The “comply or explain” principle in corporate governance statements in Poland

Elżbieta-Izabela Szczepankiewicz, Joanna Błażyńska, Beata Zaleska, Hanna Czaja-Cieszyńska, D. Kordela
{"title":"The “comply or explain” principle in corporate governance statements in Poland","authors":"Elżbieta-Izabela Szczepankiewicz, Joanna Błażyńska, Beata Zaleska, Hanna Czaja-Cieszyńska, D. Kordela","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0054.4087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Each entity that submits a corporate governance statement is required to indicate the principles that it did not apply and to explain the circumstances and reasons for not applying them. The objective of this article is to assess the scope of corporate governance reporting in Poland, with a particular focus on the areas where companies deviated from applying corporate governance principles.Methodology/approach: The study involved 280 corporate governance statements made by 140 listed companies on the Warsaw Stock Exchange (WSE-LCs). The time scope of the study covers the years 2020–2021, as in that period, the scope of applying good practices of corporate governance was changed at the WSE. In addition to the content analysis of corporate governance statements, the study also applied the following research methods: bibliometric analysis, a critical review of the literature, comparative analysis, as well as induction and synthesis methods used in formulating the conclusions.Findings: The results of our empirical research demonstrate that the companies took various approaches to reporting their corporate governance obligations. In 2020, the full application of Best Practices for WSE-LCs was declared by only five companies, and in 2021, only four. This means that the other companies departed from applying them to a smaller or larger extent. While the Best Practices for WSE-LCs 2016 included only one recommendation and eight detailed principles from which at least 20% of the companies deviated, with regard to Best Practices for WSE-LCs 2021 that number was as many as 14 principles. This makes it possible to conclude that the 2021 amendment of the corporate governance good practices code affected the implementation of the “com-ply or explain” principle compared to the previous year.Originality/value: This article fits into the current trend of research on non-financial reporting, in particular, changes to the application of corporate governance principles. The article also fills a research gap, defining the key areas of departures from applying corporate governance principles, which were identified for Polish listed companies. The results may be of interest to both academia and the examined entities.","PeriodicalId":506551,"journal":{"name":"Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości","volume":" 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.4087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Each entity that submits a corporate governance statement is required to indicate the principles that it did not apply and to explain the circumstances and reasons for not applying them. The objective of this article is to assess the scope of corporate governance reporting in Poland, with a particular focus on the areas where companies deviated from applying corporate governance principles.Methodology/approach: The study involved 280 corporate governance statements made by 140 listed companies on the Warsaw Stock Exchange (WSE-LCs). The time scope of the study covers the years 2020–2021, as in that period, the scope of applying good practices of corporate governance was changed at the WSE. In addition to the content analysis of corporate governance statements, the study also applied the following research methods: bibliometric analysis, a critical review of the literature, comparative analysis, as well as induction and synthesis methods used in formulating the conclusions.Findings: The results of our empirical research demonstrate that the companies took various approaches to reporting their corporate governance obligations. In 2020, the full application of Best Practices for WSE-LCs was declared by only five companies, and in 2021, only four. This means that the other companies departed from applying them to a smaller or larger extent. While the Best Practices for WSE-LCs 2016 included only one recommendation and eight detailed principles from which at least 20% of the companies deviated, with regard to Best Practices for WSE-LCs 2021 that number was as many as 14 principles. This makes it possible to conclude that the 2021 amendment of the corporate governance good practices code affected the implementation of the “com-ply or explain” principle compared to the previous year.Originality/value: This article fits into the current trend of research on non-financial reporting, in particular, changes to the application of corporate governance principles. The article also fills a research gap, defining the key areas of departures from applying corporate governance principles, which were identified for Polish listed companies. The results may be of interest to both academia and the examined entities.
波兰公司治理声明中的 "遵守或解释 "原则
目的:每个提交公司治理报告的实体都必须说明其未采用的原则,并解释未采用这些原则的情况和原因。本文旨在评估波兰公司治理报告的范围,特别关注公司偏离公司治理原则的领域:研究涉及华沙证券交易所(WSE-LCs)140 家上市公司的 280 份公司治理报告。研究的时间范围涵盖 2020-2021 年,因为在此期间,华沙证券交易所适用公司治理良好做法的范围发生了变化。除了对公司治理声明进行内容分析外,本研究还采用了以下研究方法:文献计量分析、文献批判性回顾、比较分析,以及用于形成结论的归纳和综合方法:我们的实证研究结果表明,各公司在报告其公司治理义务时采取了不同的方法。2020 年,仅有五家公司宣布全面采用《世界证券交易所有限责任公司最佳实践》,2021 年仅有四家。这意味着,其他公司或多或少地偏离了《WSE-LC 最佳实践》。2016 年《WSE-LCs 最佳实践》只包括一项建议和八项详细原则,至少有 20% 的公司偏离了这些原则,而 2021 年《WSE-LCs 最佳实践》则多达 14 项原则。由此可以得出结论,与上一年相比,2021 年公司治理良好实践准则修正案影响了 "遵守或解释 "原则的实施:本文符合当前对非财务报告的研究趋势,尤其是对公司治理原则应用变化的研究。文章还填补了一项研究空白,界定了波兰上市公司偏离公司治理原则应用的关键领域。学术界和受审查的实体都可能对研究结果感兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信