Between ontologies and practices: How to deal with democratic theory?

IF 8.2 1区社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY

Dialogues in Human Geography Pub Date : 2024-03-24 DOI:10.1177/20438206241240218

Daniel A. de Azevedo

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Criticism about the role of ontologies in geographical research has gained strength in recent years, especially following the work of Clive Barnett. Bodden's intervention aims to contribute to this debate through the philosophy of language. In this commentary, I reflect on the relationship between theory and practice within democratic theory, and present some reflections for taking this debate forward.

查看原文本刊更多论文

本体论与实践之间：如何处理民主理论？

近年来，对本体论在地理学研究中的作用的批评越来越多，尤其是在克莱夫-巴尼特（Clive Barnett）的研究之后。博登的发言旨在通过语言哲学为这一争论做出贡献。在这篇评论中，我对民主理论中理论与实践之间的关系进行了反思，并提出了一些推进这场辩论的思考。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Dialogues in Human Geography GEOGRAPHY-

CiteScore

8.00

自引率

4.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Dialogues in Human Geography aims to foster open and critical debate on the philosophical, methodological, and pedagogical underpinnings of geographic thought and practice. The journal publishes articles, accompanied by responses, that critique current thinking and practice while charting future directions for geographic thought, empirical research, and pedagogy. Dialogues is theoretically oriented, forward-looking, and seeks to publish original and innovative work that expands the boundaries of geographical theory, practice, and pedagogy through a unique format of open peer commentary. This format encourages engaged dialogue. The journal's scope encompasses the broader agenda of human geography within the context of social sciences, humanities, and environmental sciences, as well as specific ideas, debates, and practices within disciplinary subfields. It is relevant and useful to those interested in all aspects of the discipline.