Prediction of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome by Quantitative ultrasound texture analysis of fetal lung Observational cross section study

Essam Elgendy, Saad El Gelany, Moamen Hassan, Abd Elrahman Abd Elwahab, Amr Mahmoud
{"title":"Prediction of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome by Quantitative ultrasound texture analysis of fetal lung Observational cross section study","authors":"Essam Elgendy, Saad El Gelany, Moamen Hassan, Abd Elrahman Abd Elwahab, Amr Mahmoud","doi":"10.21608/mjmr.2024.265055.1680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To predict respiratory distress syndrome using a noninvasive method called quantitative ultrasonography study of fetal lung texture. A cohort of 304 cases and was conducted in the feto maternity unit of Minia Maternity and Children University Hospital over 3 years. Fetal lung images were used to develop a computerized method based on texture analysis and machine learning algorithms, trained to predict neonatal respiratory morbidity risk on fetal lung ultrasound images. In the Control group, the range of the Replication Index (RI) was between 0.58 and 1.04, with a mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 0.82 ± 0.1. In the RD group, the RI varied from 0.53 to 1.06, with a mean ± SD of 0.77 ± 0.13. There was a statistically significant difference (p= 0.002) between the two groups. There was no notable disparity observed in the texture lung analysis when utilizing automated tools between the two groups. The research showed a significant and meaningful difference between the groups regarding Doppler indices. There was no significant differenceThere was a significant difference in occupation between the two groups tested, with a p-value of less than .001. A significant discrepancy was observed between the two analyzed groups (p= <.001). Regarding Parity, there was no statistically significant difference seen between the two groups being analyzed (p= 0.057). The research showed a significant and meaningful difference between the groups being studied in terms of LMP GA (gestational age) and AFI. Specifically, the RDS group had a much lower AFI compared to the other groups regarding texture lung analysis.","PeriodicalId":506791,"journal":{"name":"Minia Journal of Medical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minia Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/mjmr.2024.265055.1680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To predict respiratory distress syndrome using a noninvasive method called quantitative ultrasonography study of fetal lung texture. A cohort of 304 cases and was conducted in the feto maternity unit of Minia Maternity and Children University Hospital over 3 years. Fetal lung images were used to develop a computerized method based on texture analysis and machine learning algorithms, trained to predict neonatal respiratory morbidity risk on fetal lung ultrasound images. In the Control group, the range of the Replication Index (RI) was between 0.58 and 1.04, with a mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 0.82 ± 0.1. In the RD group, the RI varied from 0.53 to 1.06, with a mean ± SD of 0.77 ± 0.13. There was a statistically significant difference (p= 0.002) between the two groups. There was no notable disparity observed in the texture lung analysis when utilizing automated tools between the two groups. The research showed a significant and meaningful difference between the groups regarding Doppler indices. There was no significant differenceThere was a significant difference in occupation between the two groups tested, with a p-value of less than .001. A significant discrepancy was observed between the two analyzed groups (p= <.001). Regarding Parity, there was no statistically significant difference seen between the two groups being analyzed (p= 0.057). The research showed a significant and meaningful difference between the groups being studied in terms of LMP GA (gestational age) and AFI. Specifically, the RDS group had a much lower AFI compared to the other groups regarding texture lung analysis.
通过胎肺定量超声纹理分析预测新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征 观察性横断面研究
使用一种名为胎儿肺纹理定量超声波检查的无创方法预测呼吸窘迫综合征。在米尼亚妇幼保健大学医院的胎儿产科进行了为期 3 年的研究,共收集了 304 个病例。胎儿肺部图像被用于开发一种基于纹理分析和机器学习算法的计算机化方法,该方法经过训练,可预测胎儿肺部超声图像上的新生儿呼吸系统发病风险。对照组的复制指数(RI)范围在 0.58 至 1.04 之间,平均值(SD)为 0.82 ± 0.1。在 RD 组中,RI 在 0.53 至 1.06 之间变化,平均 ± 标准差为 0.77 ± 0.13。两组之间的差异具有统计学意义(P= 0.002)。在使用自动化工具进行肺纹理分析时,两组之间没有观察到明显的差异。研究显示,两组在多普勒指数方面存在明显且有意义的差异。两组受试者在职业方面没有明显差异,P 值小于 0.001。两个分析组之间存在明显差异(p= <.001)。在均等性方面,被分析的两组之间没有统计学意义上的显著差异(p= 0.057)。研究显示,在 LMP GA(胎龄)和 AFI 方面,研究组之间存在明显而有意义的差异。具体来说,就肺纹理分析而言,RDS 组的 AFI 比其他组低得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信