The Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow Investigations of Single Dimple with Straight and Curved Arch Turbulator within in a Duct

Q3 Chemical Engineering
Sandeep Sadashiv Kore, Manoj Kumar Chaudhary, Parimal Sharad Bhambare, Dinesh Keloth Kaithari
{"title":"The Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow Investigations of Single Dimple with Straight and Curved Arch Turbulator within in a Duct","authors":"Sandeep Sadashiv Kore, Manoj Kumar Chaudhary, Parimal Sharad Bhambare, Dinesh Keloth Kaithari","doi":"10.37934/arfmts.115.1.206216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An experimental study was conducted to examine the impact of a single dimple with an arch-type turbulator on heat transfer and fluid friction. The square duct has a 4:1 aspect ratio. Reynolds numbers range from 10,000 to 35,000 depending on hydraulic diameter, maintaining as 0.5 aspect ratio between duct height and dimple diameter. Dimple depth to print diameter ratio is 0.3, which is maintained constant. Two different types of arch turbulators are tested in the first half of the dimple to improve the fluid velocities and heat transfer. The turbulators used in the investigations are both curved and straight type. Curved arch turbulators included angles are 45°, 60°, or 90°, whereas straight arch turbulators are inclined to the surface at a 12° angle. At the dimple's leading edge, an arch turbulator is installed. The experimental findings are displayed as Nusselt number, normalized Nusselt number, friction factor, normalized friction factor, and thermal performance. According to the experimental findings, turbulators with a 60° curved arch operate better than those with 45° and 90° curved arches. Compared to all other arch turbulators, the straight arch turbulator achieves the highest thermal performance.","PeriodicalId":37460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.115.1.206216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Chemical Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An experimental study was conducted to examine the impact of a single dimple with an arch-type turbulator on heat transfer and fluid friction. The square duct has a 4:1 aspect ratio. Reynolds numbers range from 10,000 to 35,000 depending on hydraulic diameter, maintaining as 0.5 aspect ratio between duct height and dimple diameter. Dimple depth to print diameter ratio is 0.3, which is maintained constant. Two different types of arch turbulators are tested in the first half of the dimple to improve the fluid velocities and heat transfer. The turbulators used in the investigations are both curved and straight type. Curved arch turbulators included angles are 45°, 60°, or 90°, whereas straight arch turbulators are inclined to the surface at a 12° angle. At the dimple's leading edge, an arch turbulator is installed. The experimental findings are displayed as Nusselt number, normalized Nusselt number, friction factor, normalized friction factor, and thermal performance. According to the experimental findings, turbulators with a 60° curved arch operate better than those with 45° and 90° curved arches. Compared to all other arch turbulators, the straight arch turbulator achieves the highest thermal performance.
管道内单凹陷直拱形和弯拱形涡轮的传热和流体流动研究
我们进行了一项实验研究,以检验带有拱形湍流器的单个凹陷对传热和流体摩擦的影响。方形管道的长宽比为 4:1。雷诺数从 10,000 到 35,000 不等,取决于水力直径,风道高度和凹痕直径之间的纵横比为 0.5。凹痕深度与打印直径之比为 0.3,并保持恒定。在酒窝的前半部分测试了两种不同类型的拱形涡轮,以提高流体速度和传热效果。研究中使用的涡轮有弧形和直形两种。弧形拱形涡轮包括 45°、60° 或 90° 角,而直形拱形涡轮则以 12° 角倾斜于表面。在酒窝的前缘,安装了一个拱形涡轮。实验结果显示为努塞尔特数、归一化努塞尔特数、摩擦因数、归一化摩擦因数和热性能。实验结果表明,60° 弧形拱的涡轮机比 45° 和 90° 弧形拱的涡轮机运行得更好。与所有其他拱形涡轮机相比,直拱形涡轮机的热性能最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences
Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences Chemical Engineering-Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
176
期刊介绍: This journal welcomes high-quality original contributions on experimental, computational, and physical aspects of fluid mechanics and thermal sciences relevant to engineering or the environment, multiphase and microscale flows, microscale electronic and mechanical systems; medical and biological systems; and thermal and flow control in both the internal and external environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信