance in febrile neutropenic patients. This study analyzed positive blood culture reports from febrile neutropenic patients and provided a new empirical antibiotic treatment approach. Methods: This study retrospectively enrolled febrile neutropenic patients with hematological or solid organ malignancies who had positive blood cultures at the Bahrain Oncology Center within January 2019 to August 2021. Microbiological data were used to draw inferences for rational antimicrobial treatment. The quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score was employed to classify the severity status. The t-test was used to compare univariate and multivariate sensitivity values for two dependent proportions. Results: A total of 73 episodes of bacteremia were detected in 53 patients. Among these, 54 episodes (74%) were caused by gram-negative organisms. The most commonly isolated organisms were Escherichia coli (30%), Klebsiella pneumonia (22%), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (11%). The rate of extensively drug-resistant strains among K. pneumoniae was 44% (n = 7). Among gram-negative microorganisms, the susceptibility rates for monotherapies were reported for ceftazidime (56%), piperacillin/tazobactam (76%), cefepime (54%), meropenem (80%), and ceftazidime-avibactam (91%). The susceptibility rates for tigecycline-based combinations exceeded 90% overall. Conclusions: Clinical severity and local epidemiological data should be considered in the management of febrile neutropenia. New antibiotics and tigecycline should be considered for combination therapy in selected cases due to the increasing resistance observed.
广泛耐药时代发热性中性粒细胞减少症和菌血症患者的流行病学研究
背景:对于发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者而言,合理使用经验性抗生素至关重要。本研究分析了发热性中性粒细胞增多症患者的血培养阳性报告,并提供了一种新的经验性抗生素治疗方法。研究方法本研究回顾性地纳入了2019年1月至2021年8月期间在巴林肿瘤中心血培养阳性的血液或实体器官恶性肿瘤发热性中性粒细胞减少患者。微生物学数据用于推断合理的抗菌治疗。采用快速序贯器官功能衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分对严重程度进行分类。采用 t 检验比较两个因变量比例的单变量和多变量灵敏度值。结果53 名患者共发生 73 次菌血症。其中 54 例(74%)由革兰氏阴性菌引起。最常见的分离菌是大肠埃希菌(30%)、肺炎克雷伯菌(22%)和凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(11%)。肺炎克雷伯菌中广泛耐药菌株的比例为 44%(n = 7)。在革兰氏阴性微生物中,头孢他啶(56%)、哌拉西林/他唑巴坦(76%)、头孢吡肟(54%)、美罗培南(80%)和头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(91%)的单药敏感率均有报告。基于替加环素的组合药物的药敏率总体超过 90%。结论在治疗发热性中性粒细胞减少症时,应考虑临床严重程度和当地流行病学数据。由于所观察到的耐药性不断增加,在选定病例中应考虑使用新抗生素和替加环素进行联合治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Archives of Clinical Infectious Diseases is a peer-reviewed multi-disciplinary medical publication, scheduled to appear quarterly serving as a means for scientific information exchange in the international medical forum. The journal particularly welcomes contributions relevant to the Middle-East region and publishes biomedical experiences and clinical investigations on prevalent infectious diseases in the region as well as analysis of factors that may modulate the incidence, course, and management of infectious diseases and pertinent medical problems in the Middle East.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信