{"title":"Tap/trill variation and change across generations of Spanish-Creole bilinguals in San Andrés, Colombia","authors":"Falcon Restrepo-Ramos","doi":"10.1075/lv.22021.res","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This work examines the behavior of vibrant (presenting linguo-alveolar contact) tap/trill variation across\n generations of bilingual Afro-Caribbean speakers of Spanish and an English-Lexifier Creole, known here as Raizal Creole, in the\n Archipelago of San Andrés, Colombia. In these islands, a bilingual Spanish variety, known here as Raizal Spanish, coexists with a\n monolingual Spanish variety spoken by Colombian immigrants (Costeño Spanish). Data consists of over 3,300 tokens (867 trills and\n 2531 taps) compared across three generations of Raizal Spanish speakers with a sample of 528 segments (133 trills and 395 taps)\n produced in Costeño Spanish. Results show that although the frequency of use of vibrant taps and trills in younger generations\n increasingly resembles those presented in the monolingual variety, the behavior of rhotic variation is different in both Spanish\n varieties. In addition, non-vibrant or approximant variants are increasingly prevalent in the first and second generation\n informants with rates doubling those of the younger generation and monolingual Costeño Spanish. Results of the cross-variety\n comparison show that Raizal Spanish displays a generational continuity where a restructuring of the constraint ordering starts in\n the second generation and is completed with younger Raizales. On the contrary, Costeño Spanish behaves differently in terms of the\n systematic linguistic conditionings. The evidence suggests that rhotic variation has changed internally within both varieties.","PeriodicalId":53947,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Variation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Variation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.22021.res","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This work examines the behavior of vibrant (presenting linguo-alveolar contact) tap/trill variation across
generations of bilingual Afro-Caribbean speakers of Spanish and an English-Lexifier Creole, known here as Raizal Creole, in the
Archipelago of San Andrés, Colombia. In these islands, a bilingual Spanish variety, known here as Raizal Spanish, coexists with a
monolingual Spanish variety spoken by Colombian immigrants (Costeño Spanish). Data consists of over 3,300 tokens (867 trills and
2531 taps) compared across three generations of Raizal Spanish speakers with a sample of 528 segments (133 trills and 395 taps)
produced in Costeño Spanish. Results show that although the frequency of use of vibrant taps and trills in younger generations
increasingly resembles those presented in the monolingual variety, the behavior of rhotic variation is different in both Spanish
varieties. In addition, non-vibrant or approximant variants are increasingly prevalent in the first and second generation
informants with rates doubling those of the younger generation and monolingual Costeño Spanish. Results of the cross-variety
comparison show that Raizal Spanish displays a generational continuity where a restructuring of the constraint ordering starts in
the second generation and is completed with younger Raizales. On the contrary, Costeño Spanish behaves differently in terms of the
systematic linguistic conditionings. The evidence suggests that rhotic variation has changed internally within both varieties.
期刊介绍:
Linguistic Variation is an international, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on the study of linguistic variation. It seeks to investigate to what extent the study of linguistic variation can shed light on the broader issue of language-particular versus language-universal properties, on the interaction between what is fixed and necessary on the one hand and what is variable and contingent on the other. This enterprise involves properly defining and delineating the notion of linguistic variation by identifying loci of variation. What are the variable properties of natural language and what is its invariant core?