A Direct Approach to Civic Formation that Preserves the Spirit of Pure Liberal Education

Christopher William Love
{"title":"A Direct Approach to Civic Formation that Preserves the Spirit of Pure Liberal Education","authors":"Christopher William Love","doi":"10.1093/jopedu/qhae025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n According to one historic view of liberal education, such education is incompatible with the express pursuit of civic goods. Call that view ‘pure liberal education’. Students engaged in pure liberal education are set free, temporarily, from utilitarian concerns, for a course of study aimed at intrinsic goods—most notably knowledge but also the formation of a virtuous mind. Proponents claim that a direct pursuit of civic goods would compromise the mode, matter, and/or integrity of pure liberal education—i.e. its freedom from utilitarian concern, its wide-ranging and intrinsically-valuable subject matter, and its commitment to following the truth wherever it leads. In reply, I offer a pedagogy that requires (almost) no departure from the pure liberal ideal yet which reserves a modest, though important, place for civic formation. That place emerges from the fact that academic and civic life ‘overlap’ in an important respect: both involve a conversation and thus a common set of virtues. The latter consist in those practices and dispositions that enable the conversation to go well, by encouraging mutual understanding and the formation of true beliefs. The existence of this overlap provides a way for pure liberal educators, who already expressly influence their student’s academic formation, to likewise influence their civic formation. It consists in teachers consciously developing those virtues in their students, along with an awareness of the virtues’ relevance for civic life. This pedagogy retains the matter and integrity of pure liberal education, with only brief introductions of the practical mode.","PeriodicalId":506406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Philosophy of Education","volume":" 48","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Philosophy of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhae025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to one historic view of liberal education, such education is incompatible with the express pursuit of civic goods. Call that view ‘pure liberal education’. Students engaged in pure liberal education are set free, temporarily, from utilitarian concerns, for a course of study aimed at intrinsic goods—most notably knowledge but also the formation of a virtuous mind. Proponents claim that a direct pursuit of civic goods would compromise the mode, matter, and/or integrity of pure liberal education—i.e. its freedom from utilitarian concern, its wide-ranging and intrinsically-valuable subject matter, and its commitment to following the truth wherever it leads. In reply, I offer a pedagogy that requires (almost) no departure from the pure liberal ideal yet which reserves a modest, though important, place for civic formation. That place emerges from the fact that academic and civic life ‘overlap’ in an important respect: both involve a conversation and thus a common set of virtues. The latter consist in those practices and dispositions that enable the conversation to go well, by encouraging mutual understanding and the formation of true beliefs. The existence of this overlap provides a way for pure liberal educators, who already expressly influence their student’s academic formation, to likewise influence their civic formation. It consists in teachers consciously developing those virtues in their students, along with an awareness of the virtues’ relevance for civic life. This pedagogy retains the matter and integrity of pure liberal education, with only brief introductions of the practical mode.
保留纯粹通识教育精神的公民培养直接方法
根据历史上对通识教育的一种看法,这种教育与对公民产品的明确追求是不相容的。这种观点被称为 "纯粹的通识教育"。接受纯粹通识教育的学生暂时摆脱了功利主义的考量,他们的学习目标是内在的物品--最主要的是知识,但也包括美德心灵的形成。支持者声称,直接追求公民价值会损害纯粹通识教育的模式、内容和/或完整性--也就是说,纯粹通识教育不受功利主义的影响,其内容广泛且具有内在价值,并致力于追随真理的指引。作为回应,我提出了一种教学法,这种教学法(几乎)不需要偏离纯粹的通识教育理想,但却为公民培养保留了一个适度但却重要的位置。这个位置来自于学术生活和公民生活在一个重要方面 "重叠 "的事实:两者都涉及对话,因此也涉及一套共同的美德。后者包括通过鼓励相互理解和形成真正的信念,使对话得以顺利进行的做法和态度。这种重叠的存在为纯粹的通识教育者提供了一种途径,他们已经明确影响了学生的学术培养,同样也影响了他们的公民培养。它包括教师有意识地培养学生的这些美德,以及对这些美德与公民生活相关性的认识。这种教学法保留了纯粹通识教育的内容和完整性,只是简单介绍了实践模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信